Hi, Joe
On 25/02/2008, Joe Neeman wrote:
Sorry, I missed this email. Is this still an issue? If so, could you
send the example that fails in an email? I tried 2 examples given by
Paul in this thread and they both took up 2 pages with latest git. But
maybe I didn't find the right
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 01:59 -0800, Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear All,
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of Paul's
examples in this thread using versions 2.11.32 and 2.11.37. The first
one with headers takes two pages on both versions.
and *three* pages on
2.11.37.
Just a reminder of the discussion. :-)
-Risto
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaks-related-to-header-size-tp13679136p14797572.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
If you want to discuss issues with the latest development releases, I'd
recommend to use the lilypond-devel mailing list. I have forwarded
this email there.
/Mats
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear All,
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Has this issue taken some steps backwards? I compiled both of
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaks-related-to-header-size-tp13679136p14613756.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
2007/11/21, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, something must have broken with
our mirroring process to linuxaudio.org
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, something must have broken with
our mirroring process to linuxaudio.org
Found it.
Thanks!
Paul Scott wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just release 2.11.35.
It solves both problems in this thread!
Thanks!
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Francisco Vila wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/21, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's available.
it's already on lilypond.org, however, something
2007/11/17, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count = #some-number
in the paper block, which should make these things easier to control.
I've just release 2.11.35.
I've noticed that most examples, take some more vertical space
(mozart: 5 iso.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/17, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count = #some-number
in the paper block, which should make these things easier to control.
I've just release 2.11.35.
I'll be happy to test it when it's
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:07:42 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/17, Joe Neeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PPPS: In the next version, you will be able to set page-count =
#some-number in the paper block, which should make these things easier to
control.
I've just release 2.11.35.
I've noticed that
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Due to time constraints I wasn't able to read the new documentation at
all (you are a hero, BTW, for investing so much time into this!), thus
I can't suggest a possible location for inclusion. Maybe it's not
necessary at all since lilypond's layout process is already
Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
documentation.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
documentation.
Really? I skimmed through it, and it looked like a discussion about a
current bug. Were you thinking of sticking it in a @refbugs
Warning: long-winded explanation follows. [...]
This is an excellent description which should probably go into the
documentation.
Really? I skimmed through it, and it looked like a discussion about a
current bug.
I meant the description of lilypond's behaviour w.r.t. formatting a
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:27:16 Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Hi again,
Paul's example looks very familiar. :-)
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 Joe Neeman-2 wrote:
If you can create a bad example without any titles, that example will
probably
still cause problems. If you can send such an example to the
be eagerly waiting for the 2.11.35. :-)
Best Regards,
Risto
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaks-related-to-header-size-tf4781502.html#a13701420
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:00:02 Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear Han-Wen and all,
2007/11/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
Thanks for the info. I was just about to write a
{
\Lyrics
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)
}
}
}
% Snip END
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaks-related-to-header-size-tf4781502.html#a13720999
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User
I also have (just last night) had a similar vertical spacing problem
(2.11.34).
I had a piece covering two pages, the majority on the first page, and
the page break was where
I wanted it. Then I change a bit of the spacing of a text markup
(extra-offset) and I lost one of the
systems on the
Jeff Elliott wrote:
I also have (just last night) had a similar vertical spacing problem
(2.11.34).
I had a piece covering two pages, the majority on the first page, and
the page break was where
I wanted it. Then I change a bit of the spacing of a text markup
(extra-offset) and I lost one of
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:58:45 Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.34
In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
doesn't take as much
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:58:45 Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.34
In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
doesn't
2007/11/11, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks very much. Sorry I missed the bug report.
Will there be a 2.11.35?
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/11/11, Paul Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks very much. Sorry I missed the bug report.
Will there be a 2.11.35?
Yes. There is finally light at the end of the GUB tunnel, so
hopefully this or next week.
Great! Thanks,
Paul
2.11.34
In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
doesn't take as much vertical space as one system.
I have worked for
Michael David Crawford wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
2.11.34
In this example there is clearly room for another system on the first
page. Removing anything from the header will allow another system to
move to the first page. Whatever is removed from the header clearly
doesn't take as much
28 matches
Mail list logo
