Re: \mark and slur

Am 14.09.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: c4 c c d (c4) c c c […] c4 c c d \mark "X" (c4) c c c The start of slur belongs to the d, not the c. Writing d (c) is possible and equivalent to d( c) but the latter more clearly says what’s going on. You tried

Re: \mark and slur

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 14.09.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: >>c4 c c d >>(c4) c c c > > […] > >>c4 c c d >>\mark "X" (c4) c c c > > The start of slur belongs to the d, not the c. > > Writing > d (c) > is possible and equivalent to > d(

Re: \mark and slur

Thank you Malte and Phil! It works well and your suggestion make sense. I normally didn't pay much attention to this thing, now I will. Gianmaria On 14 September 2017 at 11:27, Malte Meyn wrote: > > > Am 14.09.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >>c4 c c d >>

frescobaldi print

Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not able to find a solution online. Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from Frescobaldi? Thank you, g. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: \mark and slur

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 14.09.2017 um 11:43 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Incidentally, current master delivers the following verbiage: >> >> GNU LilyPond 2.21.0 >> Processing `sll.ly' >> Parsing... >> sll.ly:4:13: warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event >>\mark

\mark and slur

This compiles well \version "2.19.65" \fixed c' { c4 c c d (c4) c c c } but when I add a \mark like this \version "2.19.65" \fixed c' { c4 c c d \mark "X" (c4) c c c } it doesn't. I know the problem is related to the slur and I can move the mark before d but why I should not be able

Re: How near is 2.20? [was: Re: \mark and slur]

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 14.09.2017 um 11:43 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Incidentally, current master delivers the following verbiage: >> >> GNU LilyPond 2.21.0 > > […] > >> Is that more helpful than previously? >> >> GNU LilyPond 2.19.80 > > This looks nice :) Do I

Re: \mark and slur

It's not the position of the mark that is wrong - it's the slur. This applies to a note and so must follow the note immediately. Move the ( to the end of the previous line and all will be well. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Gianmaria Lari To: lilypond-user

Re: \mark and slur

But isn't the start time of this <> the start time of the c4 in the second line, so that <>( c4) is equivalent to c4(); which causes the warnings 'cannot end slur' for ')' and 'unterminated slur' for '('? My guess is that this insertion of <> makes things more complicated for us, unenlightened

Re: \mark and slur

Am 14.09.2017 um 11:43 schrieb David Kastrup: Incidentally, current master delivers the following verbiage: GNU LilyPond 2.21.0 Processing `sll.ly' Parsing... sll.ly:4:13: warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event \mark "X" (c4) c c c Interpreting music... sll.ly:4:16:

How near is 2.20? [was: Re: \mark and slur]

Am 14.09.2017 um 11:43 schrieb David Kastrup: Incidentally, current master delivers the following verbiage: GNU LilyPond 2.21.0 […] Is that more helpful than previously? GNU LilyPond 2.19.80 This looks nice :) Do I understand correctly that after 2.19.65 follows 2.21.0 in the master

Re: Neapolitan chords & al.

One more point: there’s also ‘pedal’ in MusicXML: C pedal Is that just equivalent to having a usual pedal? JM > Le 13 sept. 2017 à 11:09, Menu Jacques a écrit : > > Hello Mike, > > Excellent, thanks! > > JM > >> Le 13

Re: \mark and slur

David Kastrup wrote: > People tend to ignore warnings > anyway. I personally ignore warnings only when I don't see them. And I normally don't see them when they are in a long list of other information (maybe written in small character etc. etc :)) Ciao, g.

Re: \mark and slur

Rutger Hofman writes: > But isn't the start time of this <> the start time of the c4 in the > second line, so that <>( c4) is equivalent to c4(); which causes the > warnings 'cannot end slur' for ')' and 'unterminated slur' for '('? Yes and yes. > My guess is that this

Re: \mark and slur

Rutger Hofman writes: > On 14-09-17 15:57, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Note: another component that may possibly be included in the warning >> message for this input would be "SlurEvent". Would >> >> sll.ly:4:13: warning: Adding <> for attaching loose SlurEvent >>

Re: \mark and slur

On 14-09-17 15:57, David Kastrup wrote: David Kastrup writes: Rutger Hofman writes: My preference would be to clearly explain that '(' is an attribute of the note that directly precedes it. That's what the "loose post-event" bit is supposed to be about.

