On 01.07.24 21:32, Paul Scott wrote:
Sometimes the scope of functions? is not always clear.
I’m not sure what you mean by that. \afterGrace takes two arguments,
both of which are a single music expression each. {} or <<>> are used to
combine multiple things into a single musi
Thank you, both,
Sometimes the scope of functions? is not always clear.
Paul
On 7/1/24 12:19 PM, Valentin Petzel wrote:
Hello Paul,
\afterGrace ees2~\startTrillSpan ees1 { d16( ees) }
correct would be
ees2~\startTrillSpan \afterGrace ees1 { d16( ees) }
or
\afterGrace { ees2
Hello Paul,
> \afterGrace ees2~\startTrillSpan ees1 { d16( ees) }
correct would be
ees2~\startTrillSpan \afterGrace ees1 { d16( ees) }
or
\afterGrace { ees2~\startTrillSpan ees1 } { d16( ees) }
(note that the latter one may have weird implications depending on
afterGraceFraction,
Le lundi 01 juillet 2024 à 12:05 -0700, Paul Scott a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This MWE works as I expect for the 1st \afterGrace but not for the 2nd
> one. In both cases I want the 16th notes in curly brackets to be the
> grace notes. I have tried several places to put the tied note
Hi,
This MWE works as I expect for the 1st \afterGrace but not for the 2nd
one. In both cases I want the 16th notes in curly brackets to be the
grace notes. I have tried several places to put the tied note.
\version "2.25.17"
\fixed c''' {
r2 \afterGrace f\start
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 1:19 AM wrote:
> Good day,
>
>
>
> I use afterGrace notes to mark the end of a glissando. At the moment
> lilypond places these afterGrace notes somehow depending on the note's
> length.
> I want the glissando to be played over the entire leng
Good day,
I use afterGrace notes to mark the end of a glissando. At the moment
lilypond places these afterGrace notes somehow depending on the note's
length.
I want the glissando to be played over the entire length of the time
unit, so the afterGrace notes should be placed as close as pos
tached to anything, and try to find a
previous note it can be attached to.
This means that other than c-\glissando you can also do {c}\glissando or
whatever.
But if you have a function like \afterGrace and then do #startNote \glissando
... the parser will see this as two different entities a
Hi Walt,
On 4/11/24 13:11, Walt North wrote:
> Hello, I would appreciate some help with this music function.
>
> The end goal is have a define function produce a glissando after a
> note going either up or down to undetermined second note. For
> example a guitar slide down off the note.
If I'm u
or down direction.
\version "2.24.2"
slideOutOf =
#(define-music-function (startNote endNote)
(ly:music? ly:music?)
#{
\afterGrace 1 #startNote \glissando
{ \hideNotes #endNote \unHideNotes }
#})
%this works as I want.
notesOne = {
\relative {
r4
\afterGr
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:38 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
>
> \version "2.25.13"
>
> \relative {
>\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c~ } c4
> }
>
>
Works great! Thanks.
--
Knute Snortum
On 2024-03-22 8:24 am, Knute Snortum wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to tie an afterGrace note to the next note and I get a
warning. This code:
\version "2.25.13"
\relative {
\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 c~ } c4
}
...produces this warning:
/tmp/frescobaldi-ieh3nrny/tmpq4
Hi all,
I am trying to tie an afterGrace note to the next note and I get a
warning. This code:
\version "2.25.13"
\relative {
\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 c~ } c4
}
...produces this warning:
/tmp/frescobaldi-ieh3nrny/tmpq4qpjmjp/document.ly:4:33 <0>: warning:
unt
Thanks for the response!
Following (without /\glissando/) works now:
#{ \afterGrace #starttone { \once \hide Stem \parenthesize #endtone } #}
Unfortunately, as soon as I insert the /\glissando/ between /#starttone/
and /{/, it seems to ignore both /\afterGrace/ and /\glissando
jca...@web.de writes:
> Good day,
>
> following snippet I need very frequently (with different notes instead
> of c4 and e4):
>
>\afterGrace c4 \glissando {\once \hide Stem \parenthesize e4}
>
>
> That's why I wanted to create a music function to shorten the
&
On 2024-02-23 4:46 am, jca...@web.de wrote:
My previous attempt:
graceGliss =
#(define-music-function
(starttone endtone)
(ly:music? ly:music?)
