Hi all (and especially Urs),
I've been working with Scholarly and Latex -- the usage-example on the
initial-latex-package branch works perfectly, but the inp file is different
to what is currently exported by the Scholarly package (which I'm sure you
know).
An example from the initial-latex
Urs,
The "temp-print-message" branch worked perfectly first time. You are
amazing! One small problem for me though -- the output is rendering the
measure and beat with the lilyglyphs ({1}{4.\,\crotchet}). How can I get it
back to just {1}{4} without the lilyglyph? I know I've seen how to do it
Hi Urs,
Thanks very much for all that information. I'll check out the
"temp-print-message" branch and let you know how I go.
All the best,
Craig
On 8 March 2018 at 02:12, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> sorry for the delay, but I had quite reduced capacities during
Hi Craig,
sorry for the delay, but I had quite reduced capacities during the past
week.
I'm even more sorry to inform you that what you experience is "expected
behaviour" and the result of incomplete implementation :-(
The exported annotations put a number of information items (including
music engraving
% (clearly only useful when using the package together with LilyPond)
\newcommand{\lilypondIssue}[6][]{
\annotation[#1]{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}
{LilyPond Issue}}
% Intended for general questions that are tied to musical items.
\newcommand{\annotateQuestion}[6][]{
\annotation[#1]{
Hi Craig,
Am 23.02.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Craig Dabelstein:
Hi Lilyponders,
I'm having a minor problem with getting my ScholarLy inp file to work
with Latex. The Latex output for each annotation looks like this:
\criticalRemark
[grob={DynamicText},
grob-location={Can't display grob
Hi Lilyponders,
I'm having a minor problem with getting my ScholarLy inp file to work with
Latex. The Latex output for each annotation looks like this:
\criticalRemark
[grob={DynamicText},
grob-location={Can't display grob location yet},
grob-type={DynamicText},