Hi Ben,
> I read the 2005 article in the Linux journal about making schenkerian graphs,
> and I feel like it covered everything except one type of slur. I think I've
> heard it called a swan slur before. It's a slur that hooks around a note. In
> this picture it's the slur connecting the e
Hello,
I read the 2005 article in the Linux journal about making schenkerian
graphs, and I feel like it covered everything except one type of slur. I
think I've heard it called a swan slur before. It's a slur that hooks
around a note. In this picture it's the slur connecting the e flat in the
bass
Il giorno dom 3 mar 2024 alle ore 18:36 Jean Brefort
ha scritto:
>
> Try this:
> c''1:32( | c1:32 )( | c1:32 )( | c4 ) r4 r2 |
>
> you only need three slurs not four.
Works great, thanks.
Il giorno dom 3 mar 2024 alle ore 18:32 David Kastrup ha scritto:
> You should
Try this:
c''1:32( | c1:32 )( | c1:32 )( | c4 ) r4 r2 |
you only need three slurs not four.
Hope this helps,
Jean Brefort (not the
Le dimanche 03 mars 2024 à 18:20 +0100, Gerardo Ballabio a écrit :
> Hello,
> please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected to
> e
Gerardo Ballabio writes:
> Hello,
> please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected to
> each other? Look at example below to see what I mean (result
> attached).
>
> The following code does what I want but it gives multiple warnings like these:
>
>
Hello,
please what is the correct way to draw multiple slurs connected to
each other? Look at example below to see what I mean (result
attached).
The following code does what I want but it gives multiple warnings like these:
Parsing...
slur.ly:4:3: warning: Unattached SlurEvent
Interpreting
On 1/7/2024 4:11 PM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
\once \override Dots.avoid-slur = #'ignore
(Dots instead of Slur)
Thank you! That’s what I was misunderstanding.
—Joel
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 21:35, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>
> Reposting for clarity as to what I’m asking.
>
> In the second case below, instead of the slur attaching to the specific
note, it moves vertically—I assume, to avoid collision with the duration
dot. (Though it’s interesting that a tie does
Hello Joel
You can shape the Slur manually, like so:
\version "2.25.11"
\fixed c' {
% undotted note: slur attaches correctly
2
|
% dotted note: slur is moved vertically
\shape #'((1 . 0.5) (0.5 . 0.3) (0.5 . 0.3) (0 . 0)) Slur %adjusting
the numbers control the four control points
Reposting for clarity as to what I’m asking.
In the second case below, instead of the slur attaching to the specific
note, it moves vertically—I assume, to avoid collision with the duration
dot. (Though it’s interesting that a tie does not mind overlapping the
dot, as in the fourth case.)
I should have been clearer. The score I’m trying to emulate has slurs—
|4. |
—and it’s the vertical movement of the slurs I’m trying to avoid.
The fact that ties will overlap the note dots was a curiosity I found in
trying to boil that down to a minimal working example.
—Joel
On 1/4/2024
Joel:
Is this better?
\fixed c' {
2
|
2.
4 |
2 q |
2. q4 |
}
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Joel C.
Salomon
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 6:11 PM
To: LilyPond Users
Subject: Slurs within chords
Somewhat surprising result, tested on 2.24 & 2.25.11:
|```
\version "2.24"
\fixed c' {
2
|
2.
4 |
2 q |
2. q4 |
}
```|
In the second instance, the tie attaches to the bottom of the initial
chord, presumably to avoid colliding with the dot. (Interestingly, as in
examples 3 &
Hi Peter,
What can I do to avoid the outer slur colliding with the inner slurs?
Code the inner slurs as Slurs and the *outer* slur as a PhrasingSlur,
rather than the other way around (as you did):
f4\p\( aes8( des16. c32) |
c8.( bes32 aes) g8\) r8 |
As a secondary question, I always
As a beginner at Lilypond, this is the first time I have seen something
that looks a little ugly "out of the box" (unless, of course, I am doing
something wrong!)
What can I do to avoid the outer slur colliding with the inner slurs?
As a secondary question, I always find that
David,
Wow, so simple.
