Re: \articulate command and rit. was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 147, Issue 102

2015-02-15 Thread Thomas Morley
Speaking only for myself: I regard LilyPond as a music-_typesetting_-program. I don't care much about midi. Nevertheless, the NR clearly states: A MIDI file is a series of notes in a number of tracks. It is not an actual sound file [...] Pieces of music can be converted to MIDI files, so you

Re: [Announce] Boulez anyone?

2015-02-15 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-02-13 21:38 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com: 2015-02-13 12:15 GMT+01:00 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de: Thanks a lot Abraham, it is just great to see all these styles. You know that, but for all who don't: straight flags and other flag styles can also be easily set in

Re: lengthening broken ties

2015-02-15 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Werner, On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote: If it's convenient, have a look at the attached patch/sketch. It adds a property, minimum-length-left-broken, which lets you adjust broken bits that start a line. Excellent! What an improvement with just

Re: Cue notes with lyrics?

2015-02-15 Thread Rutger Hofman
On 02/14/2015 02:48 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-02-14 13:27 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman rut...@cs.vu.nl: Good morning list, I would like to create cue notes with lyrics. I added lyric-event to the Score.quotedCueEventTypes but that gave me no lyrics. How should I go about this? Thanks, Rutger

Re: Line Length

2015-02-15 Thread Robin Bannister
William Marchant wrote: How can I control the length of the [bottom] line Have a look at answers in a similar thread last July: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-07/msg00341.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-07/msg00371.html Cheers, Robin

Re: lengthening broken ties

2015-02-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
If it's convenient, have a look at the attached patch/sketch. It adds a property, minimum-length-left-broken, which lets you adjust broken bits that start a line. Excellent! What an improvement with just a few lines of code! Thanks a lot. Now that the change is in the repository, I've

Re: rit. in Midi - was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 137, Issue 62

2015-02-15 Thread David Sumbler
From: Patrick Karl patrickk...@me.com Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:18:49 -0600 I think the most disturbiing thing is that \articulate is interpreting rit. to mean ritenuto rather than ritardando, which I think is the most common interpretation of rit.. It would be great if the tempo

\articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

2015-02-15 Thread Cynthia Karl
The Notation Manual seems to allow a naked duration to represent the last pitch with that duration. The following extract from the NM shows what I'm talking about: (you'd think that since we're only on p6, it would be easy to find the explicit permission to do this, but I can't find it.

repeat tremolo - warning message

2015-02-15 Thread MING TSANG
lily ponders, I ran the following lily code and got a warning message.The first and 2nd \repeat tremolo are the same except the pitch. (1)  Why the second \repeat tremolo return a warning message.?(2)  How can I adjust the \repeat tremolo so that it display in the middle of two pitches - ie

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

2015-02-15 Thread Phil Holmes
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: MING TSANG To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:48 PM Subject: repeat tremolo - warning message lily ponders, I ran the following lily code and

Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Son_V
Hi all, I want to make http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n171918/Beam01.jpg But using \autobeamon, \autobeamoff IO get http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n171918/Beam02.jpg Where am I wrong? Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Klaus Blum
It seems that you have to apply \autoBeamOff BEFORE a beam group starts. You can manually start/stop beams by using brackets: % -- \version 2.18.2 \relative c'' { c4 b a \autoBeamOff g16[ b] a8 } % -- Cheers, Klaus

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi, \relative c'' { c4 b a g16 b a8\noBeam } should do fine too. Cheers, Pierre 2015-02-15 18:15 GMT+01:00 Klaus Blum benbigno...@gmx.de: It seems that you have to apply \autoBeamOff BEFORE a beam group starts. You can manually start/stop beams by using brackets: %

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

2015-02-15 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-02-15 16:56 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: MING TSANG To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:48 PM Subject: repeat tremolo - warning message

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I want to make http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n171918/Beam01.jpg But using \autobeamon, \autobeamoff IO get Capitalization is important: it's \autoBeamOn and \autoBeamOff. --David

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Son_V
I'm using Frescobaldi, so I can't make this kind of mistakes, :-) , I wrote these commands meaning I'm using them in the right way ... I'm writing a score from a printed one made in the beginning of the '900 ... -- View this message in context:

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using Frescobaldi, so I can't make this kind of mistakes, :-) , I wrote these commands meaning I'm using them in the right way ... I'm writing a score from a printed one made in the beginning of the '900 ... If you

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

2015-02-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
Hello, the support for standalone durations was one of the first (and most important?) changes made in 2.19 (see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index.html. But indeed, it seems to be a bug if \articulate can't handle them. Yours, Simon Am 15.02.2015 15:26, schrieb

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Son_V
THANKS. What I was missing was to put the note between brackets, like in your example: [ b] ... Thanks again. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Uncorrect-beams-tp171918p171926.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

2015-02-15 Thread ul
Am 2015-02-15 15:19, schrieb RomanticStrings: What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

2015-02-15 Thread Thomas Morley
2015-02-15 18:25 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de: Hello, the support for standalone durations was one of the first (and most important?) changes made in 2.19 (see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index.html

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

2015-02-15 Thread RomanticStrings
What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox and Google Drive account. It seems like Git doesn't

Re: Uncorrect (?) beams

2015-02-15 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi, What I was missing was to put the note between brackets, like in your example: [ b]” This may not be the best way of thinking about it. Rather, think that you need to put the [ immediately after the first note in the beam group, and the ] immediately after the last note in the beam

Re: \sustainOff\sustainOn produces inconsistent MIDI results

2015-02-15 Thread bensonby
I have the same problem too. As a quick solution, I split the note into two with a tie, one for sustainOff and one for sustainOn. If there are no real solutions, I guess someone may write a function to automatically achieve this, say, \sustainOffOn -- View this message in context:

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

2015-02-15 Thread Simon Albrecht
Am 15.02.2015 21:19, schrieb RomanticStrings: What is the benefit of using Git? I understand that it keeps track of changes, so you can check your log and even retrieve previous versions(?). I use my home MacBook Pro and my work (sacred music director) PC laptop, and I have both a Dropbox and

Re: Git/Lilypond workflow

2015-02-15 Thread Tom Cloyd
Thanks for this thread. I'm find this of real interest to me, for several reasons. I've had the question myself, and turned away from Git-engagement because I couldn't see the light. I'm off to read the blog post. Should be interesting! Tom On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:16 PM, u...@openlilylib.org

Re: repeat tremolo - warning message

2015-02-15 Thread MING TSANG
Thank you, Thomas PhilImmanuel,Ming On Sunday, February 15, 2015 1:06 PM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-02-15 16:56 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1444 -- Phil Holmes - Original Message

CueDuringWithClef problems

2015-02-15 Thread Menu Jacques
Hello folks, I can’t get the slurs in « Largo_Flute » nor R2 in the argument to \cueDuringWithClef to be displayed in the following example. Here is the log contents: Starting lilypond 2.19.15 [CueVoiceExample.ly]... Traitement de «

Re: lengthening broken ties

2015-02-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
In bar 2 you can see the effect of `minimum-length-after-break'. You mean bar 4--bar 2 is the default. Of course. Typo. Any chance to fix this? BTW, if you compare bar 2 with bar 6, you see exactly the opposite effect w.r.t. the default tie length: with a time signature the tie looks