Hi all,
On 4/6/22 20:17, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 06/04/2022 à 14:33, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>> Is someone taking care of bugs in the magnetic snapping lyrics
>> engraver? Here is an example where it fails to position lyrics
>> correctly (see last system in the image).
>>
>>
>> Werner
Hi Urs,
I tried to reproduce, but couldn't easily. Do you have a MWE?
What I tried to test is from
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/proportional-notation
In particular, strict-note-spacing; but I'm not sure what will happen if
you try to combine strict-note-spacing = ##t
Hi Urs, hi Kim,
On 29.07.19 11:10, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi Kim (?),
>
> 28. Juli 2019 22:59, "kimfierens" schrieb:
>
>> Hi everyone, I'm new to LilyPond, and I have a layout question for you. The
>> title says it all basically: how do I get LilyPond to put a fixed distance
>> between the upper
Hi Benjamin,
the closest we have available to eliminate spurious space between
syllables is described in the thread culminating in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-05/msg00389.html
(I'm not the author of the snippet, just the bearer of the full include
file in this
On May 28, 2019 8:51:04 PM GMT+02:00, Karlin High wrote:
>On 5/28/2019 8:43 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
>> diffpdf is my friend here.
>
>That sounds like an interesting piece of software. A web search brought
>
>up quite a list of diffpdf and pdfdiff things; which is "the
Hi,
On 28.05.19 18:12, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 15:48 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
I then switched to brute-force, i.e. always throw away all
line-starting LyricHyphens
Seems to work, see attached revised file.
G, it does not.
Please try to replace
Hi,
On 27.05.19 22:34, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Mo., 27. Mai 2019 um 10:40 Uhr schrieb Alexander Kobel :
unless I additionally engage
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1090
to replace Lily's built-in hyphens by the "proper" Lyric's font hyphens;
then it breaks again.
I di
Hi Harm,
On 22.05.19 23:08, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Mi., 22. Mai 2019 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Alexander Kobel :
Hi Harm, hi all,
On 22.05.19 01:20, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Alexander Kobel :
Hi David, hi Mike, hi all,
I sometimes (still use Lilypond
Hi Harm, hi all,
On 22.05.19 01:20, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Alexander Kobel :
Hi David, hi Mike, hi all,
I sometimes (still use Lilypond, and when I do, I typically use) your
wonderful snippet for snapping "close" syllables into a si
e removed).
As I said I probably am overlooking something since Alexander Kobel made the
very same suggestion off list.
Ugh, sorry, I didn't intend to take this off-list. Feel free to repost here.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/music-expressions-explained#simultaneous-mu
Hi Michael,
what about
\new Voice { << R1 { s2. s4^"some markup" } >> }
? The \new Voice should not even be necessary in a typical score, with
blocks like
\score {
<<
\new Staff <<
% clef, time, etc.
\new Voice \thisIsWhereMyMusicComesFrom
>>
>>
}
(It's only because
Moreover, if you're working on you favorite Pi tribute choral in 3/14
time (granted, unusual), you'd be out of luck without fractions:
{ \time 3/14 R1*15/14 }
;-)
On 21.05.19 13:16, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 21.05.19 um 13:08 schrieb J Martin Rushton:
The notation reference for 2.18.2 doesn't
Hi Michael,
TL;DR: It's intended.
As the name implies, "FULL measure rests" are supposed to span full
measures. In particular, they are always rendered as if they do, so your
input should be virtually indistinguishable from R1. And it's also
indistinguishable from R1. in 3/2 time, or R1*2 in
Hi David, hi Mike, hi all,
I sometimes (still use Lilypond, and when I do, I typically use) your
wonderful snippet for snapping "close" syllables into a single token.
(For those who don't know this contribution: it's meant to get rid of
unpleasant thin-space gaps between syllables in cramped
Hi Urs, hi all,
sorry, I accidentally deleted the thread just before some hint came to
my mind, so this is not a "proper" reply.
\with-dimensions came to my mind as well, but it's not without
drawbacks. Somewhat more cumbersome to use, but also *somewhat* more
robust is to use a
Hi,
On 12.03.19 10:43, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 12.03.19 um 01:14 schrieb Aaron Hill:
On 2019-03-11 3:40 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
Urs Liska writes:
[...]
Also, I should have been clear before. David's code should work for
most cases. I was just being pedantic that /./ would not work if the
Hi,
On 07.12.18 19:27, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alex,
David's and Mike's "magnetic snapping lyrics"?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-03/msg00489.html
Yes — I have an old copy in my "Workarounds" include folder. But I ran into a
lot of problems with it (maybe
Hi Kieren,
without even looking at your example, to be honest, but a shot in the dark:
Fo you still remember David's and Mike's "magnetic snapping lyrics"?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-03/msg00489.html
This snippet eventually went into OpenLilyLib, and was apparently
Alex
On 31/10/2018 05.23, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2018-10-30 4:56 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2018-10-30 10:01 am, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Does anyone have a hint how to approach this one? (Or is the answer
just: be patient and hope for Guile v2?)
The only hint here is to replace the built-in funct
Dear all,
I'm happily using center-lyrics-ignoring-punctuation.ily in the version
from
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-12/msg00382.html
for a while now. (It's attached as well.)
Now I stumbled across the following unexpected warning:
\version "2.19.82"
\include
On 30/10/2018 14.08, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I have written to huertatipografica to ask where the definitive and most
current state of Alegreya is to be found, from their website or from
github. It's not clear what the relationship is between the two.
Hehe, indeed that's a funny coincidence.
On 30/10/2018 07.55, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Conclusion: Not all "Alegreya" fonts are the same!
Oh yes. Comparing `Alegreya-Medium.ttf': The font available from
Google Fonts is version 2.003 (from October 2017, according to the
`modified' field in the font's `head' table, even if the file stamp
On 08/07/2018 11:37 AM, Johan Vromans wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:25:53 +1000, Don Gingrich
wrote:
Then the multiplier would reside in the included files, the
variable would be in the score file, and by including
the correct file I could have either type of score.
Why not set the staff
Hi again,
On 03/02/2018 03:10 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
First I thought this is the solution.
Then the confusion came.
But now I think again that it's the solution :-)
I assume the difference between the BoundingBox and the HiResBoundingBox
is exactly what I'm after.
Unfortunately the box is
Hi Urs,
some educated guessing (and hopefully another suggestion):
On 03/01/2018 11:11 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi all,
can anyone tell me *exactly* how the bounding box values are generated
and especially rounded in LilyPond? What are they exactly referring to,
the content *with* or *without*
Hi Urs,
On 01/29/2018 02:27 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
I want to have a score start with a defined position of the first staff
symbol to match the type area of a surrounding text document. [...]
#'((basic-distance . 16)
(minimum-distance . 0)
(padding . 0)
Hi,
have to be very brief right now: have a look at
https://github.com/akobel/openlilylib/commit/bbba147196bb8527ed09d8db6b97246c579995fb
Not sure why I didn't seem to make that a PR... I thought I did? (I
filed the first PR without the version predicate, which was rightfully
declined for
Hi Peter,
On 2017-03-09 17:32, Peter Crighton wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I noticed that the title (and other header types) doesn’t get vertically
> positioned according to its baseline (which would make sense to me), but to
> its cap height or ascender height.
According to NR 4.1.4
On 2017-02-22 17:21, David Sumbler wrote:
> [...]
> So I experimented. I find that, not only does it not matter which
> voice or stave I name as "associatedVoice", but it does not even matter
> whether such a voice exists! [...]
Wrong. Compare the extenders in:
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
On 2017-02-22 14:28, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> On 2017-02-22 14:02, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>> There's currently a thread here which refers in passing to the
>> difficulty of starting a new score on a page without a line break or
>> a page break.
> [...]
> I just want
Andrew,
On 2017-02-22 14:02, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> There's currently a thread here which refers in passing to the
> difficulty of starting a new score on a page without a line break or
> a page break.
I assume you refer to the thread that I hijacked to ask Pierre for his
MuseScore-made D.C.,
Hi Trevor,
On 2017-02-22 11:31, Trevor wrote:
> To run LilyPond on AWS Lambda for LilyBin, I need to upload a zip
> file containing the LilyPond executable and assets, and it must be no
> larger than 50 MB. Recent versions of LilyPond unstable are about 52
> MB zipped (zip -r9). Are there any
c.) manually on the
output...
Cheers,
Alexander
> Le 22/02/2017 à 00:17, Alexander Kobel a écrit :
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> sorry to hear - I hoped that this might give you the desired
>> result. I'm out of other ideas for that problem, unfortunately.
>>
>
direction I want. I tried your solution, it doesn't work either. I may
have placed the commands in the wrong place, but I don't think so.
Thanks!
Pierre
Le 13/02/2017 à 16:53, Alexander Kobel a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
On 2017-02-13 10:57, Les Éditions Valmajour - pg wrote:
Hello co-lister
[Bug report summary:]
Extenders are not drawn anymore for melismata that include notes that
are not bar-aligned, starting somewhere between 2.19.50 and 2.19.55.
M(N)WE attached - the first and second score should have extenders until
the last note.
Hi Michael,
On 2017-02-18 18:59, Michael
Hi Pierre,
On 2017-02-13 10:57, Les Éditions Valmajour - pg wrote:
> Hello co-listers,
>
> does anyone know if there a way to apply different horizontal spacings to
> different staves, whithin the same bar?
>
> In the attached example, the stemless notes are 16ths. I would like the
> stemless
On 2017-01-20 10:46, David Kastrup wrote:
> Knut Petersen writes:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
+1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
choir literature (especially
Hi David,
On 2017-01-19 12:59, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David, you wrote Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:18 AM
it would appear that my excursion into a regular workplace ended up
somewhat shortlived.
Really sorry to hear that, but it's great to have you back!
Ditto. I wish that you would have
On 2017-01-03 17:25, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 03.01.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
>> On 2017-01-03 16:27, Urs Liska wrote:
>>> Just for reference, attached you'll find my preliminary result with a
>>> compound slur that is somewhat more "mainstream" t
On 2017-01-03 16:27, Urs Liska wrote:
> Just for reference, attached you'll find my preliminary result with a
> compound slur that is somewhat more "mainstream" than the original Sorabji
> example :-)
Geez! Apparently there's not just a need for irrational tuplets, but also
Bézier curves of
On 2017-01-03 13:56, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> How about the new spacing section?
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/new-spacing-section
Sounds like the most proper solution, perhaps with adjustments of
shortest-duration-space.
For dirty one-shot tweaks though,
Hi Jay,
On 2016-12-24 08:24, Jay Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de> wrote:
it seems that there is some interest in integrating your scheme engraver for
merged rests into Lilypond core. Do you mind this idea? If not, are you
inte
On 2016-12-22 18:47, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de> wrote:
On 2016-12-22 15:28, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alexander (et al.),
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336
Is this useful function part of the regular
Hi Miroslaw,
may I ask you to use the reply function of your mail interface to answer
mails? Similar to how you organize your Lilypond input in several
folders, I file my mails in several places; if you do not use the reply
function, no In-Reply-To header is inserted in your mails. So no mail
On 2016-12-22 15:28, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alexander (et al.),
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336
Is this useful function part of the regular distro?
Not that I'm aware of.
If not, is there a technical reason why not
None that I'm aware of. Unless you count the known
Hi Miroslaw,
moving this from bug- to -user.
On 2016-12-20 20:40, Mirosław Doroszewski wrote:
1. Only setting "title" in \header block is OK: when is set alone
(without any other titles), necessary additional space between "title"
and highest staff is automatically calculated.
2. But when
On 2016-12-21 18:50, Mirosław Doroszewski wrote:
Rests in polyphonic and simple music in the same staff in LilyPond
version 2.18.2.
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336
HTH,
Alexander
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Miroslaw.
On 2016-12-20 21:11, Mirosław Doroszewski wrote:
\version "2.18.2"
\include "deutsch.ly"
%{
Scaling global staff size without scaling Lyrics in LilyPond version 2.18.2.
1. It can be happen: when font size is set for lyrics, that titles are
smaller then lyrics.
a) I do not know
On 2016-12-20 02:44, Br. Samuel Springuel wrote:
On 2016-12-19 6:27 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I actually meant using an include file like the attached and not
having to add the music function locally at all.
Beautiful - didn't know that this was possible at all.
#(set!
Hi again Samuel,
great that you find it useful. Yes, the minimum-length is
well-tweakable; the default will likely be different in the "final"
version. This version for killing extenders is my old and home-grown
solution for my use cases and by no means optimized. It's not been long
since
On 2016-12-19 21:09, Br. Samuel Springuel wrote:
Is there a way to get lyric extenders to appear automatically when
lyrics have been applied to a voice using `\lyricsto`? I know how to
manually get them to appear (with `__`), but I'm wondering if there is a
simple setting that can be changed in
On 2016-12-14 11:03, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.12.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
On 2016-12-14 07:50, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Alexander!
add-lyric-extenders =
#(define-music-function (parser location lyrics) (ly:music?)
