Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8 August 2016 at 09:43, Dona Mommsen-Ghosh wrote: > Hi, > > please allow me to share my 2 cents… > I'm an occasional user of LilyPond, and I think a Logo is a great thing > in terms of recognition. However, I fear that Frescobaldi beat you to it. > Since I don’t use Lilypond regularly, Fresco

Re: LilyPond logo?

rk=ca.rr@gnu.org > <mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org>] On Behalf Of > Pierre Perol-Schneider > Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM > To: Noeck mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de>> > Cc: lilypond-user mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>> > Subject: Re:

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 07/08/16 20:44, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Or do I have too little faith in crowd intelligence and the aesthetic > reckoning of everybody who likes working with Lilypond? I think you might. It's amazing how everybody seems to be targetting in on just a few possibilities - which are all very simila

Re: LilyPond logo?

FROM: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] ON BEHALF OF Pierre Perol-Schneider SENT: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM TO: Noeck CC: lilypond-user SUBJECT: Re: LilyPond logo? pdf 2016-08-07 14:13 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Updates. Please select the ones

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 06/08/16 19:38, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Tests update attached. > I'm still a fan of 6 or 9. But 9 feels better because it's simpler. Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 07/08/16 16:17, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello all, > > What about a perspective-sheared bass clef as the leaf? > Just a thought, trying to tie it all together. > +1 Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.g

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hello all, What about a perspective-sheared bass clef as the leaf? Just a thought, trying to tie it all together. Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _

RE: LilyPond logo?

Pierre: Nix 4, 5, 10, and 11. Thank you Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Perol-Schneider Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM To: Noeck Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? pdf 2016-08-07

Re: LilyPond logo?

Updates. Please select the ones that should be deleted. Cheers Pierre 2016-08-07 9:34 GMT+02:00 Noeck : > Hi, > > > I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for > > the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe. > > It's a little bit different (in short: women): > > http://

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi, > I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for > the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe. It's a little bit different (in short: women): http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/newweb/out/site/about/name Cheers, Joram ___ li

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/6/2016 11:31 AM, Noeck wrote: > Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. >> >> I think it would be a nicer approach to having something >> recognizab

RE: LilyPond logo?

Pierre, #6 Thank you. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Perol-Schneider Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 1:36 PM To: Malte Meyn Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? Tests update enclosed. Cheers

Re: LilyPond logo?

\line { \with-color #red \bold "14. " "Music engraving by" \combine \concat { \hspace #0.5 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" } \raise #0.4 \override #'(thickness . 2.4) \override #'(style . outline) \whiteout \logoMalteSeven #0.5 "LilyPond 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org" } Ok, I should go to bed, probably this

Re: LilyPond logo?

Or even: \version "2.19.46" lilypond = \markup\concat { "Lily" \hspace #-.6 \raise #.5 \rotate #170 \fontsize #-4 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" \hspace #-.5 "ond" } \markup { \with-color #red \bold "13. " "Music engraving by" \lilypond " 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Malte Meyn: - #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try to add a pad. Here is an attempt to use

Re: LilyPond logo?

Tests update attached. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 19:20 GMT+02:00 Blöchl Bernhard : > I recommend a simple solution: > Do not use it! > > Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: > >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of LilyPond is the beautifully-engrav

Re: LilyPond logo?

I recommend a simple solution: Do not use it! Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, @ Johan: I fully agree. Done. @ Malte: OK copied. @ Simon: Yes I had the same feeling but I'm stuck there, still trying to find something much better. @ Graham: Ok, good idea but I not fully agree with the 'botany' reason (any direct link between an apple and a computer ?) Tests attach

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: > Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part > of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. > > I think it would be a nicer approach to having something > recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. +1 __

Re: LilyPond logo?

Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. I think it would be a nicer approach to having something recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. For example, simply "Lp", with the "p" being in the normal dynamic f

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Logo test enclosed. Basically, the only one I'd fancy is No. 6, except the flower now looks like an explosion, or the splash of a stone thrown in water :-) Best, Si

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre My opinions: - #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more realistic (no overlappin

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:11:26 +0200 Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Plus pdf Bij far: Number 9, provided the lily lines are a bit thinner, and the leaves individually drawn. Printers today have resolutions of 600dpi and higher so no need for such a thick lines. Also, I don't think that drawing th

Re: LilyPond logo?

Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Logo test enclosed. > > Cheers, > Pierre > > 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > >> >> >> On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >> >> >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: >> >

Re: LilyPond logo?

Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > > > On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: > > >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: Andrew Bernard > > >

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> - Original Message - > >> From: Andrew Bernard > >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether > >>> lilypond is > >>>

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 7:50 AM, "Mark Knoop" wrote: >At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >>- Original Message - >>From: Andrew Bernard >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >>> lilypond is >>> ŒLilypond¹ or ŒLilyPond¹ or ŒLily Pond¹ or Œlilypond¹. That at l

Re: LilyPond logo?