Thank you for the remedy.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2023 2:44 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: slurs
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> Hello All:
>
>
&
"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes:
> Hello All:
>
>
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \relative c'' {
>
> \slurDown 4
>
> (bes16) (a c bes d c ees d)
>
> }
Good example why it is a bad idea to use non-standard input formatting
for aesthetic reasons: you lose a proper idea about what you are
actually
Hello All:
\version "2.22.2"
\relative c'' {
\slurDown 4
(bes16) (a c bes d c ees d)
}
Produces this
What must be done to produce this?
Thank you for your assistance.
Mark
Le jeudi 17 août 2023 à 12:38 -0400, Jin Choi a écrit :
> and also discussion of being able to do it in Frescobaldi under Layout Control
> Mode, which appears to have moved to Tools/Viewers/Layout Control Options but
> now has no option for displaying control points.
The reason it was removed is
It was “Adjusting slurs and ties in LilyPond”, from this group’s archives:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-10/pdfn4OnsjHZAm.pdf
Some of the features look very handy to describe control points as polar
coordinates, but I don’t want to drop in a whole mass of code just
> Le 16 août 2023 à 18:52, Jin Choi a écrit :
>
> I came across a PDF describing updates to \shape that let you use head
> centered coordinates and polar coordinates that would make this easier. But
> my 2.24.0 version of lilypond doesn’t seem to include \shapeII. What is the
> status of
is the status of
that?
On Aug 16, 2023, at 5:33 AM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Jin,
Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
It's possible, but it's not fun.
\version "2.24.0"
\new PianoStaff
<<
\n
ser wrote:
>
> Hi Jin,
>
> Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
>> Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
>
> It's possible, but it's not fun.
>
> \version "2.24.0"
>
> \new PianoStaff
> <<
> \new Staff
Hi Jin,
Am 16.08.23 um 04:48 schrieb Jin Choi:
Is it possible to get this style of s-curve shaped slurs across staves?
It's possible, but it's not fun.
\version "2.24.0"
\new PianoStaff
<<
\new Staff = upper {
<<
{
r8
\shape #'((0 . 0) (4 . -2)
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM Jin Choi wrote:
> I see that it’s possible to place textual marks inside of slurs:
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/expressive-marks_003a-positioning-text-markups-inside-slurs
> Is it possible to get crescendo and decrescendo mar
Hi,
you could set the outside-staff-priority of the Slur:
\version "2.24.1"
top = { \change Staff = "upper" \voiceTwo }
bottom = { \change Staff = "lower" \voiceOne }
upper = \relative c' {
\key g \minor
\voiceOne
d'4.^\markup {\italic "espressivo"}^"a tempo"\p^- c8\tweak outside-staff-
I see that it’s possible to place textual marks inside of slurs:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/expressive-marks_003a-positioning-text-markups-inside-slurs
Is it possible to get crescendo and decrescendo marks within slurs as well?
\version "2.24.1"
top = { \ch
>> Suprisingly, no – at least I couldn't find an entry. I've now created
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6631
>
> And there is now https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2043
>
> See, if you report problems, there is a chance they actually get
> fixed :-)
Le vendredi 16 juin 2023 à 20:21 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> Suprisingly, no – at least I couldn't find an entry. I've now created
>
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6631
And there is now https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2043
See, if you report
> Cough, cough. I have found this to work:
>
> ```
> \version "2.25.5"
>
> #(set-default-paper-size "a6")
>
> {
> d'4 e' g' d' |
> d'4 e' g' d'( ~ |
> \once \override Staff.KeySignature.break-visibility = #all-invisible
> \break
> d'4) e' f' d' |
> d'4 e' f' d' |
> }
> ```
Very
Le vendredi 16 juin 2023 à 05:37 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> In my opinion, the worst flaw of LilyPond's otherwise excellent
> formatting, a flaw that essentially everyone encounters rather
> quickly, is that broken slurs are almost always shorter than broken
> ties (it shoul
In my opinion, the worst flaw of LilyPond's otherwise excellent
formatting, a flaw that essentially everyone encounters rather
quickly, is that broken slurs are almost always shorter than broken
ties (it should be exactly the opposite), which is butt ugly and
sometimes really hampers readability
Yes, Gould does say to always place a slur outside a beam. And I’m fine with
that being Lilypond’s default behavior. But I’d love the ability to tell
Lilypond to place slurs inside of beams (when possible).