You don't need "parser location".
Hi Knut,
I
On 2016-12-14 07:12, Knut Petersen wrote:
Am 13.12.2016 um 22:43 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
On 2016-12-12 13:48, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi everybody!
Please test and comment, patch and examples attached.
Hi Knut,
works beautifully, as far as your code is concerned. But I found a bug
in my
On 2016-12-14 07:50, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Alexander!
add-lyric-extenders =
#(define-music-function (parser location lyrics) (ly:music?)
You don't need "parser location".
Hi Knut,
I think I do - see the post on lily-devel. AFAIK, the type check (here:
ly:music?) is applied to the third
Dear all,
On 2016-12-10 00:12, Alexander Kobel wrote:
[...]
AFAICS, everything works beautifully as expected, with one strange
exception: in a chord with two equal notes, the default algorithm
chooses the right one as reference, your method chooses the reference
point depending on the stem
Hi.
On 2016-12-10 20:23, Knut Petersen wrote:
Am 07.12.2016 um 23:59 schrieb Thomas Morley:
So here a very first shot.
Thanks for your work. I think the attached code shows a problem of your
code ...
Back on the topic for this thread. I also noticed that behavior, and I
thought I have a
On 2016-12-12 13:48, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi everybody!
Please test and comment, patch and examples attached.
Hi Knut,
works beautifully, as far as your code is concerned. But I found a bug
in my function (add-lyric-extenders): Unintuitively, adding an extender
after _ makes extenders
On 2016-12-12 13:42, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
BTW: Has this warning been disabled somewhere in the unstable
versions?
From 2.19.49, I get no complaint even for
<< { \stemDown b' } \\ a' >>
which clearly collides...
I think in this example there actually is no colliding-note-column clash
Hi,
On 2016-12-12 13:27, Andrew Bernard wrote:
On 12 December 2016 at 23:24, Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de
<mailto:a-ko...@a-kobel.de>> wrote:
BTW: Has this warning been disabled somewhere in the unstable
versions? From 2.19.49, I get no complaint even for
<
Hi,
On 2016-12-12 12:24, Peter Toye wrote:
Andrew, Urs,
Thanks both for the ideas. It's interesting.
Andrew's method works but gives a warning about clashing note columns
but the layout is fine.
you can add a
\once \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
before \stemDown; this will
Hi Knut, hi all.
On 2016-12-12 00:52, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Alexander
IIUC (I didn't compile it in), your patch inhibits extenders on a
single note, correct?
Yes.
Is that really what we want unconditionally,
Currently we get a short extender ... that is imho of no use and should
be
On 2016-12-11 17:24, Knut Petersen wrote:
Am 11.12.2016 um 09:05 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Sorry to ask so bluntly, but can it really be that simple? I thought a
solution must consider the x-extent of the syllable vs. the melisma as
well…
I think this is sufficiently easy to handle with the
On 2016-12-10 23:33, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2016-12-10 20:20, Noeck wrote:
[...]
Would it be possible to have automatic extender lines? For every melisma
there is an extender line if it would be longer than the minimum-length?
Hm. Iterate over lyrics and add Extender events for each
On 2016-12-11 11:04, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Hi Joram.
On 2016-12-11 09:28, Noeck wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Am 11.12.2016 um 01:17 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
Ah, no, here's the problem, as can be readily seen in the "Brich an, o
schönes Morgenlicht", first full measure
I don't think s
Hi Joram.
On 2016-12-11 09:28, Noeck wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Am 11.12.2016 um 01:17 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
Ah, no, here's the problem, as can be readily seen in the "Brich an, o
schönes Morgenlicht", first full measure
I don't think so. Because for notes like the second one in t
Hi again,
On 2016-12-10 23:33, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2016-12-10 20:20, Noeck wrote:
Hi Alexander,
where is this from: conditional-kill-lyric-extender-callback?
[...]
It is a perfect solution for a problem I had for quite some time:
In chorales (4 voices, mostly homophone), I often have
On 2016-12-10 20:20, Noeck wrote:
Hi Alexander,
where is this from: conditional-kill-lyric-extender-callback?
Does it have any drawback?
