Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 09:38 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/18/16 4:00 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: >>> >Chris, >>> > >>> >Here's a patch. But as Werner pointed out, it's not quite done yet. I >

Re: Building Lilypond on Ubuntu 16.04

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 at 10:14 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > What I did was: > > > > $ sudo ln -s /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config > /usr/include/freetype2/config > > $ sudo sed -i 's|/freetype2$|/freetype2/freetype|' > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc > > $

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote: > > That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online > compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly > even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it > already) are of

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 27 Sep 2016 03:59, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > At a brief look over GUB, the really big question in my mind is why on > > earth it seems to want to build *everything*. > > It wants to be _able_ to build everything, like autoconf. Fine. But Autoconf doesn't ship with makefiles

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 27 Sep 2016 18:31, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:. > > > A Lilypond build tool for all platforms to which someone's added half > > a dozen extra unrelated targets (possibly very large ones such as > > OpenOffice) = a terrible idea. > > Thanks! GUB was the first to be so generic

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

The test case isn't ideal (maybe is better than , but I think the dotted minim a needs an individual dot... On 29 Oct 2016 20:21, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > > On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrot

Re: request for programming advice

BB that is beautiful On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 11:47 bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> wrote: > May be that is what you lokk for? > > http://www.vexflow.com/ > > http://www.vexflow.com/vextab/tutorial.html > > Regards BB > > On 07.11.2016 12:25, Chris Yate wrote

Re: request for programming advice

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 11:10 Gerard McConnell wrote: > Hello, > About 10 years ago I wrote some Java applets which allow a user to test > their understanding of intervals ( > http://homepage.eircom.net/~gerfmcc/interval.html and triads ( >

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 25 Oct 2016 3:36 p.m., "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > > > > At any rate, I have some results from Chris's test file. I have adjusted > the text to contain my assessment of the results. Please let me know if > you disagree with any of my assessments. > > chord-dots-limit = 1

Re: Photoscore

Hi Andrew Apologies in advance, I'm going to be *that guy*... ;-) For what it’s worth, I’m a huge fan of Linux, Lilypond and Muse and all the other wonderful **free** tools that we have available BUT if I was in any sense interested in working with a commercial publisher – especially for

Re: Photoscore

.ch> wrote: > Hello Chris, > > How does Finale behave in the commercial publishing industry, compared to > Sibelius, in terms of market share? > > Le 28 nov. 2016 à 00:03, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi Andrew > > > Apologies in advance, I'm

Re: Photoscore

On 27 Nov 2016 23:49, "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.11.2016 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Yate: >> >> Hi Jacques, >> >> I don't know... It seems ridiculous that they have no common format - but it's a relatively tiny

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 16:13, "Johan Vromans" wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:48:59 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > > > The big houses more or less *exclusively* use Sibelius and Finale in > > parallel, with a very low share still using SCORE and an actually tiny

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 20:12, "David Wright" wrote: > > > The most important thing in this situation is not to panic. > It's quite possible that only two things have been altered: > the Master Boot Record may have been overwritten, and the > partition types may have been

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 21:13, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > Depending on the importance of the data, Well, that's the knub of it. The ideal situation is that everything you can't afford to lose is stored off site - possibly multiple times. Github, Bitbucket, or other means. I try my best...

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 23:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> > > > I don't keep up to date on this stuff, so I'm no authority. All I know is > > that I used to load XP into a VM using parallels and did not ecnounter such > > a problem. > > You don't "encounter" licensing problems unless you

Re: Photoscore

On 28 Nov 2016 09:11, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > > > > > You mean, if it doesn't already own you. My father is a retired > professor of theoretical physics who is still publishing. He received a > final draft of such a paper back from a physics journal along with > instructions

Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 at 18:03 tisimst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <[hidden > email] > wrote: > > It's *legitimate* in all musical circles, though it's not *embraced* by > all. >

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

On 29 Oct 2016 04:39, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > > I have worked some more on the augmentation dot algorithms, including adding the directions (/DotsUp, /DotsDown). > > I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test, which is different from the current

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

On 2 Nov 2016 08:13, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > Does moving the dot-column-engraver to voice sort out the confusing > > horizontal spacing in these situations? First time I've seen that > > and it does interesting things to the positioning of dots. > > Alas, it doesn't work

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

On 2 Nov 2016 06:37, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > 1) The kievan dot for a notehead on a line moved to a space, when it > >should have stayed on a line. > > > > 2) When notes are displayed without a staff, the dot should stay on > >the same level as the notehead, but it

