Well, that approach won't handle G to C#. I still get Db with no
alternative.
J
On 3/12/24 19:02, John Helly wrote:
M.
Prompted by your idea, I could do the equivalent with a short bash
script to edit selected chords to be the appropriate enharmonic form
anticipating the transpose.
Hi, Michael! Unfortunately, this is not what I'm looking for. You seem to
have written (or copied) the 'whatiwant' part. I'm looking for a way to
abstract (as Kieren has put) the volta command. The purpose is to minimize
writing while being able to export repeat/volta musical parts (plus
straight
M.
Prompted by your idea, I could do the equivalent with a short bash
script to edit selected chords to be the appropriate enharmonic form
anticipating the transpose.
Mahalo.
On 3/12/24 18:48, John Helly wrote:
Mahalo, that's an interesting approach. Maybe something in that vein
would do
Hi Lucas,
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 7:00 PM, Lucas Cavalcanti
wrote:
>
> >
>> > Hello. I've been thinking about Lilypond's usage on parts: for one
>> musician (for example, the singer singing the melody) I'd like to give them
>> a score containing voltas using the repeat and volta commands; for
Mahalo, that's an interesting approach. Maybe something in that vein
would do it. I'll experiment.
However, I have a whole song that has a lot of chromatic chord changes
and I suspect it'll be a 'fix one, break one' situation. I'd like to
find a general solution or some way to make a
Hi John,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM John Helly wrote:
> Aloha.
>
> Here's an MWE to exhibit the issue.
>
> I have a flat note (bes) that I want to transpose down 4 half-tones to
> F#. However, when the transpose is applied, the result is Gb. I
> understand that a flat note was the
Aloha.
Here's an MWE to exhibit the issue.
I have a flat note (bes) that I want to transpose down 4 half-tones to
F#. However, when the transpose is applied, the result is Gb. I
understand that a flat note was the initial value so maybe LP is
preserving that specification?
Nonetheless,
Thanks for the reply, Kieren. Although you recommended not to, I'd like to
know if there is some documentation about this abstraction (going further
than the reference book's "Manual repeat marks"). This situation would help
me a lot.
Em ter., 12 de mar. de 2024 às 20:58, Kieren MacMillan <
Hi Lucas,
I was told by people with a far deeper understanding of Lilypond’s than mine
that trying to abstract the volta map is undesireable — it should be explicitly
included in every music expression that it intersects with.
Cheers,
Kieren.
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 7:00 PM, Lucas Cavalcanti
Hello. I've been thinking about Lilypond's usage on parts: for one musician
(for example, the singer singing the melody) I'd like to give them a score
containing voltas using the repeat and volta commands; for another musician
(for example, the drummer) I'd like to give them a score with no
Mahalo for the response.
I agree that your example works. I only recently discovered \english
and don't routinely use it, although perhaps I should.
Something else I'm doing must be overriding the enharmonic
interpretation. I'll see if I can factor it out.
J.
On 3/12/24 02:44, Kieren
Jean and Kieren -
Thank you both for pointing me in the right direction. Kieren, I actually
looked at Visibility of Objects, but somehow did not see \undo.
All the best,
Ralph
__
Ralph Palmer
Seattle
USA
(he, him, his)
palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 7:51 AM Kieren
Hi Ralph,
> I cannot figure out how to revert or reverse "\omit TupletNumber". "\once
> \omit TupletNumber" does, in fact omit only the next tuplet number. However,
> if I use "\omit TupletNumber", it omits all folowing tuplet numbers, and I
> cannot find a command to restore the tuplet
> I cannot figure out how to revert or reverse "\omit TupletNumber".
\undo \omit TupletNumber
Best,
Jean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello, again -
I cannot figure out how to revert or reverse "\omit TupletNumber". "\once
\omit TupletNumber" does, in fact omit only the next tuplet number.
However, if I use "\omit TupletNumber", it omits all folowing tuplet
numbers, and I cannot find a command to restore the tuplet numbers. Any
Hi John,
> I've got a guitar leadsheet that displays the guitar chord G# as Ab.
That’s definitely weird… On my machine, this displays G# as G# and Ab as Ab:
\version "2.25.11"
\language "english"
gsharp = \chordmode { gs1 }
aflat = \chordmode { af1 }
<<
\new ChordNames { \gsharp }
\gsharp
On 11/03/2024 16:54, Gian Paolo Renello wrote:
HI,
I searched on lilypond site a way to rewrite a SATB on 2 staves, but i
am not able to got it...
Does any one have a clue on it?
Thanks a lot
Gian Paolo
Here is the image i got form the score.
Look at \partCombine. I use it to generate a
17 matches
Mail list logo
