Blöchl Bernhard writes:
> Lilypond is a nice program but does not use its
> intelligence perfectly for the good of the user.
Tit for tat.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 2/5/2018 3:07 AM, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
This code is generated automaticly, nice isn't it?
Some parts of that code read as if it had been "minified." The harder it
is for humans to read, the harder it is for them to provide good help
with it.
I've turned out my share of less-readable
Am 05.02.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
Am 04.02.2018 23:56, schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 04.02.2018 14:19, bb wrote:
It is not really endless but the tab does not have any line break.
If I try to insert \break this will be ignored? There must be
something wrong with my code I cannot
Peter,
You are welcome very much!
Mark
From: Peter Toye [mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2018 1:10 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Placement of clefs at repeat bars
Mark,
I see what you mean! That works
Am 05.02.2018 um 14:02 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 05.02.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
Am 04.02.2018 23:56, schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 04.02.2018 14:19, bb wrote:
It is not really endless but the tab does not have any line break.
If I try to insert \break this will be ignored? There
Mark,
I see what you mean! That works fine. Thanks very much.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Sunday, February 4, 2018, 7:35:21 PM, you wrote:
Peter,
As I said in my suggestion, using the same “\once” command for the treble clef
Am 04.02.2018 23:56, schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 04.02.2018 14:19, bb wrote:
It is not really endless but the tab does not have any line break. If
I try to insert \break this will be ignored? There must be something
wrong with my code I cannot figure out?
Thanks for help
\version "2.19.80"
Case 1: I set an arbitrary bar (the manual calls it "bar check")
Because it is a *check*, not a bar line!
You insert bars by \bar "|" or \bar "|." or whatever, no by the bar
*check* symbol alone, that's quite a difference.
Just my 2 ct,
Marc
Hi bb,
Do you simply want 17/16? I use times like this very often. Just use \time
17/16 and you will get barlines.
But I think you are algorithmically generating the notes and durations, in
which case, why can't you also generate the /time commands for each section
where you want a particular
David and Harm, I'm really impressed by the level of expertise you both
have showed in this thread. The function works wonderfully, and I'm really
grateful for your help!
I feel kind of bad for asking, but I'm stuck after trying to do what I
thought would be a minor tweak. I wanted to make it so
On 2/5/2018 8:58 AM, bb wrote:
As I have remarked, that the original long string was the output of a
completestest written of a program for a program (therefore the "endless
string") of an experimental program, not meant for any publication.
Interesting! Please describe what what the program
Hi Stefano,
I face this sort of thing all the time in the new complexity scores that I
set. Despite the elegance you seek - and I fully understand the vertical
end point alignment you are wanting - sometimes it is easiest just to roll
over and draw the lines as a path, perhaps using Postscript,
> I wanted to make it so that the two lines that form the hairpin
> would end in the same vertical line,
Please show a real-world example for that. I can't remember having
ever seen this...
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo