On 5/27/20, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
> I am replying here in the middle of the thread, because I decided to
> opt for an open source license after reading the considerations in
> this email. The source is available here:
> https://github.com/fpetrogalli/trr
Hi Francesco,
That’s excellent news!
I am replying here in the middle of the thread, because I decided to
opt for an open source license after reading the considerations in
this email. The source is available here:
https://github.com/fpetrogalli/trr
Thank you Valentin for "opening the can of worms". It's been very informative.
I hav
On 24/05/20 14:18, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 5/24/20, David Kastrup wrote:
>> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
>
> Guys, stop bickering and veering off-topic. The original purpose of
> this thread was to help Francesco gain some insight into the copyri
On 5/24/20, David Kastrup wrote:
> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
Guys, stop bickering and veering off-topic. The original purpose of
this thread was to help Francesco gain some insight into the copyright
modalities and possible publishing choices; arguin
On 24/05/20 12:52, David Kastrup wrote:
> antlists writes:
>
>> So you don't understand the difference between the story, and the book?
>
> You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
> That does not make a backdrop for a discussion but monologueing. I am
> not inter
antlists writes:
> So you don't understand the difference between the story, and the book?
You are working from the premise that everybody except you is an idiot.
That does not make a backdrop for a discussion but monologueing. I am
not interested in that.
--
David Kastrup
On 24/05/2020 11:59, David Kastrup wrote:
Wols Lists writes:
On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the GNU
GPL:
"When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are de
Wols Lists writes:
> On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the
>> GNU GPL:
>>
>> "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
>> price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that
>> y
On 24/05/20 01:08, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Actually, GNU allows charging for the software. From the Preamble to the GNU
> GPL:
>
> "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our
> General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom
> to dist
On 5/23/20, 2:46 PM, "antlists" wrote:
On 22/05/2020 13:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> IIUC, CC licences aim to protect against others making money from
>> your work. How is "ASCAP not being happy" related to that?
>>
> >Unless I'm mistaken, LilyPond (GNU) and CC belong to the "eco-system"
>
antlists writes:
> On 22/05/2020 13:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> IIUC, CC licences aim to protect against others making money from
>> your work. How is "ASCAP not being happy" related to that?
>>
>
>> Unless I'm mistaken, LilyPond (GNU) and CC belong to the "eco-system"
>> where sharing is the
Le sam. 23 mai 2020 à 22:46, antlists a écrit :
>
> On 22/05/2020 13:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > IIUC, CC licences aim to protect against others making money from
> > your work. How is "ASCAP not being happy" related to that?
> >
>
> > Unless I'm mistaken, LilyPond (GNU) and CC belong to the "
You know, the human race managed this pretty successfully for a few hundred
years before computers... seems like this might be overthinking it.
> On May 23, 2020, at 6:30 PM, David Wright wrote:
>
> On Sat 23 May 2020 at 23:35:10 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
On 23 May 2020, at 23:00, antlis
On Sat 23 May 2020 at 23:35:10 (+0200), Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 23 May 2020, at 23:00, antlists wrote:
> > On 23/05/2020 20:21, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> >> I’m not saying the world is a nice place (it isn’t); you should, at
> >> the very least, secure*your* copyright by having a solid proof o
> On 23 May 2020, at 23:00, antlists wrote:
>
> On 23/05/2020 20:21, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>> I’m not saying the world is a nice place (it isn’t); you should, at
>> the very least, secure*your* copyright by having a solid proof of
>> anteriority, as we discussed. What I’m saying is that y
On 23/05/2020 20:21, Valentin Villenave wrote:
I’m not saying the world is a nice place (it isn’t); you should, at
the very least, secure*your* copyright by having a solid proof of
anteriority, as we discussed. What I’m saying is that you shouldn’t
overestimate the possible threat to your work
On 22/05/2020 13:26, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
IIUC, CC licences aim to protect against others making money from
your work. How is "ASCAP not being happy" related to that?
Unless I'm mistaken, LilyPond (GNU) and CC belong to the "eco-system"
where sharing is the norm (to enhance the common cult
On 5/23/20, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
> Hi Valentin - I am all new to these things and every time I look into
> this I get more confused.
No problem. (I’m adding back the list, just in case others may correct
me if I say something wrong and/or stupid.)
> Say I give a CC BY license to the work,
On 5/21/20, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
> In the spirit
> of open source, I initially wanted to use a CC-BY license on the work,
> then I read this and completely changed my mind.
> https://www.ascap.com/playback/2007/FALL/FEATURES/creative_commons_licensing,
> which somehow seems to contradict
>
Hi.
Le jeu. 21 mai 2020 à 19:57, Francesco Petrogalli
a écrit :
>
> OK, thank you all for the kind reply.
>
> Here is my understanding, just double cheking with you guys is my
> reasoning is right.
I can't follow the whole reasoning (see below), but the conclusion
seems nevertheless utterly unfa
OK, thank you all for the kind reply.
Here is my understanding, just double cheking with you guys is my
reasoning is right.
Step 1: secure the copyright of the PDF of the composition.
I am tempted to say that this is already done by the fact that I have
stored all commits of the development of th
> On May 21, 2020, at 3:34 AM, Valentin Villenave
> wrote:
>
> On 5/21/20, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
>> I have written it with lilypond, but it hasn't been performed yet. I
>> wanted to secure the copyright before performing it. Given that there
>> is no performing artist yet, there is no
See also: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1113
Cheers,
Pierre
Le jeu. 21 mai 2020 à 11:04, Federico Bruni a écrit :
> Il giorno gio 21 mag 2020 alle 10:33, Valentin Villenave
> ha scritto:
> > All you
> > need to have is a way of proving your anteriority if anyone were to
> > come and claim
Il giorno gio 21 mag 2020 alle 10:33, Valentin Villenave
ha scritto:
All you
need to have is a way of proving your anteriority if anyone were to
come and claim they’ve written it instead of you.
A modern alternative to sending a sealed package is digital
watermarking.
Francesco, as you are
On 5/21/20, Francesco Petrogalli wrote:
> I have written it with lilypond, but it hasn't been performed yet. I
> wanted to secure the copyright before performing it. Given that there
> is no performing artist yet, there is no recording, so I cannot
> register it with ASCAP. Have I got this right?
Hi Francesco,
Not sure if this gives you any help but the first thing I'd do in your case
is to secure the pdf with a password.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le jeu. 21 mai 2020 à 05:51, Francesco Petrogalli <
francesco.petroga...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> apologies in advance for the slightly off topi
26 matches
Mail list logo