Hi Joram,
glad it helped. It seems that I wrote it, probably modeled after a
suggestion by Kieren:
On 2016-12-10 09:40, Knut Petersen wrote:
Am 10.12.2016 um 00:36 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
[...] And with this, all of this week's issues of mine are worked
around, and I can proudly present a beautiful little setting of a
beautiful little piece by Reger... :-)
Those old settings by Max Reger
On 2016-12-10 11:50, Michael Gerdau wrote:
And with this, all of this week's issues of mine are worked around, and
I can proudly present a beautiful little setting of a beautiful little
piece by Reger... :-)
Nice one
(Others already mentioned the two hyphen in bar 30)
Would you share the
Hi all,
On 2016-12-10 08:33, Noeck wrote:
Dear Alexander,
a very nice score!
thanks Joram and Knut.
I don't like to spoil it but in the last line (measure 30) I see an
extra hyphen.
I like that you spoil, that's why I posted it - always better to hame
some more pairs of eyes look at it
On 2016-12-07 23:59, Thomas Morley wrote:
2016-12-07 22:03 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de>:
On 07.12.2016 11:45, Alexander Kobel wrote:
I'm not sure whether Harm's proof of concept also involved
pre-compile-time modifications.
It certainly didn’t; Harm is a S
supported in my
Frescobaldi installation) plus dagger and double dagger that might be
used as footnote marks.
Cheers,
Alexander
On 2016-12-09 00:50, Thomas Morley wrote:
2016-12-07 1:07 GMT+01:00 Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de>:
Hi all,
yet another semi-feature request whe
On 2016-12-09 23:36, Michael Gerdau wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Confirmed by a two-minute test without recompiling anything (I use
bohoomils repo for infinality, not the aur package). Could you do me a
favor and double-check whether the skylines change if you replace
{cairo,fontconfig,freetype2} by
Hi Michael,
On 2016-12-09 07:17, Michael Gerdau wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I'm on ArchLinux 64bit myself and use a self compiled devel (curretly
2.19.52) myself. My skyline seems identical to your 2.19.50 version.
thanks a lot, that helped tremendeously to get me on the right track.
My fontforge
Hi Harm,
On 2016-12-09 00:50, Thomas Morley wrote:
[...]
Hi,
how about below?
You need a devel-version, though. Please test thoroughly. I'm too
tired to do more than the included examples.
\version "2.19.52" %% sic !! [...]
The devel version is no problem, but sleep is. Same here. Plus my
Following up on my own question:
On 2016-12-09 00:54, Alexander Kobel wrote:
[...] So, two-and-a-half questions:
What goes wrong, who has a clue or hint? And how can I double-check
whether the FontForge compilation flag was properly acknowledged?
Ouch! It wasn't:
% fgrep enable-double
On 2016-12-06 22:45, Alexander Kobel wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to lift the thread "\accidentalStyle for common choir notation"
from June-July out of the grave. Unfortunately, I don't have it in my
inbox anymore, so I need to refer to the horribly url'ed archive
http://lilypond.
On 2016-12-07 23:59, Thomas Morley wrote:
[...] So here a very first shot.
For now I let display the new _and_ the colored default LyricHyphen.
You'll see a drawback already: In tight situations the default gets
shortened until it vanishs. This is not possible or at least not
desirable for
On 2016-12-07 22:05, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 07.12.2016 01:07, Alexander Kobel wrote:
chords with two adjacent notes (shifting one note). I know that this
should be a forbidden situation for vocal music
Why should it? I hardly think anybody should feel inclined to sing it
/non divisi
Hi Knut,
thanks for looking into that. IIUC (and without looking into your code -
is it on Github or otherwise publicly avaiable?), it seems that you
essentially add a text-interface to LyricHyphen. That's what would have
been my idea as well, if I were up to it.
Rebuilding is not a problem
On 2016-12-07 00:10, Thomas Morley wrote:
2016-12-06 23:41 GMT+01:00 Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de>:
On 2016-12-06 23:28, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 06.12.2016 23:00, Alexander Kobel wrote:
replace the LyricHyphen "elementary stencil" by a properly printed
hyphen from th
Hi all,
yet another semi-feature request where I'm running out of knowledge...
I happily used LSR 888 (center lyrics without taking punctuation into
account) for years and only now found out that the alignment is off
under certain circumstances: The default algorithm seems to align lyrics
on
On 2016-12-06 23:28, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 06.12.2016 23:00, Alexander Kobel wrote:
replace the LyricHyphen "elementary stencil" by a properly printed
hyphen from the LyricText font
A very good request :-)
<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1255/>
Oh, rig
Hi Abraham,
On 2016-12-06 23:14, tisimst wrote:
Alexander,
[...]