#{
\afterGrace #starttone \glissando {\once \hide Stem
\parenthesize #endtone}
#})
doesn't work, Return
Good day,
following snippet I need very frequently (with different notes instead
of c4 and e4):
\afterGrace c4 \glissando {\once \hide Stem \parenthesize e4}
That's why I wanted to create a music function to shorten the
expression. My previous attempt:
graceGliss =
#(define-
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le lundi 13 février 2023 à 18:08 +0100, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> That begs the question whether it would make sense to restrict
>> afterGrace scales to values below 1. But I think that making syntactic
>> decisions based on values rather than
Le lundi 13 février 2023 à 18:08 +0100, David Kastrup a écrit :
> That begs the question whether it would make sense to restrict
> afterGrace scales to values below 1. But I think that making syntactic
> decisions based on values rather than types is really icky. It is
> pr
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Hi Werner,
>
>>> Alternatively you may try to use \afterGrace to insert the \clef
>>> before the bar line, although this would probably require some
>>> manual spacing too.
>> This doesn't work at all: `\afterGrace`
> That is because you are using 1 instead of a note name such as c'1. after-
> grace does not handle this mechanism.
Thanks (and thanks to Lukas, too)!
> Instead of manually extra-offsetting the Clefs you might also do
> something along the lines of [...]
Nice! I will use that.
Werner
That is because you are using 1 instead of a note name such as c'1. after-
grace does not handle this mechanism.
You can see here that this does work, but it does produce less optimal
spacing:
\relative c' {
<<
\new Staff { \afterGrace f1 { e16[ f] } | g1 }
\new
Hi Werner,
Alternatively you may try to use \afterGrace to insert the \clef
before the bar line, although this would probably require some
manual spacing too.
This doesn't work at all: `\afterGrace` doesn't accept a clef, as the
image shows.
afterGrace is defined as
#(define-musi
> [...] I'm rather inclined to count the behaviour of `space-alist`
> for clefs as a buglet: It doesn't make sense allowing the clef to
> move 'under' other notes in different staves while its `space-alist`
> values are applied globally to all staves.
This is now issue #6529.
https://gitlab.com
tal
space, which is especially undesirable
for `\afterGrace`. This extra space can be suppressed by setting
```
\once\override Staff.Clef.space-alist.staff-bar = #'(extra-space . 0)
```
but this moves the clef too near to the bar line. I'm rather inclined
to count the behaviour of `space-
Hello Werner,
When doing \afterGrace internally something like
<< [music] { [some-skip] [graces] } >>
is created. These graces will necessarily not fall onto the last timestep of
the measure, which appears to be where the Clef stencil is limited to, which
we can see here:
Please look at this example.
```
\relative c' {
<<
{ \afterGrace f1 { e16[ f] } | g1 }
{ c1 \clef "bass" | c,1 }
>>
}
\relative c' {
<<
{ f2.. e16[ f] | g1 }
{ c1 \clef "bass" | c,1 }
>>
}
```
What can I do to ma
Well, it looks correct :-) using \afterGrace :-)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:51 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> I think the sheet music that I am engraving from requires an \afterGrace.
>
> See attached screenshots.
>
> Here's a very small excerpt of my Lilyp
Thanks, everyone, for the detailed explanations and the proposed solution!
-Ahanu
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 7:28 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>
> > Hi Ahanu,
> >
> >> In lilypond 2.20.0, I was able to use "afterGrace" like
Hi,
The reason is that for some weeks now, I've been having issues with
mail delays on the LilyPond mailing lists: I routinely receive
e-mails 1-2 days late, and most of the time, I see replies to
messages that haven't arrived yet. While I'm sure no information gets
lost in the long run, th
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>>> For the optional argument of \afterGrace, there would be some incentive
>>> in case of a duration to interpret it as a duration rather than as a
>>> scale factor. That would, however, make this different from either what
>>>
For the optional argument of \afterGrace, there would be some incentive
in case of a duration to interpret it as a duration rather than as a
scale factor. That would, however, make this different from either what
\afterGraceFraction accepts, or what its name insinuates. Also it would
make
David Kastrup writes:
> Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>
>> meaning: A scale? can be
>> - a fraction?
>> - an non-negative exact rational number
>> - a LilyPond moment whose main part is in turn a scale?.