I do have one hymnal that prints slurs inside beams. I suspect that this
choice
At 11:47 13/02/2023 -0800, Aaron Hill wrote:
I am quite used to LilyPond's default handling of slurs with them
positioned next to the beam, but should I be following the source
engraving with the slurs sit inside so they are closer to the note
heads? Does Gould offer advice on this?
To your
Attached is an image showing an excerpt from a reference score as well
as output from LilyPond.
I am quite used to LilyPond's default handling of slurs with them
positioned next to the beam, but should I be following the source
engraving with the slurs sit inside so they are closer
Hi Jon,
Am 22.01.23 um 03:31 schrieb Jon Arnold:
Thanks all! Separating the voices did fix the problem. I used this
score a long time ago and then updated the layout, so I feel like an
update several years ago must have changed the behavior, which is
interesting.
Compare:
\version "2.24"
11:59:06 (+1100), Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold,
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey folks-
> > >
> > > Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> > > part of the attached file? It first occ
On Sun 22 Jan 2023 at 11:59:06 (+1100), Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold, wrote:
>
> > Hey folks-
> >
> > Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> > part of the attached file? It first occurs in
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:32 Jon Arnold, wrote:
> Hey folks-
>
> Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
> part of the attached file? It first occurs in the 2nd half of bar 7, bottom
> of page 3. It seems to be related to the barLiner function I have
the
problem?
-Will
On 1/21/23 18:31, Jon Arnold wrote:
Hey folks-
Can anyone tell me why the slurs are not being followed in the soprano
part of the attached file? It first occurs in the 2nd half of bar 7,
bottom of page 3. It seems to be related to the barLiner function I have
(it goes away
g8 g') c,,8 c'8)
}
}
>>
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\remove "Slur_engraver"
\remove "Slur_performer"
}
\context {
\Staff
\consists "Slur_engraver"
\consists "Slur_performer"
}
}
}
O
context {
\Voice
\remove "Slur_engraver"
\remove "Slur_performer"
}
\context {
\Staff
\consists "Slur_engraver"
\consists "Slur_performer"
}
}
}
On 7/27/22 11:28, Jim Cline wrote:
I would like to create slurs between al
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 8:29 AM Jim Cline wrote:
>
> I would like to create slurs between alternating notes across two voices
> in this example:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> lower =
>\relative c {
> \time 3/4
>\clef bass
><<{\stemUp
I would like to create slurs between alternating notes across two voices
in this example:
\version "2.20.0"
lower =
\relative c {
\time 3/4
\clef bass
<<{\stemUp e''16\rest cis4 bis ais8~ais16}\\{\clef treble\stemDown
\slurDown e4 dis cis}>>|
}
\score {
Hi Kevin,
On 02/06/2022 22:56, Kevin Cole wrote:
The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs
coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following
measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I
miss?
without context it’s hard to tell
Thanks for the suggestions.
I'm working from a 3-ring binder of songs collected via photocopying
and hand-transcription that a group of us used to sing and play from
30 years ago. I have no idea who scrawled this tune in. But, seeing as
how most (if not all) of us were amateurs, it is very
starting note has these
piled up after it like so: fs4~(\( . But the result is clashing slurs, so
you'll need to use the \shape tweak to adjust the position of at least one of
them.
But to me this seems a very odd way to write this...
Paul
From: Kevin Cole
To: lilypond-user mailinglist
Hi,
The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs
coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following
measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I
miss?
\version "2.22.1"
\language "english"
\new S
Hi Stefan, hi Lukas,
I think it might be reasonable to directly annotate the Slurs instead. This
allows for nice placement, see the appended example.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Montag, 30. Mai 2022, 08:17:58 CEST schrieb Stefan E. Mueller:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> yes, that is what I need, I can tak
Hi Lukas,
yes, that is what I need, I can take it from there - many thanks for the
quick response and solution, and the explanations!