>> >> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566750/ecology_flower_flowers_green_lily_nature_water-lily_icon#size=512 > > This icon is for sale at $1 ... … with a license saying: The Licensed Material may not be: * ... * Incorporated into a logo or other trademark https://www.ico

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? > > > > “softer”? shorter? narrower? Sorry, I don’t know what you mean ... > > Something similar to the waterlily logo at > > > https://www.iconfinde

Re: LilyPond logo?

> I still can't get pacman out of my mind ... you don't get that effect with > the colour graphic because the colours are wrong, but as soon as it goes > b&w ... > > Cheers, > Wol > As an long-time, avid pacman fan (although really more of a Ms. pacman guy), I submit that none of these designs loo

Re: LilyPond logo?

> Now, I don’t want to be seen as a curmudgeon, but I just knew this would > spin out into this sort of thing at the very start. > Sorry, but this post is setting off my curmudgeon-o-meter. As a person with a lot of experience in graphic design myself, I am sorry > to say that this whole busines

Re: LilyPond logo?

>> Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? > > “softer”? shorter? narrower? Sorry, I don’t know what you mean ... Something similar to the waterlily logo at https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566750/ecology_flower_flowers_green_lily_nature_water-lily_icon#size=512

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 22:59 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a so

Re: LilyPond logo?

> But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is > a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less > detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? Werner ___

Re: LilyPond logo?

From: Henning Hraban Ramm Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 21:40:23 +0200 > > Am 2016-08-05 um 19:29 schrieb Noeck : > >>> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon >> >> This one is a well-des

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 2016-08-05 um 19:29 schrieb Noeck : >> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon > > This one is a well-designed icon (IMHO). Thank you, that’s what I had in mind when I read the OP’s question. Unfortunately we can’t use it. Greetlings, H

Re: LilyPond logo?

The problem is the black lilyleaf looks like pacman. I notice that the more the split in the leaf is rotated to point down, the less it looks like a mouth (so the less it looks like pacman). The alternative - two leaves - feels unnatural. Cheers, Wol On 05/08/16 10:05, Malte Meyn wrote: Am

Re: LilyPond logo?

I like the first and last ones. The first is closer to the web graphic, but I think I prefer the last one. I still can't get pacman out of my mind ... you don't get that effect with the colour graphic because the colours are wrong, but as soon as it goes b&w ... Cheers, Wol On 05/08/16 13:4

Re: LilyPond logo?

> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon This one is a well-designed icon (IMHO). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >> - Original Message - >> From: Andrew Bernard >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >>> lilypond is >>> 'Lilypond' or 'LilyPond' or 'Lily Pond' or 'lilypond'.

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, @ Simon, Malte, Davide and Hraban, Thanks !! And yes, I definitely have to stylized the petals. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-05 17:09 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Luc Gauthier : > Hi Andrew, > > > I still do not see why the web graphic waterlily has suddenly been > assumed > > to be the lilypond ‘logo’.

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew, > I still do not see why the web graphic waterlily has suddenly been assumed > to be the lilypond ‘logo’. To my knowledge it is the only graphic representation of the LilyPond project. I think it sort of made its way as the official unofficial logo. > One could always say that I am fr

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200 Malte Meyn wrote: But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Yes, si

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200 Malte Meyn wrote: > But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a > combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, > only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Yes, simplicity is better. However, this looses the

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew (et al.), > Logos are for branding and marketing. Why do we need one? Because we want to brand and market LilyPond/Lilypond/Lily Pond. ;) Like it or not, wider acceptance and use of the application — which is a stated goal of many of its users and developers, and an implied goal of m

Re: LilyPond logo?

At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >- Original Message - >From: Andrew Bernard >> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >> lilypond is >> ‘Lilypond’ or ‘LilyPond’ or ‘Lily Pond’ or ‘lilypond’. That at least >> needs to be straightened out. > >LilyPond

Re: LilyPond logo?

- Original Message - From: Andrew Bernard I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether lilypond is ‘Lilypond’ or ‘LilyPond’ or ‘Lily Pond’ or ‘lilypond’. That at least needs to be straightened out. LilyPond. Check the front page of the website. -- Phil Holme

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hello Simon, and Lilyponders, I agree with you Simon. Now, I don’t want to be seen as a curmudgeon, but I just knew this would spin out into this sort of thing at the very start. As a person with a lot of experience in graphic design myself, I am sorry to say that this whole business is regretta

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 2016-08-05 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > Here's tests with the different proposition. > I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. While I like the bold stylized look of the other attempts, I find your version most suitable with regard to the typographical focus of Lil

Re: LilyPond logo?