>>
>> This is fulfilled by 4, hence in your call
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Hi Ahanu,
>
>> In lilypond 2.20.0, I was able to use "afterGrace" like this:
>>
>> \version "2.20.0"
>> \language "english"
>> \relative c' { d2 \afterGrace 4 { cs16 d } }
&
Le 28/05/2022 à 13:12, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
Hi Jean,
If you don't want to fix your files manually, you could
add a redefinition of \afterGrace that doesn't have
this optional argument, like this:
\version "2.22.2"
afterGrace = \afterGrace \afterGraceFrac
Hi Jean,
If you don't want to fix your files manually, you could
add a redefinition of \afterGrace that doesn't have
this optional argument, like this:
\version "2.22.2"
afterGrace = \afterGrace \afterGraceFraction \etc
\language "english"
\relative
Hi Ahanu,
In lilypond 2.20.0, I was able to use "afterGrace" like this:
\version "2.20.0"
\language "english"
\relative c' { d2 \afterGrace 4 { cs16 d } }
However, this now presents an error: "warning: \afterGrace exceeds
duration of mai
Le 28/05/2022 à 03:19, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
Hello,
In lilypond 2.20.0, I was able to use "afterGrace" like this:
\version "2.20.0"
\language "english"
\relative c' { d2 \afterGrace 4 { cs16 d } }
However, this now presents an error: "w
Hello,
In lilypond 2.20.0, I was able to use "afterGrace" like this:
\version "2.20.0"
\language "english"
\relative c' { d2 \afterGrace 4 { cs16 d } }
However, this now presents an error: "warning: \afterGrace exceeds duration
of main argument". Run
"2.20"
slash = \tweak Flag.stroke-style grace \etc
\new Staff \relative c' {
\afterGrace 1 \slash d8 1
}
Hi Stephan,
\relative c' { \afterGrace 1 d8 1 }
and
\relative c' { 1 \slashedGrace d8 1 }
The relevant property in \slahsedGrace working under the hood is
\temporary \override Flag.stroke-style = "grace"
In order to avoid braces, one can do this in a \tweak, yield
tive {
<<
{ d''1^\trill }
{ s2 s4. \slashedGrace { d8-( } }
>>
c1)
}
Hope it helps
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, 00:48 Stephan Schöll, wrote:
Hi
I would like to obtain kind of a mix of
\relative c' { \afterGrace 1 d8 1 }
and
\relative c'
Grace { d8-( } }
>>
c1)
}
Hope it helps
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, 00:48 Stephan Schöll, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to obtain kind of a mix of
>
> \relative c' { \afterGrace 1 d8 1 }
>
> and
>
> \relative c' { 1 \slashedGrace d8 1 }
>
> How do I g
Hi
I would like to obtain kind of a mix of
\relative c' { \afterGrace 1 d8 1 }
and
\relative c' { 1 \slashedGrace d8 1 }
How do I get a slashed grace note *before* the beat / bar line in a
handy way?
The source I have consulted up to now:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Doc
\afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
Richard
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 09:13 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have
> a symbol attached to the note (which I sh
Sorry for the hour!
It's a matter of parenthesis order and spaces:
\relative c' {
\afterGrace g4-+( { a16 g16) }
}
This works for me
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 10:13 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did t
hat those are supposed to postfixed to the
note where the slur ends, not a sequence { } of notes.
Richard
>
> Again, thanks.
>
> Alasdair
>
> On Sunday 06 February 2022 20:53:12 (+11:00), Richard Shann wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > \afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)}
Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur inside
the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
Again, thanks.
Alasdair
On Sunday 06 February 2022 20:53:12 (+11:00), Richard Shann wrote:
>
>
> \afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
>
> Richard
>
> On
Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early evening).
I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have a symbol
attached to the note (which I should have included in my example):
\afterGrace g4-+( {a16 g16} )
I've tried moving the beginning of the sl
Good morning,
try:
\afterGrace g4( { a16 g16) }
The slur event must be attached directly after the note.
Rip_mus
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 08:59 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> This works:
> g4( \grace {a16 g16})
>
> making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get
This works:
g4( \grace {a16 g16})
making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
right spacing and barring (I need grace notes to occur before the bar line,
rather than after), I need to use "afterGrace":
\afterGrace g4 {a16 g16}
However, if I attempt to
Wow- 28 minutes from problem to solution! Thank you again to Lukas and Knute.
-Stan
> On Nov 11, 2021, at 5:49 PM, Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:24 PM Stan Sanderson wrote:
>>
>> How can I obtain an an acciaccatura-style (slashed) grace stem with
Hi Stan,
Am 12.11.21 um 00:17 schrieb Stan Sanderson:
How can I obtain an an acciaccatura-style (slashed) grace stem with
\afterGrace? Much searching has failed to find an answer. Help appreciated!