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

This *does not* solve the issue--this is identical to what I attached to my previous email with the exception that you dropped the flat sign markup from the third chord (it should be Bbmaj7 with a real flat sign in it, not Bmaj7). Also, it does not solve the issue with the texts above the

Re: frescobaldi print

Am 14.09.2017 um 12:49 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: Sorry to ask this that probably is a very trivial question, but I have not able to find a solution online. Is there any way to print the pdf file generated by lilypond directly from Frescobaldi? File → Print music … or Ctrl+P as in most

Re: Acciaccatura at the beginning

"Marco B." writes: > Hi to everybody, > I'm a new user trying to learn this wonderful program. > I'm making a transcription that starts with an acciaccatura and noticed it > messes up everything in the other staves. > I know it's a known problem Issue 34 > but I need to

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

Shamus Hammons wrote: > > In the example I included, you can see that the text for the > > Bbmaj7 chord is rendered in pieces, and the chord names are generally > > farther above the diagrams than they should be. You are using \center-column to get these two things arranged vertically. It

Acciaccatura at the beginning

Hi to everybody, I'm a new user trying to learn this wonderful program. I'm making a transcription that starts with an acciaccatura and noticed it messes up everything in the other staves. I know it's a known problem but I need to find a solution. Can someone help? This is an example: \language

The proper way to change time signature in the middle of a bar?

I've got a piece of music where I'm doing the following .. \time 2/4 c2 | c4. \time 6/8 \partial 8 c8 | c2. This gives me the warning voiceStaff.ily:38:2: warning: trying to use \partial after the start of a piece but it works fine. Without the \partial, though, lilypond gets confused over the

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

This gets closer, but the flat sign is sitting all by itself, as if it were a separate word and not part of the chord symbol (like so: "B b maj7"). Also, doesn't address the issue of the chord names floating too high above the diagrams. On 09/14/2017 11:26 AM, Robin Bannister wrote: > Shamus

RE: Acciaccatura at the beginning

Marco, To make the staves line up, place a “dummy” acciaccatura, in the “other” voice. It would be \acciaccatura s32. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marco B. Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 9:57 AM To:

Re: \mark and slur

David Kastrup writes: > Rutger Hofman writes: > >> My preference would be to clearly explain that '(' is an attribute of >> the note that directly precedes it. > > That's what the "loose post-event" bit is supposed to be about. > GNU LilyPond 2.21.0

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

Hello Shamus, Using: subtitle = \markup { \override #'(font-family . sans) { \center-column { C9 \fret-diagram-terse #"x;3;2;3;3;x;" } " " \center-column { "B7#9" \fret-diagram-terse #"x;2;1;2;3;x;" } " "

Re: Acciaccatura at the beginning

Thank you David, I've found it Marco Il giorno gio 14 set 2017 alle ore 19:06 David Kastrup ha scritto: > "Marco B." writes: > > > Hi to everybody, > > I'm a new user trying to learn this wonderful program. > > I'm making a transcription that starts with an

Re: \mark and slur

Noeck writes: > Hi, > >> Note or chord or rest or skip or bass figure or cluster note or lyrics >> or multimeasure rest. Something like that. > > :) > >> Slur or phrasing slur or absolute dynamic or annote output or arpeggio >> or articulation or beam or beam forbid or

Re: \mark and slur

Hi, > Note or chord or rest or skip or bass figure or cluster note or lyrics > or multimeasure rest. Something like that. :) > Slur or phrasing slur or absolute dynamic or annote output or arpeggio > or articulation or beam or beam forbid or bendafter or crescendo or > decrescendo or episema

Re: \mark and slur

"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: > David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: \mark and slur >> >> "Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: >> >>> Try >>> >>> c4 c c d >>> >>>(c4^\markup {"X"}) c c c >> >> Shrug. If

Re: The proper way to change time signature in the middle of a bar?

