Hi Tzafrir,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> A new version of the complete r2l package is here: 0.1.0
>
> Emil: refreshd fails if BIDITEXT_FILENAME is not set. but you shouldn't
> query the environment directly: you should ask r2llib what is the token
> (as I did in t
Hi Tzafrir,
First, a question: Ignoring for a moment refreshd, do you want the
biditext script to support the --r2l-filename option?
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi Emil
>
>
> No. refreshd_hook.so shouldn't pass argv to r2l_init(). It is always run
> from another process, wi
Hi muli,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, mulix wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>
> > BTW: emil: the only warning I saw was:
> >
> > g++ -g -D_REENTRANT -Wall -pedantic
> > -I/home/tzafrir/projects/LinClub/BiditextGui/r2l-tarball/r2l-0.1.1/include
> > -I/home/tzafrir/projects/LinC
Attached is a patch for the man page.
Minor typo corrections and clarifications
Regards,
Emil
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, mulix wrote:
> added a biditext man page. it's not very up to date, nor
rsion?
>
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
>
> >
> >Attached is a patch for the man page.
> >
> > Minor typo corrections and clarifications
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
> Hi Tzafrir,
>
> What problems did you experience with refreshd?
> Can I help you with that?
>
>
> Emil
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > Another release
> >
> &g
Is this a side efect of the Turkish patch !??
;-
Emil
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Ahmet Olmez wrote:
> ###
> BU MESAJ BIR SPAM DEGILDIR#
> ##
> http://alisverissehri.kolayweb.com
afrir Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
>
> > Just an aside, make sure that on other (i.e. non-Linux) platforms the
> > ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET_ADDRESSES macro is not defined in refreshd_params.h
> >
> >
> >
Hi Tzafrir
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
> Hi Tzafrir,
>
> There should be no problem regarding its compilation, however if you
> compile it don't remove that macro from refreshd_params.h refreshd will
> not run correctly.
What I wanted to say here was that if
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, mulix wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball
> >
> > So I'd like to hear some success stories, and then get 1.0 out.
>
> i'm afraid i come bearing bad news.
> two rh 6.x machines. one one configure finishe
Hi Tzafrir,
It seems that things got messed up somehow with the tarball. I downloaded
r2l-0.9.4.tar.gz from
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/R2L/r2l-tarball/
and there are problems compiling it under Solaris.
It seems that there is a problem with the following line in the configure
script:
Hi Tzafrir,
It seems that the project is slowly but surely getting on the right track.
Here are some minor corrections. However there are some small annoyances
when trying to compile on Solaris:
1) biditext.in still contained some export var=name constructs (with
LD_PRELOAD). I have attached a f
Hi Tzafrir,
Played a little bit with the Solaris version.
The old problem with the path to install-sh is still there. A short
reminder of it:
Aftyer running
./configure
followed by:
gmake PREFIX=/path/to/install
the build process aborts when installing lib refreshd_cnt.a because the
path to
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Kohn Emil Dan wrote:
>
> > Hi Tzafrir,
> >
> > Played a little bit with the Solaris version.
> >
> > The old problem with the path to install-sh is still there. A short
> > reminder of
These fuckin' assholes try to outlaw opensource. Sorry for the harsh
language, but I cannot find any other way to characterize them. I hope
that it's just an April Fool's Day prank, but as I see it, it does not
seem to be the case.
Emil
15 matches
Mail list logo