Thanks,
Stan
\version "2.23.3"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c
{\cl
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:24 PM Stan Sanderson wrote:
>
> How can I obtain an an acciaccatura-style (slashed) grace stem with
> \afterGrace? Much searching has failed to find an answer. Help appreciated!
> Thanks,
> Stan
>
> \version "2.23.3"
> \include "en
How can I obtain an an acciaccatura-style (slashed) grace stem with
\afterGrace? Much searching has failed to find an answer. Help appreciated!
Thanks,
Stan
\version "2.23.3"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c
{\clef bass
<<{ 2 \afterGrace 3/4 2 8( | 1) }
Dear Andrew
You are welcome to put it for OLL.
I won't do it. And I won't reply to related questions on Github tracker.
Lack of time and interest.
Il giorno mer 23 set 2020 alle 11:20, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
Re OLL, why not, actually? Putting into OLL is a simple matter of
creating a di
Re OLL, why not, actually? Putting into OLL is a simple matter of
creating a directory and placing the unmodified code in a file names
module.ily. It's nice to provide an example file to go along with it as
well. That's very little 'adaptation'.
Urs and I are trying to promote OLL by explainin
Il giorno dom 20 set 2020 alle 12:33, Jonas Hahnfeld
ha scritto:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2020, 12:27 +0200 schrieb Federico Bruni:
Il giorno gio 17 set 2020 alle 11:11, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
> the bend-engraver-thingies are not part of core LilyPond.
> Please post at least the lin
Am Do., 17. Sept. 2020 um 12:27 Uhr schrieb Federico Bruni :
>
> Il giorno gio 17 set 2020 alle 11:11, Thomas Morley
> ha scritto:
> > the bend-engraver-thingies are not part of core LilyPond.
> > Please post at least the link where you got it, otherwise you'll not
> > get a lot of help ...
>
> Ha
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2020, 12:27 +0200 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> Il giorno gio 17 set 2020 alle 11:11, Thomas Morley
> ha scritto:
> > the bend-engraver-thingies are not part of core LilyPond.
> > Please post at least the link where you got it, otherwise you'll not
> > get a lot of help ...
>
Il giorno gio 17 set 2020 alle 11:11, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
the bend-engraver-thingies are not part of core LilyPond.
Please post at least the link where you got it, otherwise you'll not
get a lot of help ...
Harm, the code is currently hosted on pagure.io:
https://pagure.io/lilypond-bend-
I know a lot of programming languages, but lisp dialects are not in my
collection. Is there a simple function that could shorten this for me?
Something like:
addQuarterBend =
#(define-event-function (mus)(ly:music?)
#{
\afterGrace $mus \startBend {\once \hideNotes \transpose c cih
$mus
is because I am bending to a grace note on the note that
> follows the note I want decorated. For this incorrect note, the grace would
> be in the following measure, so I have to use \afterGrace To keep everything
> together. However, as you can see, Lilypond renders two of these notes
Can you post an image of the desired result? I suspect there is a better
way to do this, but I need to see. A pencil sketch will do.
Andrew
On 14/09/2020 12:07 pm, Kevin Nowaczyk wrote:
I am creating a guitar tablature which includes some 1/4 bends.
Typical guitar tabs do not display the micr
ave note, and hide that note.
Unfortunately; there is a problem if I need to bend the final note of a
measure. I was hoping I could use this:
\hideAccidental \afterGrace c''\startBend cih''16\stopBend
The after grace note is actually displayed twice, and I am unable to figu
: AfterGrace
Hi Mark,
On 6 June 2016 at 04:24, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> In the attached snippet I want the aftergrace positioned closer to the
> subsequent bar line.
>
Hi Mark,
> On 6 June 2016 at 4:26:08 AM, Mark Stephen Mrotek (carsonm...@ca.rr.com)
> wrote:
>
> In
Hi Mark,
On 6 June 2016 at 04:24, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> In the attached snippet I want the aftergrace positioned closer to the
> subsequent bar line.
>
Hi Mark,
> On 6 June 2016 at 4:26:08 AM, Mark Stephen Mrotek (carsonm...@ca.rr.com)
> wrote:
>
> In the attach
Hello,
In the attached snippet I want the aftergrace positioned closer to the
subsequent bar line.
