Am 08.03.2018 um 02:01 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 08.03.2018 01:39, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote:
So I asked
around[1] and apparently it's a "harmonic delay" or a prolongation...
There is no reason whatsoever for any fancy words. It’s just a dotted
note with the dot written at the rhythmi
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> Rules that have evolved in the course of the 19th and 20th century and are
> certainly alien to the 18th.
I understand that the rules had changed over time and that back then
it was fine to do it that way.
> If you’re trying to turn this in
On 08.03.2018 02:17, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote:
it's written in a way that would break the "normal" rules about
how to use it (it wouldn't fit on the previous bar so a tie to a 8th
note starting the bar is what I would have written)
Rules that have evolved in the course of the 19th and 20t
Edmundo,
You've encountered an earlier engraving convention for how to show pitches
that continue from a previous measure. If you look at more autograph and
earlier published scores from the 17th and 18th centuries you'll find this.
It is, essentially, what we today call a "tied" note. I'm sure yo
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> There is no reason whatsoever for any fancy words. It’s just a dotted note
> with the dot written at the rhythmic position where it actually happens.
> I’ve never seen any realisation of this in LilyPond – would be good to have
> an LSR snipp
On 08.03.2018 01:39, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote:
So I asked
around[1] and apparently it's a "harmonic delay" or a prolongation...
There is no reason whatsoever for any fancy words. It’s just a dotted
note with the dot written at the rhythmic position where it actually
happens.
I’ve never