Stefan
--
Stefan E. Mueller
stefan.e.muel...@gmx.de
On Sun, 29 May 2022, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Am 29.05.22 um 22:42 schrieb Stefan
Hi Stefan,
Am 29.05.22 um 22:42 schrieb Stefan E. Mueller:
I am not sure yet what the difference between a scheme-function and a
music-function is (the second example seems to work whichever definition
is chosen).
A music function must return music, a scheme function can return more
general
g music)
((number? -1.5) ly:music?)
#{
<>-^(^\markup {\halign #spacing ho}
#music
#})
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho #-2.5 f''8 a'')
}
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho f''8 a'')
}
Here, I have used the "empty chord trick": <> is an empty chord that doesn't
ta
#})
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho #-2.5 f''8 a'')
}
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho f''8 a'')
}
Here, I have used the "empty chord trick": <> is an empty chord that
doesn't take up time; any slurs and articulations attached to this chord
will be attached to the first bit of music coming afte
When notating guitar music, I use a slur with a markup to indicate
hammer-ons, pull-offs, slides or bendings, like in this example:
\new Staff {
e''8^(^\markup {\halign #-1.5 ho} f''8)
}
I'd like to define a scheme function for the slur and markup, such that I
can write
\new Staff {
e''8 \ho
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 18:39, Trinton a écrit :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
> been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
> [48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): # T
Hi folks,
Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
[48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #
I've not been able to find any hints about this message in the docs. What's
especially
\afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
Richard
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 09:13 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have
> a symbol attached to the note (which I should have
Sorry for the hour!
It's a matter of parenthesis order and spaces:
\relative c' {
\afterGrace g4-+( { a16 g16) }
}
This works for me
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 10:13 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 10:00 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur
> inside
> the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
well I got there because it said the error was in column 30, i.e. the
closing ) and I suspected that those
Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur inside
the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
Again, thanks.
Alasdair
On Sunday 06 February 2022 20:53:12 (+11:00), Richard Shann wrote:
>
>
> \afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
>
> Richard
>
> On Sun, 2022-02-06 at
Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early evening).
I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have a symbol
attached to the note (which I should have included in my example):
\afterGrace g4-+( {a16 g16} )
I've tried moving the beginning of the slur to
Good morning,
try:
\afterGrace g4( { a16 g16) }
The slur event must be attached directly after the note.
Rip_mus
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 08:59 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> This works:
> g4( \grace {a16 g16})
>
> making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
> right
This works:
g4( \grace {a16 g16})
making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
right spacing and barring (I need grace notes to occur before the bar line,
rather than after), I need to use "afterGrace":
\afterGrace g4 {a16 g16}
However, if I attempt to include a
Hello,
Suppose that I have a slur that must be placed ABOVE a note which is part
of a a TupletBracket and an OttavaBracket .
As the documentation explains, TupletBrackets and OttavaBrackets need to
have the outside-staff-priority property set to false in order to be
printed inside slurs
Hi all,
On Nov 30, 2021, at 2:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> there may be the desire to eventually match labelled
> slurs at more than Voice-level while retaining Voice-level slurs
> locally. However, I have no idea what kind of form this sort of feature
> could take exa
Timothy Lanfear writes:
> When slurs overlap, I noticed that I could omit one of the slur
> labels. Can I count on this behaviour or did I just get lucky?
You can count on it. In a manner of speaking, "unlabelled" is a label
of its own. With regard to whether you can count on
When slurs overlap, I noticed that I could omit one of the slur labels.
Can I count on this behaviour or did I just get lucky? Taking the
example from the NR 1.3.2:
\version "2.22.0"
\fixed c' {
2
2
}
--
Timothy Lanfear, Bristol, UK.
Dear Valentin,
Most excellent thank you very much for this!
Adam
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:57 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> hide overrides the specified grobs to be transparent (they will still
> affect
> spacing!)
> One option would be doing something like the appended example,
Hi Adam,
hide overrides the specified grobs to be transparent (they will still affect
spacing!)
