Re: Inline attachments Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-03 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> I do see the attachment, it's just not displayed in the text of the message.  > I'm using GMail and I'm not in Plain Text mode.  I see images inline with > other emails, just not David Kastrup's.  Most people send HTML email, which can contain inline images as HTML code (technically: an tag

Re: Inline attachments Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-03 Thread Knute Snortum
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 8:03 AM David Wright wrote: > The problem must be on your side, unless you're subscribed to the > text-only version of the digest that comes with no attachments. > If your MUA doesn't display the image inline, you should be able > to display or save it just like any normal

Inline attachments Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-03 Thread David Wright
On Sun 03 Dec 2023 at 06:05:31 (-0800), Knute Snortum wrote: > > Ah, yes, I see it now! There is some problem between your email reader to > mine where I don't see inline attachments. So I only saw: > > "gives me > > > and a bar check warning." > > Which I wrongly interpreted as "gives me a

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-03 Thread Knute Snortum
ce notes to be slurred, but if I > >> put "{ cis32( d) }", I get a "Warning: already have slur". > >> > >> Is there a way to get a "slur within a slur"? > >> > > When we ask for a MWE, the "w" stands for "working

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-03 Thread David Kastrup
t; The D following the \afterGrace is slurred up to the C at the beginning of >> the following bar. >> >> I would also like the "{ cis32 d }" grace notes to be slurred, but if I >> put "{ cis32( d) }", I get a "Warning: already have slur". >&

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-02 Thread Knute Snortum
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 7:57 AM Peter Mayes wrote: > On 02/12/2023 15:49, Knute Snortum wrote: > > When we ask for a MWE, the "w" stands for "working". > > My apologies - I'm a relative newbie here! I'll know next time. > > And thanks David and Knute for the pointers. Once I knew what I was >

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-02 Thread Peter Mayes
On 02/12/2023 15:49, Knute Snortum wrote: When we ask for a MWE, the "w" stands for "working". My apologies - I'm a relative newbie here! I'll know next time. And thanks David and Knute for the pointers. Once I knew what I was looking for, I found the relevant section in the documentation.

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-02 Thread Knute Snortum
he C at the beginning of > the following bar. > > I would also like the "{ cis32 d }" grace notes to be slurred, but if I > put "{ cis32( d) }", I get a "Warning: already have slur". > > Is there a way to get a "slur within a slur"? > When we

Re: Slur within a slur?

2023-12-02 Thread David Kastrup
the > following bar. > > I would also like the "{ cis32 d }" grace notes to be slurred, but if I put > "{ cis32( d) }", I > get a "Warning: already have slur". > > Is there a way to get a "slur within a slur"? > > Thanks in advance Wri

Slur within a slur?

2023-12-02 Thread Peter Mayes
race notes to be slurred, but if I put "{ cis32( d) }", I get a "Warning: already have slur". Is there a way to get a "slur within a slur"? Thanks in advance -- Best wishes -- Peter