Hi Urs,
[1] I have moved to Git.
[2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave
through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first:
openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded.
Interpreting music...[8][16][24]
warning: openLilyLib:
context
The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is
the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Annotate-and-Lilyglyphs-tp171471p171599.html
Sent from the User
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 13:20 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-02-07 11:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
2015-02-07 9:30 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
returns:
warning: cannot find Voice `DV'
\new Lyrics
Am 08.02.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Urs,
[1] I have moved to Git.
That's a good thing. You'll see in a minute.
[2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave
through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first:
openLilyLib: library
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2:
The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is
the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax.
which example file?
I don't see any in my working directory.
Urs
Philippe
--
View this message in
The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/
Philippe
Le 8 févr. 2015 à 11:16, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org a écrit :
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2:
The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is
the example file that still uses
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Philippe Massart:
The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/
OK.
This is the old one, a new one is in
openlilylib/ly/scholarly/usage-examples/annotate.ly
This is not really complete or well-enough tested, but I've now
committed that
Hi Kieren,
the output has indeed only one dot. But at least here it puts the dot in the
upper staff space (where the e'' is) and not next to the rest.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Urs,
Can anyone tell me (or Matteo) if there have been any significant changes in
lyrics handling that may cause this?
For it to behave as expected, you now need \new Voice (where you didn’t before)
— maybe that’s messing things up?
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
Kieren
Hi Urs,
I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly)
implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog
post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the
ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post
I just recently upgraded to Fedora 21 which upgraded my Lilypond to 2.18.2.
In previous versions the tied notes were hidden, but now they remain
visible. I had been using the following snippet to hide them, but it
doesn't seem to work anymore:
#(define (tie::tab-clear-tied-fret-numbers grob)
Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly)
implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post
(http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas
Dear Pierre,
Thank you for correcting something in connection with the dots,
But we have still a problem with it. The program puts one dot in a right
place and plus one above...
I attached.
Thank you!
Sister Judit
\version 2.19.15
\include modernGregorian.ily
%\pointAndClickOff
\language
Hi Cynthia,
I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them
issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags.
Not at all… I can think of about a half-dozen other ways to make that happen in
Lilypond.
This would be my preference, since it would
Am 08.02.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Urs Liska:
We had already made some promising experiments, but only using the
header-style documentation and usage examples mentioned above.
See http://openlilylib.org/oll-test/index.html to get a first idea.
___
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 08:28:00AM +0100, Noeck wrote:
Hi Teoh,
I can see no problem:
\version 2.18.2
{ g=4 }
\relative c'' { g='4 g,=4 g=4 }
Can you send a minimal example showing your problem?
[...]
Sorry for the false alarm, folks, I can't reproduce the problem now
either. The
On Feb 7, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Cynthia,
In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation
dots? That just doesn’t seem right.
No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit
Hello everybody,
triggered by some comments on my last post
http://lilypondblog.org/2015/01/introducing-scholarly/ I decided to pick
up a few loose ends that have been lying around for some time now, so I
finally started restructuring openLilyLib, aiming at a quite fundamental
change.
So
Hi Matteo,
as I've already expressed privately I think this is a great project -
thank you for following up on my ideas. If I get the README right this
will in fact overcome several limitations of my so-far manual approach.
I hope we'll be able to make that generally available in the most
Am 8. Februar 2015 21:56:28 MEZ, schrieb tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Conor, et. al.,
Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are
pre-fixed at all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for
anything beyond the one page in the pdf, of course. My experience
Am 08.02.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Ed Gordijn:
This is even better then perfection.
Hi,
I tried almost the same:
\version 2.18.2
\relative c'' {
\override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text =
\markup\concat{
\raise #1.0
\smaller
\musicglyph #scripts.upprall
\hspace #-0.5
}
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com wrote:
But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I
want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why
each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And
why
Conor, et. al.,
Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are pre-fixed at
all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for anything beyond the one
page in the pdf, of course. My experience tells me that LilyPond can manage
just about anything I throw at it :)
As for
It looks like an extremely neat handwritten score, but probably
written on staves that were already set, space-wise. I wonder if it
could be modified for the purposes of Lilypond, while retaining its
distinct features.
~Conor
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kieren MacMillan
Sorry,
Didn't reply to the list.
This is even better then perfection.
\version 2.17.9
beginPrallSpan =
\tweak bound-details.left.text
\markup { \fontsize #-5 { \musicglyph #accidentals.leftparen } }
\tweak bound-details.left.stencil-offset #'(0.02 . -0.65)
\tweak
Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com
mailto:pck...@mac.com wrote:
But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices
here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single
voice. That's why
Hello list,
I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from
http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/
https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip,
but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me
where to search for a
Hi List,
Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm
using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday,
and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when I try to run my
Makefile on the same piece it gives me cannot find file:
No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems
like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too
sad :)
-Abraham
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n171634...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
On Monday, February 09,
http://xkcd.com/1482/
…it would be quite easy to implement in Frescobaldi or Lilypond!
Vaughan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello list,
I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from
http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/
https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip,
but apparently Lily can’t find the
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm
using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday,
and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when
On Sunday, February 08, 2015 09:16:40 PM tisimst wrote:
No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems
like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too
sad :)
-Abraham
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond]
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com
wrote:
Are you sure:
see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold
When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by
modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what
This is correct. LibreOffice does fake italic, bold, and bold-italic if that
variant doesn't exist. LilyPond, however, makes no attempt at this and just
reverts to the closest one that is installed, which is usually the regular
variant.
- Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2015, at 9:41
Love this! Attach it to Frescobaldi's auto-compile so that it tweets and/or
posts to my facebook wall every time.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Vaughan-is-now-composing-tp171629p171630.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
36 matches
Mail list logo