What should I do?
Thank you,
Mark
\version "2.18.2"
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key g \major
\time 6/8
\afterGrace 2.\fermata {
Pierre Perol-Schneider gmail.com> writes:
> I was not able to reproduce the stem length shown on your picture. Please
be so kind to send compilable example including the version you're using.
That might be awhile... time is short at the moment and I have a feeling
that it won't be an obvious com
here's two possibilities:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative {
\clef "tenor"
\omit Staff.TimeSignature
aes4. g8 ~ g4 r8 \p \afterGrace c8 ( \mp\< { d16 [ e ] }
f8 \> e ) d16 ( c8. ) \! f,4. r8
r2 r4 \clef bass \afterGrace d4 \mp _(
{
\override Bea
. ~ (
af g8 ~ g4 ) r8 \p \afterGrace c8 ( \mp\< { d16 [ e ] }
f8 \> e ) d16 ( c8. ) \! f,4. r8
r2 r4 \clef bass \afterGrace d4 \mp _( { df16 [ c ] }
b4. ) \< g8 ~ g16 f8. c4-> ~ \f\>
(And, just for fun, I tried moving "\clef bass" before the r4 -- no effect, as
2015-05-16 13:58 GMT+02:00 Venus' Wink :
> Hi,
>
> I've found this is a known bug:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2769
>
> Thanks
> Venus' Wink
I've updated issue 2769
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2769
with the workaround
Thanks,
Harm
P.S. please
> -Original Message-
> From: thomasmorle...@gmail.com
> Sent: Sat, 16 May 2015 12:40:02 +0200
> To: venuswi...@inbox.com
> Subject: Re: afterGrace on Completion_heads_engraver layout
>
> 2015-05-16 11:58 GMT+02:00 Venus' Wink :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
2015-05-16 11:58 GMT+02:00 Venus' Wink :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying use \afterGrace on layout consists Completion_heads_engraver as:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Voice
> \remove "Note_heads_engr
Hi,
I'm trying use \afterGrace on layout consists Completion_heads_engraver as:
\version "2.18.2"
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
}
}
{
c'4 \afterGrace
Thank you Jay.
Pierre
2015-01-16 6:02 GMT+01:00 Jay Anderson :
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
> wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > Does anybody knows what Elaine Gould says about that?
>
> I assume you're talking about whether the trill should extend over the
> finishing grace no
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
wrote:
> ...
>
> Does anybody knows what Elaine Gould says about that?
I assume you're talking about whether the trill should extend over the
finishing grace notes. The answer is no. The examples on page 138 end
the trill line before the gr
Hi Cynthia, Hi Jay,
A little off-topic :
\version "2.19.15"
\markup\italic "I'd right it so:"
\score {
<<
\new Staff \relative c'' {
#(define afterGraceFraction (cons 15 16))
d1~\afterGrace
d1\startTrillSpan { c32([\stopTrillSpan d])
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> The following snippet is based on the afterGrace snippet on p.136 of the
> 2.19.15 Notation manual:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff \relative c'
The following snippet is based on the afterGrace snippet on p.136 of the
2.19.15 Notation manual:
\version "2.19.15"
\score {
<<
\new Staff \relative c'' {
d1~\afterGrace
2014-12-27 12:20 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni :
> I see that if I change the direction of the slashed stem it appears a bit
> too long (I think) and I must tweak it, see commented line below:
>
I totally agree.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
relative c'' {
r2 \afterGrace
c2 {
\once\override Flag.stroke-style = #"grace"
d8
}
\afterGrace
c1 {
\once\override Flag.stroke-style = #"grace"
\once\stemDown
%\once\override Stem.length = #4.5
d8
}
}
Il giorno sab 27 dic 2014 alle 12:01,
Hi Federico,
There's a conflict between \afterGrace and \slashedGrace in your coding.
How about :
\version "2.19.15"
\relative c'' {
\afterGrace
c1 {
\once\override Flag.stroke-style = #"grace"
d8
}
}
HTH,
Pierre
2014-12-27 11:35 GMT+01:00
I think that I already asked the same question few weeks ago but can't
find it in my inbox nor in the archives.
How can I use slashedGrace for a grace note at the end of a bar?
