Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl > wrote: But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That's why each voice has i

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl wrote: > But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I > want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why > each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And > why is it only r

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Hi Kieren, the output has indeed only one dot. But at least here it puts the dot in the upper staff space (where the e'' is) and not next to the rest. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Hi Cynthia, > I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them > issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags. Not at all… I can think of about a half-dozen other ways to make that happen in Lilypond. This would be my preference, since it woul

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

> On Feb 7, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > Hi Cynthia, > >> In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation >> dots? That just doesn’t seem right. > > No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit > that there are

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 08:49:52PM -0600, Cynthia Karl wrote: > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:24:30 -0800 > > From: "Mark Stephen Mrotek" > > To: "'Cynthia Karl'" , > > Subject: RE: Problem with r2. in two

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

Hi Cynthia, > In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation > dots? That just doesn’t seem right. No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit that there are two voices at the same time — otherwise, how would the reader know? Cons

RE: Problem with r2. in two voices

> > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:24:30 -0800 > From: "Mark Stephen Mrotek" > To: "'Cynthia Karl'" , > Subject: RE: Problem with r2. in two voices > Message-ID: <00c201d04346$5ef30160$1cd90420$@ca.rr.com>

Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

On 8/02/15 12:46 PM, Cynthia Karl wrote: I don’t understand two things about the following snippet: \version "2.19.15" Aa = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } Ab = \relative c'' {\oneVoice r2. } \score { \new Staff << \time 3/4 \new Voice \Aa

RE: Problem with r2. in two voices

Cynthia, Actually there are two r2. rests, one in each voice. Replace one with s2. and it shall disappear. Mark From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Cynthia Karl Sent: Saturday, February 07,