Re: Repeated notes

Well, if not an exception so at least another behavior than the one I described in my first sentence. Try your example with R1 replaced with r1 and you will see what I mean. You may call it anything you want. /Kaj On 2016-06-14 23:07, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 14.06.2016 21:22,

Re: Re: Repeated notes

. It does not write out the time, but this is nevertheless conserved à la Lilypond. /Kaj Den 2016-06-14 19:01, skrev David Kastrup: David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes: Is there a quick way to write repeated notes? I know that I can write \repeat unfold 8 { bf8 } instead of bf8

Re: Repeated notes

David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes: > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:01 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes: >> >> > >> > Is there a quick way to write repeated notes? >> > >>

Re: Repeated notes

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:01 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes: > > > > > Is there a quick way to write repeated notes? > > > > I know that I can write  > > > > \repeat unfold 8 { bf8 } > &

Re: Repeated notes

David Sumbler <da...@aeolia.co.uk> writes: > Is there a quick way to write repeated notes? > > I know that I can write  > > \repeat unfold 8 { bf8 } > > instead of  > > bf8 bf bf bf bf bf bf bf > > > But is there a simpler way?  Perhaps somethin

Repeated notes

Is there a quick way to write repeated notes? I know that I can write  \repeat unfold 8 { bf8 } instead of  bf8 bf bf bf bf bf bf bf But is there a simpler way?  Perhaps something along the lines of  bf8*8 (which, as it stands, doesn't work, of course). David

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

> And let's say I want to add fingering instructions, but only to the > first , as if I had written > > \relative c' { 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 > 8 } > Sorry to answer so late. This snippet can perhaps make your life easier : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=768 But it will not work as you expect if

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

Gilles THIBAULT writes: >> And let's say I want to add fingering instructions, but only to the >> first , as if I had written >> >> \relative c' { 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 >> 8 } >> > > Sorry to answer so late. > This snippet can perhaps make your life easier : >

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

On 2015-11-09 19:40, David Kastrup (and Simon Albrecht) wrote: > Stephan Neuhaus writes: [...] Thanks, both solutions work like a charm! Now another thing, in the same context. Let's say I have pattern = { 8 8 } \relative c' { \repeat unfold 4 \pattern } And let's say I

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

Stephan Neuhaus writes: > Dear list, > > I have a piece that contains phrases that are repeated often. For > example, let us assume that the phrase consists of two sixteenth notes. > In the piece in question, the unit of repetition is in fact much longer; > this is just an

Markup for repeated notes or phrases

Dear list, I have a piece that contains phrases that are repeated often. For example, let us assume that the phrase consists of two sixteenth notes. In the piece in question, the unit of repetition is in fact much longer; this is just an example. So I have done this: phrase = { c16 d16 }

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

Hello Stephan, On 09.11.2015 18:45, Stephan Neuhaus wrote: Dear list, I have a piece that contains phrases that are repeated often. For example, let us assume that the phrase consists of two sixteenth notes. In the piece in question, the unit of repetition is in fact much longer; this is just

Re: Markup for repeated notes or phrases

P.S. Technically, \staccato and similar are not markups (which would create a TextScript grob), but articulations (which create a Script grob) – important, when you want to use an override. On 09.11.2015 18:45, Stephan Neuhaus wrote: Dear list, I have a piece that contains phrases that are

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

-- Forwarded message -- From: guoguocuozuoduo brian777...@hotmail.com Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles To: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com There should be for neo-modern, neo-modern

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes: -- Forwarded message -- From: guoguocuozuoduo brian777...@hotmail.com Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles To: David Nalesnik david.nales

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: So what about { { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } } ? I think you mean { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } Should neo-modern-voice really consider the second fis'8 a repetition of the

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: So what about { { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } } ? I think you mean { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f'

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: Take neo-modern and neo-modern-cautionary out of the mix. My observation holds for neo-modern and dodecaphonic-no-repeat, which both operate at a staff level. *Arghh* I meant neo-modern-voice, of course.

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Accidentals-on-repeated-notes-separated-by-rests-in-certain-styles-tp164462p164485.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above the accidental looks superfluous, but

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

after rests, I realized that they were pretty much always necessary! Take care, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Accidentals-on-repeated-notes-separated-by-rests-in-certain-styles-tp164462p164489.html Sent from the User mailing list archive

Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

Certain accidental styles suppress accidentals on immediately repeated notes. (These styles are neo-modern, neo-modern-cautionary, neo-modern-voice, neo-modern-voice-cautionary, and dodecaphonic-no-repeat.) When a pitch repetition occurs across a rest, however, the accidental is repeated

Re: Define custom/new \accidentalStyles (dodecaphonic minus repeated notes)

that I use. Thanks! -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Define-custom-new-accidentalStyles-dodecaphonic-minus-repeated-notes-tp158770p159105.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Define custom/new \accidentalStyles (dodecaphonic minus repeated notes)

Hi Urs, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Hi, searching the docs and the lilypond-user archive I couldn't find any relevant information. I am looking for a custom \accidentalStyle. Actually I think this is quite commonly used, so it would also seem

Define custom/new \accidentalStyles (dodecaphonic minus repeated notes)

Hi, searching the docs and the lilypond-user archive I couldn't find any relevant information. I am looking for a custom \accidentalStyle. Actually I think this is quite commonly used, so it would also seem like a useful addition to LilyPond proper. a) Every note gets an explicit

Re: midi and repeated notes

Jean-Alexis Montignies ja at montignies.info writes: When presented with a note off and a note on at the same time with the same note number, my sequencer does not repeat the note. I think the sequencer should repeat the note. There is some argument about how to interpret overlapping

midi and repeated notes

Hello, May be it was already addressed on the list. When presented with a note off and a note on at the same time with the same note number, my sequencer does not repeat the note. Wouldn't it be wise at least for repeated note to finish the previous note before the new starts? Any known work