Re: New LilyPond website

On 11 Dec 2016 07:23, "David Kastrup" wrote: Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> I just don't think I am the best person for the job. >> >> Roper has finally posted something I agree with. > > Why this unwarranted hostility? His final design was sound, and I > think we

Re: New LilyPond website

Having now looked at it, though only on my phone, I quite like it. But I did have to scroll scroll scroll to read what would be about one page of content. What I saw was a very "sexy" marketing site for Lilypond, and I think it does it justice. However, as someone already sold on the tool, all I

Re: New LilyPond website

On 30 Nov 2016 01:00, "Tim McNamara" wrote: > > > The cosmetic appearance of the web site is most certainly an influential factor in expanding the "mindshare" of Lilypond. Completely agree. > Take me- I am a musician. I know nothing useful about C and it's variants,

Re: Photoscore

On 29 Nov 2016 13:40, "Karlin High" wrote: > > On 11/28/2016 12:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > I thought the Windows EULA protested against being subjected to a VM? > > Buy a Windows full-version retail license for the virtual machine and > you should be good to go. > >

Re: New LilyPond website

On 29 Nov 2016 01:33, "John Roper" wrote: > > I have thought about the no scripts idea, and I belive that right now, there are not many websites that do not use javascript for some functionality. Wordpress it's self is almost entirely built upon javascript and php and it

Re: Look what I found in the pond...

And which one's you, David? On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 at 10:03 David Kastrup wrote: > > < > http://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/rheinland/deutsche-maskenbildner-meisterschaft-duesseldorf-110~_v-gseagaleriexl.jpg > > > > The whole article for this makeup competition is at > < >

Re: Reducing staff numbers in LilyPond

Personally I think it's clearer to just use two staves, Treble and Bass. Many choral basses can't read treble clef, and tenors might sing the wrong pitch, as they're used to reading octave treble... Chris On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 at 14:50 Ken Williams wrote: > I have a choral

Re: Reducing staff numbers in LilyPond

On 16 Oct 2017 20:38, "Ken Williams" wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, David Wright wrote: > It strikes me that notating this unusual effect on one staff > increases ambiguity and the potential for mistakes, compared with > just

Re: Midi notes not stopping

On 29 Nov 2017 08:12, "David Kastrup" wrote: Gianmaria Lari writes: > wow!! > > Made some quick test (windows 10) and yes I have been able to reproduce the > issue. > > Ben is right, it goes away if you set tempo < 100. > > It also looks related to the

Re: Midi notes not stopping

On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 11:07 wrote: > Chris: > ... > > \score { > > \new Voice { \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"trumpet" > > \relative c'''{ > >\tempo 2 = 100 > >\relative e'' { e4 \tuplet 5/4 { e16 f fis g gis } } > > } > > } \layout{} \midi{} } >

Midi notes not stopping

Hi guys, I've searched a bit for hints on this and couldn't come up with anything relevant. I may be using the wrong search terms. This is a very short excerpt from a piece I'm writing where the midi playback is broken. It's not the end of the world for the finished product, but it is very

Re: double time signature problem

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 16:33 David Kastrup wrote: > David Wright writes: > > > BTW does the German used here sound as archaic as Coverdale's > > translation (Lift up your heads, O ye gates, and be ye lift up, > > ye everlasting doors, and the King of

Scheme programming pointers

Hi all, I can probably work a lot out on my own, but if someone could direct me to any Lilypond-specific Scheme tutorials that might help with the idea I'm thinking about, that would be super! My idea is to remove a lot of boilerplate for score creation. Thus I can have music defined as:

Re: Scheme programming pointers

.12.2017 um 20:16 schrieb Chris Yate: > > Hi all, > > I can probably work a lot out on my own, but if someone could direct me to > any Lilypond-specific Scheme tutorials that might help with the idea I'm > thinking about, that would be super! > > > https://scheme-book.urslisk

Re: Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

et 3/2 { c8-. r4 } R1 }>> } } [image: image.png] On Fri, 4 May 2018 at 14:33 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > This passage is a little tricky to write tidily on one staff, and I might > change the way this is done. But the placing of the low

Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

Hi guys, This passage is a little tricky to write tidily on one staff, and I might change the way this is done. But the placing of the lower tuplet bracket (covereing the quaver and crotchet rest) doesn't seem to help... \transpose f g { \relative c'{ << { r2 r4 \tuplet 3/2 { c8-. f-. c'-.

Re: Nesting levels in the source code - why do I have to use one level more than I thought?

Hi David, That's a very helpful answer, thanks! It's a bit of syntax I've not really understood, and so end up "coding by coincidence". Chris ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

<    1   2