One option would be doing something like the appended example, which overrides
appoggiatura to tweak the slur to that transparent is #f.
A better way would be the use \omit Slur, which sets
Hi Everyone,
Could someone help me please. Using...
\hide Slur
...I would like to cancel my slur markings yet retain the small slur in my
acciaccatura. On a bit of a deadline and would appreciate any help!
Thank you in advance.
Adam
%%%
\relative c' {
c8 (d e f) g (a b c)
\acciaccatura d8
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 1:52 PM Jefferson Felix wrote:
> it's not generating doubleSlurs, but when I remove the pair of numbers
> after \partCombine, doubleSlurs works.
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
I also live in a music tradition with joined-notes hymnals. I use
\partcombine #'(2 . 9)
In
> Le 03/07/2021 09:53, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Brent,
>
> Am 03.07.21 um 09:40 schrieb Brent Annable:
> > Hi everybody,
> > I'm preparing some choral motets, and so far I have used slurs to tell
> > the lyric engine where to put the melismata
Lukas,
Perfect, thanks so much again! Gee I'm learning a lot right now.
Brent.
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 at 17:53, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
> Hi Brent,
>
> Am 03.07.21 um 09:40 schrieb Brent Annable:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm preparing some choral motets, and so fa
Hi Brent,
Am 03.07.21 um 09:40 schrieb Brent Annable:
Hi everybody,
I'm preparing some choral motets, and so far I have used slurs to tell
the lyric engine where to put the melismata. I am finding the page a
little too cluttered, so bow I want to see what the score would look
like without
Hi everybody,
I'm preparing some choral motets, and so far I have used slurs to tell the
lyric engine where to put the melismata. I am finding the page a little too
cluttered, so bow I want to see what the score would look like without the
slurs in it.
When I use \hide Slur, they disappear
Of course this relies on the "standard" broken slurs being symmetrical.
... and it ignores LilyPond's habit of thickening a slur in the middle
(the thickest part should be the cutoff point now).
d-span))
(offset (- (car x-extent) (* factor (car (first bezier))
(map (affine-x-transform factor offset) bezier)))
#(define (horizontalise-broken-slurs grob)
(let*
((orig (ly:grob-original grob))
(siblings (if (ly:grob? orig)
(ly:spanner-broken-into orig)
ot;
Michael
On Apr 26 2021, at 4:54 am, Lukas-Fabian Moserwrote:
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>
>
>
> Am 26.04.21 um 05:36 schrieb Michael Blankenship:
>
>
> >
> > Is there a way to make all broken slurs look lik
Hi Michael,
Am 26.04.21 um 05:36 schrieb Michael Blankenship:
Is there a way to make all broken slurs look like they were a single
slur that was broken at its apex? So the first half would terminate at
horizontal, and the second half would begin at horizontal. That way
they would really
Hey Gang,
Is there a way to make all broken slurs look like they were a single slur that
was broken at its apex? So the first half would terminate at horizontal, and
the second half would begin at horizontal. That way they would really look like
continuous entities, instead
Hello Jacques,
Yes, this is possible. It’s just that Lilypond thinks that a slur of that
shape would not look good in that place. You can change the scoring parameters
Lilypond uses for determining how ugly a slur looks.
For example you can increase Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor to
ps://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=134>, second attached image?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> JM
>
> Hi Jacques,
>
> LilyPond does support cross-staff slurs. In your example, it thinks the slur
> is going to look ugly if crossing the staves, and ch
without setting
control points manually, as is shown in
https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=134
<https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=134>, second attached image?
Thanks for your help!
JM
Hi Jacques,
LilyPond does support cross-staff slurs. In your example, it thinks the
slur is
Hello folks,
MusicXML has the concept of a slur to a note in another staff, and MusicScore
provides this feature.
The simple attempt, first attached image, doesn’t produce a satisfactory result.