\version "2.19.15"
\relative c'' {
\slashedGrace d8 d4 r2. |
\afterGrace c1 { d8 } |
%
Ah, I figured it out by setting /\set Staff.tieWaitForNote = ##t/
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Tied-afterGrace-notes-don-t-work-tp168089p168091.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/\version "2.19.15"
\new Voice {
\afterGrace R1 { g''8~ } | 1
}/
results in 'warning: unterminated tie' and no tie printed. (Slurring the two
notes, on the other hand, works fine)
Is this a limitation, and if so, what would be a workaround to produce a
visua
>
>
> I changed the
>
> <<
> \new Voice \voiceOne { \afterGrace fis4 \glissando a8 }
> \new Voice \voiceTwo { \stemUp a4 }
> \new Voice \voiceThree { \afterGrace dis4 \glissando fis8 }
> >>
>
>
>
> to
>
>
>
> voiceone = \relative c' {
> a''4 < b,, dis a > dis16 a fis' dis |
> a'4 < dis,, a' b > a'16 fis b( a) |
> dis4 < fis, a dis >
> %% changed input order:
> < fis dis' a >\glissando
> %% thanks to David K:
> \grace { \bar "" 8 \bar "|" }
> < a fis' >4 < gis e' >
> }
; a''4 < b,, dis a > dis16 a fis' dis |
> a'4 < dis,, a' b > a'16 fis b( a) |
> dis4 < fis, a dis >
> <<
> \new Voice \voiceOne { \afterGrace fis4 \glissando a8 }
> \new Voice \voiceTwo { \stemUp a
e = \relative c' {
> a''4 < b,, dis a > dis16 a fis' dis |
> a'4 < dis,, a' b > a'16 fis b( a) |
> dis4 < fis, a dis >
> <<
> \new Voice \voiceOne { \afterGrace fis4 \glissando a8 }
> \new Voice \voiceTwo {
t;2.18.0"
global = {
\time 3/4
\key e \major
\clef "G_8"
}
voiceone = \relative c' {
a''4 < b,, dis a > dis16 a fis' dis |
a'4 < dis,, a' b > a'16 fis b( a) |
dis4 < fis, a dis >
<<
\new Voice \voice
David Kastrup writes:
> Daniel Rosen writes:
>
>> In the example below, how can I adjust the space between the second
>> grace note and the barline? I'd like for the barline to be closer.
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>> #(define afterGraceFraction
Daniel Rosen writes:
> In the example below, how can I adjust the space between the second
> grace note and the barline? I'd like for the barline to be closer.
>
> \relative c'' {
> #(define afterGraceFraction (cons 15 16))
> c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
In the example below, how can I adjust the space between the second grace note
and the barline? I'd like for the barline to be closer.
\relative c'' {
#(define afterGraceFraction (cons 15 16))
c1 \afterGrace d1 { c16[ d] } c1
}
DR
_
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 07/12/2012 00:18, Olivier Biot ha scritto:
>
>> Dear LilyPond users,
>>
>> I just came across a weird interaction between articulate.ly
>> <http://articulate.ly> and aftergrace.
>>
>> I
Il 07/12/2012 00:18, Olivier Biot ha scritto:
Dear LilyPond users,
I just came across a weird interaction between articulate.ly
<http://articulate.ly> and aftergrace.
If I include "articulate.ly <http://articulate.ly>" then beamed
aftergrace notes have a tenuto ar
Dear LilyPond users,
I just came across a weird interaction between articulate.ly and aftergrace.
If I include "articulate.ly" then beamed aftergrace notes have a tenuto
articulation and are not rendered smaller, even though I never called the
\articulate macro.
Here's the LilyP
Dear community,
thanks for Your code.
I can't remember my mistake, but I see, that it works fine now!
> I tested:
>
> \new Staff {
> \afterGrace
> \pitchedTrill
> fis''2
> \startTrillSpan gis''
> { e''16[ fis
tet (composed ca.1899, published posthumously 1904), f.w.i.w. ...)
>
> \stemNeutral g8[( \times 4/6 {\stemUp a!32 b c d e f)]} \stemNeutral
> \afterGrace \pitchedTrill g2(\fermata\startTrillSpan as { fis16[ g])
> bes4^\markup{\italic"rit."}^^ as^^ g(^^ e!\stopTrillSpan)^^}
&g
2012/11/11 Eluze :
> Stefan Thomas-5 wrote
>> Dear community,
>> I'm using version 2.16.0
>
> Trevor complained about:
>
> /But combining pitchedTrill with afterGrace gives a wide and varied
> array of warnings and errors, …/
>
> is that still the case with
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
