Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 19:37:54 (-0700), BGM wrote: > Thanks for you interest, fellas. > > I downgraded lilypond to version 2.19.36-1 and everything works as expected > - that is, it compiles any of my scores normally in just a second or two. > > My problems were all with the latest lilypond

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Stephen MacNeil writes: > Hi David > > I notice both > > ^(_(d) > > > and > > ^(_(d)) > > > work. The last with )) > > > is one way "more" correct? Slurs don't nest. The current implementation does not complain about spurious slur starts/ends. It's only when the

Cross staff dynamics

I continually run into the problem where I have dynamics wth hairpins across phrases which cross staves, causing lilypond to throw the 'cross fingers' error repeatedly in a cascade. Despite crossing fingers (it is a well known fact I dislike this error expression) the output places the dynamics

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

Thanks for you interest, fellas. I downgraded lilypond to version 2.19.36-1 and everything works as expected - that is, it compiles any of my scores normally in just a second or two. My problems were all with the latest lilypond 2.19.44-1 version. I am using Frescibaldo 2.19 on Windows 7 Pro

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

Hi Gabriel-Marie, What platform are you using? Linux, Windows, Mac? Can you tell us that, and the OS version? Which Frescobaldi are you running - platform distribution, or a build from source? Can you obtain timings from the command line to compare with Frescobaldi? I have observed the

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 15:15:42 (-0700), BGM wrote: > Well, it seems like it hangs on just starting lilypond. (and, as I've > mentioned, I didn't have this problem with version 2.18) > > As soon as it gets past this line... > So, this line takes 99% of the time in the progressbar: > Starting

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Hi David I notice both ^(_(d) and ^(_(d)) work. The last with )) is one way "more" correct? Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: appoggiatura problem

Encountering this bug for the first time is a right of passage. It will probably not be fixed in our lifetimes. Congratulations, you are now a Lilyponder! -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/appoggiatura-problem-tp192328p192353.html Sent from the User

Re: GSoC update; Q's about final/draft modes, and triggering footnotes

Absolutely - in fact, using the presence of offset to indicate *I'm a footnote* was just a practical solution since I am sure some projects won't *always* want annotations to become footnotes, and with this check wouldn't need to specify explicitly *when* and *when not*. However, maybe it would

Re: PDF author metadata

On 07.07.2016 09:43, Andrew Bernard wrote: I was putting the custom PDF fields in the paper block, not the header block (lilypond keeps quite about this). In a \header and \paper block, just like on top level, you can perform any assignment you want. Only question is if the value will be

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

Well, it seems like it hangs on just starting lilypond. (and, as I've mentioned, I didn't have this problem with version 2.18) As soon as it gets past this line... So, this line takes 99% of the time in the progressbar: Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.44 [whatever.ly]... then all the rest

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

Stephen MacNeil writes: > \set doubleSlurs = ##t > > (d) Or just ^(_( d) since two slurs with explicit direction will both be kept around. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

"Br. Gabriel-Marie | SSPX" writes: > Recently I updated my lilypond from 2.18 to 2.19.44. I am using > Frescobaldi for the GUI. > It used to take only a few seconds to compile a score, but now it > takes at least 28 seconds every time. > This is the case even if I don't

Re: offset for lyrics does not offset the lyric hyphens

2016-07-07 18:23 GMT+02:00 Br. Gabriel-Marie | SSPX : > Mr. Morley, > > Hey! That's it! Thank you very much! It works just like I imagined it > could! > > The only thing I can complain about with this is that it takes forever > (nearly 30 seconds, anyway; normally it only

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

Okay, when I try exactly that, I still get 28.8 seconds for compile time. Moving the \new statements does not change anything for me. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Long-Compile-time-with-version-2-19-44-tp192343p192346.html Sent from the User mailing

Re: Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:25 PM, BGM [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n192343...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Recently I updated my lilypond from 2.18 to 2.19.44. I am using > Frescobaldi for the GUI. > It used to take only a few seconds to compile a score, but now it takes at > least 28 seconds every

Long Compile time with version 2.19.44

Recently I updated my lilypond from 2.18 to 2.19.44. I am using Frescobaldi for the GUI. It used to take only a few seconds to compile a score, but now it takes at least 28 seconds every time. This is the case even if I don't create a midi. Am I missing something, or is this the case for

Re: Multiple slurs between chords

An hour ago, I wrote: > (In the [attached] larger file, I was able to put an explicit \oneVoice > overriding \voiceTwo and imitate the printed version, but this only > worked for the upper staff, and not in my excerpt.) > > Can anyone suggest the correct way forward? I figured something out;

RE:Multiple slurs between chords

\set doubleSlurs = ##t (d) other part \set doubleSlurs = ##t 4.(4) HTH Stephen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: multi-mark-engraver not working?

Hi Nik, On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nik Repka wrote: > Hello all: > > I'm using code from this snippet: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00157.html to > create two marks that are split from one another over a system break. Many > people on

Re: PDF author metadata

On 2016-07-07 5:38 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: > The standard does not take into account that the author of the document > might be different from the author of the __content__ in the document? > > What's more relevant when you search a document? The person who created > the document in a computer

Re: PDF author metadata

David Wright writes: > On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 00:52:53 (-0700), Andrew Bernard wrote: >> This may be the standard, but it is woefully ambiguous, and text-centric. >> In the case of a music composition, is is the composer or the engraver? Is >> the ‘document’ the music,

Re: PDF author metadata

On Thu 07 Jul 2016 at 00:52:53 (-0700), Andrew Bernard wrote: > This may be the standard, but it is woefully ambiguous, and text-centric. > In the case of a music composition, is is the composer or the engraver? Is > the ‘document’ the music, or the setting of it? Neither. It's the PDF document

multi-mark-engraver not working?