I failed with
\override LyricHyphen.text = #"-"
\override LyricHyphen.stencil = #lyric-text::print
trying to replace the LyricHyphen "elementary stencil" by a properly
printed hyphen from the LyricText
Dear all,
every now and then, I use a font for lyrics where the hyphen is quite
different from Lilypond's LyricHyphen (in particular, sometimes it's
slightly slanted). That combined with lyrics where a hyphen has to
appear looks, well, ugly. (Recent example: a repetition of part of a
word
Dear all,
I'd like to lift the thread "\accidentalStyle for common choir notation"
from June-July out of the grave. Unfortunately, I don't have it in my
inbox anymore, so I need to refer to the horribly url'ed archive
(Bcc'ing bug-lilypond now. What a useful feature! ;-))
On 2016-11-29 16:18, Phil Holmes wrote:
[...] In fact, I tend to be confused about the different layout and
sectioning of the manual pages for stable and unstable. Now suddenly I
wonder whether in the long run it would be a good idea to
Cheers,
(Cross-posting from bug-lilypond to avoid flooding of the bug list with
discussion about general website design; especially the last paragraph
might or not might not be interesting for the current discussion.)
On 2016-11-29 15:29, Erik Ronström wrote:
[...] While the old site may
Dear all,
especially the King's Singers et al. among you... ;-)
A few weeks ago, a conductor (whom I appreciate a lot) gave a lesson
about how to execute tied quavers in British choral music. My whole life
before, another conductor (whom I appreciate a lot) taught me the
exactly opposite
Hi,
mid-2014 laptop: Lily 2.19.49 on a Dell Latitude E5440, Arch Linux
chroot running on Debian Jessie: 49 sec, 1.25 GB peak memory usage.
Wouldn't recommend this particular laptop, though, but just included it
so that you have a ballpark figure.
% inxi -Fxz
System:Host: lap-11-52
On 2016-11-15 12:28, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi!
I’ve some variations in a song, so that one verse uses a different ending
melody. I’d like to mark that with segno/coda signs, like this:
textIII = \lyricmode {
\repeat unfold 7 { " " }
blah blah blah
% \override
On 2016-11-15 09:21, David Kastrup wrote:
Andrew Bernard writes:
Hi Robert,
I for one don't think lilypond should be making decisions for you about tie
direction based on an idea of sequenced phrases. I know lilypond strives to
do as much good layout as it can
Hi,
FWIW, I just tested your example on a perfectly up-to-date Arch Linux
setup (still my first Arch installation, regularly "pacman -Syu"-updated
since appx. 4 years), with Lily 2.19.50. No problems at all - find the
output attached.
On your last update, did you realize the news at
On 2016-11-10 16:34, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 10.11.2016 15:28, Francesco Napoleoni wrote:
(how) can I get instrument names at the start of staves
automatically aligned to the internal page margin?
Unfortunately you can’t. There already is a request for that feature in
our issue tracker, but
Dear David,
my sincere thanks for your past and ongoing work and dedication for
Lilypond (and other FOSS, by the way). We are well aware that our
donations could not sustain you in the long run. As always in such
situations, it's a pity for the community to hear that an important
member of
On 2016-11-08 18:15, Hans Åberg wrote:
I gave an example of a true irrational time signature [1]. The code
is actually written in 12/8, with a MIDI approximation in 19/8. Such
meter approximations can be obtained using continued fractions
convergents [2]. For the rendering, it suffices with an
On 2016-11-07 08:16, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2016-11-06 um 22:56 schrieb Alexander Kobel <a-ko...@a-kobel.de>:
In many brochure-bound volumes of more than two or three sheets (say, 60+
pages), the paper is cut to align flush when the brochure is closed. So the
inner
On 2016-11-08 08:45, mclaren wrote:
Technically speaking, we're also dealing with transcendental tuplets rather
than irrationals here, since the square root of pi is a transcendental
number (I think. Pi is known to be transcendental, but is the square of pi
proven to be transcendental?).
On 2016-11-07 14:42, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Just found out this is not exactly true. Fonts I have purchased are there.
Subscription fonts are not.
I found where they are, and they are hidden, and obfuscated and in folders you
cannot read, such as:
On 2016-11-07 13:21, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hi All,
A lot of very useful input and food for thought here. I confess I am not an
expert on the legal issues, [...]
I had assumed that pulling the fonts out of a PDF in the case of SkyFonts
amounted to reverse engineering and was therefore barred.
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo