Hi Christel,
> If you think of a way: I'm definitely interested!
I do this kind of thing all the time: just use an arrow markup, disconnect it
from the spacing engine (there are a number of ways of doing this), and tack it
on to the repeat barline!
If you need more than that hint, I can whip
Le 19/05/2022 à 17:43, Christel le Pair a écrit :
Hello David,
Thank you for the quick response!
I'm working on a tablet, so I'm always on one page.
Indeed that would not be possible -> could give an error, like it more
often does ;-)
If you think of a way: I'm definitely interested!
Hi
Le 19/05/2022 à 05:53, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
Hello,
When I have a beamed tuplet (without a bracket) and a fingering on one
note, the TupletNumber moves outward from the staff despite there
being no possibility of a collison. In normal usage,
TupletNumber should stay as close as possible
Hello David,
Thank you for the quick response!
I'm working on a tablet, so I'm always on one page.
Indeed that would not be possible -> could give an error, like it more
often does ;-)
If you think of a way: I'm definitely interested!
Thanks again,
Christel
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:03 PM
> Note that this is not coming directly from LilyPond, scheme-sandbox doesn't
> need (ice-9 readline). From the call of (load-user-init), do you maybe load
> that module as part of your ~/.guile ?
That is correct, however, I was going to try and load that extension manually
anyways, see
No, there was a reason I needed the fingerings on either side of the staff
(in my use case, sometimes there is an alternate fingering).
Thanks,
On Thu, May 19, 2022, 10:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek
wrote:
> Anahu,
>
>
>
> Is this acceptable?
>
>
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative c
>
> {\tuplet 3/2
Christel le Pair writes:
> Hello Lilypond,
>
> I'm so happy with your tool.
> Just using it for my own use, have all b and # notes in red.
> But here is my question... or actually I have 2:
>
> Question 1:
> \repeat volta 2 { c1 *(* }
> \alternative
> {
> { e1*)* }
> { d1*)* }
>
Anahu,
Is this acceptable?
\version "2.22.2"
\relative c
{\tuplet 3/2 { g''8_4 g g } \tuplet 3/2 { c^4 c c } }
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Ahanu Banerjee
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 8:54 PM
To: Lily Pond
Hello Lilypond,
I'm so happy with your tool.
Just using it for my own use, have all b and # notes in red.
But here is my question... or actually I have 2:
Question 1:
\repeat volta 2 { c1 *(* }
\alternative
{
{ e1*)* }
{ d1*)* }
}
So I want to end the tie in the alternative
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 13:28 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
> writes:
> > On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:28 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Personally, I'd rather have it. The tiny fraction that will want
> > > readline support will want it for running
Hi Wilbert,I am a window 10 user, when will window exe available?Ming Sent from Mail for Windows
Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
writes:
> On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:28 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
>> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 09:57 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>> > > Le 17/05/2022 à 00:29, Hendursaga a écrit :
>> > > >
Honestly, I didn't know that the readline support existed and used `rlwrap
lilypond scheme-sandbox` for editing and history support in the REPL.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 1:39 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>
> > Le 19/05/2022 à 09:36, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> >> What does
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 19/05/2022 à 09:36, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
>> What does "nicer editing" mean here?
>
>
> Standard shell editing features: repeating previous command with arrows,
> and autocompletion.
That's not half of it. Without readline, no editing other than
backspacing (and
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 09:39 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 19/05/2022 à 09:28, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion a écrit :
> > As you can see, the REPL itself works just fine. What does not work is
> > the REPL server because we disable all networking functionality in our
> > Guile
On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 09:38 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 19/05/2022 à 09:36, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> > What does "nicer editing" mean here?
>
> Standard shell editing features: repeating previous command with arrows,
> and autocompletion.
In that case:
> If that is an optional feature
Le 19/05/2022 à 09:28, Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion a écrit :
As you can see, the REPL itself works just fine. What does not work is
the REPL server because we disable all networking functionality in our
Guile build. Here I'm even more hesitant to change direction because
Le 19/05/2022 à 09:36, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
What does "nicer editing" mean here?
Standard shell editing features: repeating previous command with arrows,
and autocompletion.
On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 23:28 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion
> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 09:57 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > > Le 17/05/2022 à 00:29, Hendursaga a écrit :
> > > > I'm trying to start a REPL server[1] inside LilyPond's Guile
>
Hi,
coming back to the start of this thread:
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 18:29 -0400, Hendursaga wrote:
> Hello LilyPond users!
>
> I'm trying to start a REPL server[1] inside LilyPond's Guile interpreter, but
> I can't get it to even load readline support. Note that I am running the
> precompiled
20 matches
Mail list logo