Hello all: I'm using code from this snippet: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00157.html to create two marks that are split from one another over a system break. Many people on the web are reporting that it works perfectly for them, but for me, the two marks remain

Re: appoggiatura problem

Many tahnks! Have understood the problem. Regards Am 07.07.2016 um 17:42 schrieb David Kastrup: bb writes: I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile that attached

Re: offset for lyrics does not offset the lyric hyphens

Mr. Morley, Hey! That's it! Thank you very much! It works just like I imagined it could! The only thing I can complain about with this is that it takes forever (nearly 30 seconds, anyway; normally it only takes a few seconds) to compile. Here is the error log I get for your script:

Re: Remove staff in one particular section

Am 7. Juli 2016 17:32:47 MESZ, schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros : >Can I remove a staff in a single section? Like \removeEmptyStaves but >not for the whole score. In my case it is just for the last system. > > >Sorry if this topic was already discussed, I searched the

Re: appoggiatura problem

bb writes: > I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an > appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile > that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time > definition. in the second measure/bar it

Re: Remove staff in one particular section

Caio Giovaneti de Barros writes: > Can I remove a staff in a single section? Like \removeEmptyStaves but > not for the whole score. In my case it is just for the last system. > > > Sorry if this topic was already discussed, I searched the manuals and > archive but I'm in a

appoggiatura problem

I tried to write a treble line and a bass line. The treble line has an appoggiatura at the beginning, the bass line has not. If you compile that attached snippet you will find the appoggiatura before the time definition. in the second measure/bar it is not. There is also a strange treble clef

Remove staff in one particular section

Can I remove a staff in a single section? Like \removeEmptyStaves but not for the whole score. In my case it is just for the last system. Sorry if this topic was already discussed, I searched the manuals and archive but I'm in a bit of a hurry now to be honest.

Re: PDF author metadata

Il giorno gio 7 lug 2016 alle 9:52, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: On this topic, can we add ‘engraver’ as pdfengraver to have it in the custom PDF fields? This is issue 3820: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3820/#e957

Re: Alla breve notation in Kyrie (2) from Bach's Hohe Messe

Le jeudi 07 juillet 2016 à 13:48 +0200, Jogchum Reitsma a écrit : > Hi all, > > In the second Kyrie from J.S. Bach's Hohe Messe, the time signature > is 4/4, but the bars are filled with 8 quarter notes or its > equivalent in time. > I cannot find in the documentation or last years list archive

Re: Alla breve notation in Kyrie (2) from Bach's Hohe Messe

Am 07.07.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jogchum Reitsma: In the second Kyrie from J.S. Bach's Hohe Messe, the time signature is 4/4, but the bars are filled with 8 quarter notes or its equivalent in time. Are you sure you meant 4/4 which is shown as C? Bach uses the cut C (alla breve). \set

Alla breve notation in Kyrie (2) from Bach's Hohe Messe

Hi all, In the second Kyrie from J.S. Bach's Hohe Messe, the time signature is 4/4, but the bars are filled with 8 quarter notes or its equivalent in time. I cannot find in the documentation or last years list archive how to code that in lilypond. \set timeSignatureFraction = #'(2.2) which

Re: PDF author metadata

On 07/07/16 08:38, Christopher R. Maden wrote: On 07/07/2016 02:23 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Federico Bruni writes: Who should be in your opinion the author of a LilyPond score PDF? The composer or the typesetter? Usefulness does not come into play here as long as there

Re: PDF author metadata

Il giorno gio 7 lug 2016 alle 11:41, David Kastrup ha scritto: Federico Bruni writes: Il giorno gio 7 lug 2016 alle 9:23, David Kastrup ha scritto: Usefulness does not come into play here as long as there is a standard. The PDF standard

Re: PDF author metadata

Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno gio 7 lug 2016 alle 9:23, David Kastrup ha > scritto: >> Usefulness does not come into play here as long as there is a >> standard. >> The PDF standard states: > > Where did you take this? PDF reference manual downloaded from

Re: PDF author metadata

Il giorno gio 7 lug 2016 alle 9:23, David Kastrup ha scritto: Usefulness does not come into play here as long as there is a standard. The PDF standard states: Where did you take this? Key TypeValue Titletext string (Optional; PDF 1.1) The document’s

Re: PDF author metadata

This may be the standard, but it is woefully ambiguous, and text-centric. In the case of a music composition, is is the composer or the engraver? Is the ‘document’ the music, or the setting of it? Setting Author to the name of the composer does not make it clear to anybody who the composer is.

Re: PDF author metadata

Oops. It would help if I paid closed attention to what I am doing. I was putting the custom PDF fields in the paper block, not the header block (lilypond keeps quite about this). Ignore the noise, and apologies. Andrew On 7 July 2016 at 5:25:49 PM, Andrew Bernard (andrew.bern...@gmail.com)

Re: PDF author metadata

On 07/07/2016 02:23 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Federico Bruni writes: Who should be in your opinion the author of a LilyPond score PDF? The composer or the typesetter? Usefulness does not come into play here as long as there is a standard. The PDF standard states: Key

Re: PDF author metadata

Hi Federico, How does one view the additional PDF metadata such as created by ‘pdfcomposer’ in the header in Linux? Indeed, I cannot see this in Adobe Acrobat Pro DC (on Mac) either? Where is it stored and how to display it? Currently using 2.19.44 to try this out. Andrew

Re: PDF author metadata

Federico Bruni writes: > Hi all > > I'd like to edit this page of the documentation: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/creating-pdf-metadata.html > > to add what I learned here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2016-07/msg8.html > > I