2016-08-05 14:57 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: >> Here's tests with the different proposition. >> I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. > > Wow, I like yours a lot. As I said in the other sub-thread, we should > designate the task o

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 2016-08-05 14:56, Malte Meyn wrote: Am 05.08.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Alexander Kobel: Looking at the "original" picture from a distance, I perceive the center as only one colored patch. Would you mind trying a version with just one dot in the center? I used the five dots because the center of

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Here's tests with the different proposition. I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. That’s nice too. A bit more vivid than my “I’ve never really used inkscape before but the star tool is nice” experiments ;) Did you draw thi

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: > Hi All, > > Here's tests with the different proposition. > I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. Wow, I like yours a lot. As I said in the other sub-thread, we should designate the task of finding a logo to a small group

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 10:43 schrieb Malte Meyn: > Am 04.08.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: >>> Does lilypond actually need visual >>> branding? Are we trying to increase market share with a logo? > > I think it would be nice to have. As I said in

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Alexander Kobel: Looking at the "original" picture from a distance, I perceive the center as only one colored patch. Would you mind trying a version with just one dot in the center? I used the five dots because the center of a flower has much detail. A single d

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, Here's tests with the different proposition. I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-05 14:36 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel : > Malte, > > I think you did a really nice job there. However, I can't help but be > reminded of > > https://de.wikipedia.org/wik

Re: LilyPond logo?

Malte, I think you did a really nice job there. However, I can't help but be reminded of https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:3_schwarze_Punkte_auf_gelbem_Grund_2.svg by the dots in the center... (For those in non-German-speaking countries: that's the symbol blind people wear in public as a wa

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:01 schrieb Malte Meyn: [...] But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). I like it! Marc __

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 13:52 schrieb Marc Hohl: Am 05.08.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3 mos

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3 most. +1 Marc _

Re: LilyPond logo?

> Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! > logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the > outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3 most. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Wols Lists: On 05/08/16 05:15, tyronicus wrote: The vectorized image looks very good. It'd be nice, though, to have some sort of "icon" logo in true black and white. Maybe something like the attached? It's an Inkscape svg if anyone wants to mess with it. lp.png

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 04.08.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: Does lilypond actually need visual branding? Are we trying to increase market share with a logo? I think it would be nice to have. As I said in my first post, an eye catcher would be nice. This idea ca

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 05/08/16 05:15, tyronicus wrote: > The vectorized image looks very good. It'd be nice, though, to have some sort > of "icon" logo in true black and white. Maybe something like the attached? > It's an Inkscape svg if anyone wants to mess with it. > > lp.png

Re: LilyPond logo?

The vectorized image looks very good. It'd be nice, though, to have some sort of "icon" logo in true black and white. Maybe something like the attached? It's an Inkscape svg if anyone wants to mess with it. lp.png lp.svg

Re: LilyPond logo?

I appreciated the b/w line version more. Regards Am 04.08.2016 um 15:59 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Ralph, Here you go. 2016-08-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ralph Palmer >: On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider mailto:pierre.schneider

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: >There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily >graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. I >am not sure that this is the formal lilypond logo, is it? Has that been >decided or discussed? In any case,

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew, 2016-08-04 15:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily > graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. > ... See : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LilyPond-logo.png ... > Colour is no good -

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Ralph, Here you go. 2016-08-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ralph Palmer : > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider < > pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here's a gray scale version. >> Lighter by far. >> >> \version "2.19.46" >> \include "logo-gray.ily" >> >> %% Syntax is \ma

Re: LilyPond logo?

There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. I am not sure that this is the formal lilypond logo, is it? Has that been decided or discussed? In any case, does it convey the brand clearly and recognisably?

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a gray scale version. > Lighter by far. > > \version "2.19.46" > \include "logo-gray.ily" > > %% Syntax is \markup\logoGray #size > %% Test: > \markup\logoGray #5 > > I've already tried an ou

Re: LilyPond logo?

Here's a gray scale version. Lighter by far. \version "2.19.46" \include "logo-gray.ily" %% Syntax is \markup\logoGray #size %% Test: \markup\logoGray #5 I've already tried an outlined b/w version but I'm not satisfied with it yet. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-04 13:26 GMT+02:00 bb : > If any logo,

Re: LilyPond logo?

If any logo, I prefer the b/w version! I never print music sheets with a colour printer. Regards Am 04.08.2016 um 13:17 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Malte, Hi All Here's a first attempt to produce a vectorialised logo. The file uses the new v2.19 markup path syntax. I've reduced the num

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 03.08.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier: 2016-08-03 11:03 GMT-04:00 Andrew Bernard : The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance problematical. I know it’s difficult but does that mean one cannot try? Logo design is fraught with difficulty, and you w

Re: LilyPond logo?

2016-08-03 11:03 GMT-04:00 Andrew Bernard : > The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance > problematical. So as with most artistic and identity related questions. :-( > Logo design is fraught with difficulty, and you will inevitably end up with > something half the

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Malte, The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance problematical. Take for example the massive amount of work that went into, just by way of pertinent example, the Creative Commons logo: https://creativecommons.org/2015/03/25/a-masterwork-in-simplicity-the-story-

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 03.08.2016 um 16:13 schrieb Malte Meyn: b/w vector graphic as a logo for LilyPond This could also be part of the Feta font. \markup \musicglyph #"logo.waterlily" ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Malte, > wouldn’t it be nice to have an official b/w vector graphic as a logo for > LilyPond? Any opinions? I *love* this idea! Currently, the standard Colophon in all of my scores is …but I would *love* to have a little Lilypond logo there! Thanks! Kieren.