Wols Lists writes: > I've got a piece of music where I'm doing the following .. > > \time 2/4 c2 | c4. > \time 6/8 \partial 8 c8 | c2. > > This gives me the warning > > voiceStaff.ily:38:2: warning: trying to use \partial after the start of > a piece > > but it works

Re: The proper way to change time signature in the middle of a bar?

On 14/09/17 18:30, David Kastrup wrote: > Wols Lists writes: > >> I've got a piece of music where I'm doing the following .. >> >> \time 2/4 c2 | c4. >> \time 6/8 \partial 8 c8 | c2. >> >> This gives me the warning >> >> voiceStaff.ily:38:2: warning: trying to use

Re: \mark and slur

"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: > Try > > c4 c c d > >(c4^\markup {"X"}) c c c Shrug. If you insist on that kind of organization you can try \version "2.19.65" \fixed c' { c4 c c d (\mark "X" c4) c c c } But it's really a delusion you are getting and

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

Shamus Hammons wrote: This gets closer, but the flat sign is sitting all by itself, as if it were a separate word and not part of the chord symbol (like so: "B b maj7"). OK, sorry. Instead of \line use \concat: \concat { "B" \chordFlat "maj7" } Also, doesn't address the issue of the chord

RE: \mark and slur

Gianmaria, Try c4 c c d (c4^\markup {"X"}) c c c Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Gianmaria Lari Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:14 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: \mark and slur This

Re: \mark and slur

Hi, > warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event I would understand it best if the warning said any of: Cannot attach slur to preceding expression Slur is not attached to note or chord Cannot attach slur to note or chord No note or chord before this slur to attach it to (is that

Re: Help with chord dictionaries

That works perfectly. Thank you! On 09/14/2017 12:18 PM, Robin Bannister wrote: > Shamus Hammons wrote: > >> This gets closer, but the flat sign is sitting all by itself, as if it >> were a separate word and not part of the chord symbol (like so: "B b >> maj7"). > > OK, sorry. Instead of \line

Re: \mark and slur

Noeck writes: > Hi, > >> warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event > > I would understand it best if the warning said any of: > > Cannot attach slur to preceding expression > Slur is not attached to note or chord > Cannot attach slur to note or chord > No note or

RE: \mark and slur

David, What I presented was a suggestion that "worked." In no way, shape, or form was it an "insistence." With sincere respect for your work, Mark -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 12:10 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek

Re: \mark and slur

Hi David, I know played a little with your fix issue 5181 On current topic: 2017-09-14 15:57 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > David Kastrup writes: > Note: another component that may possibly be included in the warning > message for this input would be "SlurEvent".

RE: \mark and slur

David, Understood. Thank you. Mark -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:52 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: 'Gianmaria Lari' ; 'lilypond-user' Subject: Re:

Re: \mark and slur

2017-09-15 0:25 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> I'd go for post-event(s) >> Plural, because there may be more than one. See example below > > But every one gets its own warning, so each warning is only for one. Well, then I'd expect

Re: \mark and slur

> From: Noeck > Hi, > > > warning: Adding <> for attaching loose post-event > > I would understand it best if the warning said any of: > > Cannot attach slur to preceding expression > Slur is not attached to note or chord > Cannot attach slur to note or chord > No note or

Re: \mark and slur

Thomas Morley writes: > I'd go for post-event(s) > Plural, because there may be more than one. See example below But every one gets its own warning, so each warning is only for one. > But > { -\3 -\rightHandFinger #2 d'4 } > issues the warning, the image doesn't

Re: \mark and slur

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-09-15 0:25 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> I'd go for post-event(s) >>> Plural, because there may be more than one. See example below >> >> But every one gets its own