Is there a way to obtain such a slur in LilyPond without setting control points
manually, as is
Hello Gabriel,
You need to be mindful of this: In Lilypond a tie or a slur has to remain in
the Voice it started in. Now, the problem ist that
<< A \\ B >>
does in fact create two new Voices. Thus you cannot really tie to it from the
outside. The thing you want to do is to continue the voice
-- Forwarded message -
De: Gabriel Borin
Date: qua., 31 de mar. de 2021 às 23:15
Subject: Re: Slurs and multiple voice writing in piano music
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
I guess I solved it!! Tks, Marc
The code became (for the excerpt)
\version "2.22.0"
<<{d4.
Borin
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 6:59 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Slurs and multiple voice writing in piano music
Hello,
I have been trying Lilypond for a week now. For practice, I am trying to copy a
few piano pieces I am familiar with. In one of them, Chopin´s Prelude n.2, I
Hello,
I have been trying Lilypond for a week now. For practice, I am trying to
copy a few piano pieces I am familiar with. In one of them, Chopin´s
Prelude n.2, I have been struggling to produce the output below (last four
bars of the prelude).
I couldn't manage to tie the A across the bars,
On 2021-03-23 6:41 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I suggest using the shape functions in the OpenLilyLib library.
Or it sounds like a laissez vibrer slur maybe. You can use the
\extendLV function that is somewhere on LSR. If not, I can post it.
That's LSR 715 [1] in particular.
[1]:
I suggest using the shape functions in the OpenLilyLib library.
Or it sounds like a laissez vibrer slur maybe. You can use the \extendLV
function that is somewhere on LSR. If not, I can post it.
[Sorry, I am in a rush...]
Andrew
Vaylor Trucks wrote on 24/03/2021 11:51 AM:
I really need
I really need to find a way to drop in an unterminated custom length slur
that extends past a barline.
I cannot use a hidden note to terminate the slur. The piece in question has
a bar followed by 2 percent repeat bars. If I use the hidden note, Lilypond
places it in the first of the 2 percent
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Silvain,
>
> In fact the aforementioned
>
> \override Script.avoid-slur = #' inside
>
> is the proper way to do this.
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
Perfect! Thanks Valentin.
Be well,
Ralph
--
Ralph Palmer
Brattleboro, VT
USA
(he, him,
function of slurs.
Cheers,
Valentin
--
Silvain Dupertuis
Route de Lausanne 335
1293 Bellevue (Switzerland)
tél. +41-(0)22-774.20.67
portable +41-(0)79-604.87.52
web: silvain-dupertuis.org <http://perso.silvain-dupertuis.org>
you actually want,
which will change the essential scoring function of slurs.
Cheers,
Valentin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
!
I'm trying to force portato marks inside slurs. I've attached a MWE. I've tried
searching both the regular LilyPond documentation and the LSR, with no luck. Can someone
please point me in the right direction, either in the documentation, the LSR, or with code?
Be well,
Ralph
--
Ralph Palmer
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:56 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> \override Script.avoid-slur = #'inside
> d4-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
> }
>
Thanks, Jean -
I could remember dealing with the problem somehow in the past, but could
not remember or find the solution.
All the best,
Ralph
--
Ralph Palmer
Le 07/03/2021 à 14:51, Ralph Palmer a écrit :
Greetings -
Thanks for all your work and help!
I'm trying to force portato marks inside slurs. I've attached a MWE.
I've tried searching both the regular LilyPond documentation and the
LSR, with no luck. Can someone please point me in the right
Greetings -
Thanks for all your work and help!
I'm trying to force portato marks inside slurs. I've attached a MWE. I've
tried searching both the regular LilyPond documentation and the LSR, with
no luck. Can someone please point me in the right direction, either in the
documentation, the LSR
Hello,
I did an exercise for myself (invented!)
Using lyrics, piano + voice.
Lyrics do align correctly.
In this one, I separate things using variables.
It make things easier to edit and expand.
Hope it can help.
(Sorry if it is partly in French, my language...)
Le 25.02.21 à 00:29, John Helly a
hel...@ucsd.edu"
*Subject: *Re: Aligning lyric syllables to notes within beams and slurs?
Thank you, Carl. I will eagerly read it.
I did send these screensnaps for exactly the reason you point out.
Did they not come through?
Screensnaps don’t help very much. We need lilypond code that we
1 - 100 of 1288 matches
Mail list logo
