[PATCH V4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add machine support for 7 LCD on ORIGEN

2011-09-15 Thread Tushar Behera
ORIGEN board is fitted with 7 LCD panel HV070WSA. The pixel resolution of the LCD panel is 1024x600. Also power domain device for LCD0 is registered. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org --- Changes for V4: * Added gpio_free() call * Removed .refresh value as it

RE: ALIP filesystem

2011-09-15 Thread Frederik Lotter
Hi, I am using the ALIP filesystem with my own kernel and kernel modules (2.6.35). The startup seems to encounter 3 errors after which it does not proceed any further. If I am moving outside of an area you can help with I understand. If you can give me a tip on what could possibly be happening

Re: [PATCH V4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add machine support for 7 LCD on ORIGEN

2011-09-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tushar Behera, In message 1316076867-2138-1-git-send-email-tushar.beh...@linaro.org you wrote: ORIGEN board is fitted with 7 LCD panel HV070WSA. The pixel resolution of the LCD panel is 1024x600. ... +static struct s3c_fb_pd_win origen_fb_win0 = { + .win_mode = { +

Re: ALIP filesystem

2011-09-15 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:05:59AM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote: The startup seems to encounter 3 errors after which it does not proceed any further. If I am moving outside of an area you can help with I understand. If you can give me a tip on what could possibly be happening here that would

Re: [PATCH V4] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add machine support for 7 LCD on ORIGEN

2011-09-15 Thread Tushar Behera
Dear Wolfgang Denk, On Thursday 15 September 2011 02:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Tushar Behera, In message1316076867-2138-1-git-send-email-tushar.beh...@linaro.org you wrote: ORIGEN board is fitted with 7 LCD panel HV070WSA. The pixel resolution of the LCD panel is 1024x600. ...

Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, I am the author of OMAP display driver, and while developing it I've often felt that there's something missing in Linux's display area. I've been planning to write a post about this for a few years already, but I never got to it. So here goes at last! --- First I want to (try to) describe

NEON Optimization Forum - LC Orlando

2011-09-15 Thread Kurt Taylor
Since we have had over 300 views of NEON optimization on ask.linaro.org, it looks like there is enough interest in continuing the NEON Forum face2face meetings at LC Orlando. I am collecting topics for discussion and wanted to extend an invite to the broader team, to see if anyone wanted to

Re: [RFC] Upgrade Jenkins EC2 plugin to 1.13 on Android Build

2011-09-15 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Michael, On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:35:57 +1200 Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:18:34 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote: Hello, We're running Jenkins EC2 plugin v 1.11 on android-build.linaro.org, which is 2

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Kyungmin Park
Hi Tomi, On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: Hi, I am the author of OMAP display driver, and while developing it I've often felt that there's something missing in Linux's display area. I've been planning to write a post about this for a few years

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:07:05 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: This was a very rough and quite short proposal, but I'm happy to improve and extend it if it's not totally shot down. Jesse Barnes has put together a proposal much like this to work within the existing DRM

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:59 -0500, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:07:05 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: This was a very rough and quite short proposal, but I'm happy to improve and extend it if it's not totally shot down. Jesse Barnes has put together a

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:50:32 -0500 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
is and we could use it. Such attitude is not helpful and as I don't see any serious intention of the DRM guys to cooperate I think those subsystems are more likely to diverge. At least I'll never accept any change to the fb infrastructure that requires DRM. There are aspects of the fb code

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:50 -0500, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which everything

RE: 11.07 oprofile on panda busted?

2011-09-15 Thread Turgis, Frederic
Once the interrupt issue is resolved I might suggest sampling cpu-cycles as a workaround to real-time sampling granularity, except that there apparently is an issue with reliably getting interrupts from the PMU. Does anyone know if this is still a problem in the A9 (I've only seen it

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Rob Clark
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:50 -0500, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
What is your problem with discontigous framebuffers? (I assume discontigous refers to the pages the framebuffer is composed of) Sounds to me like you should implement your own fb_mmap and either map it contigous to screen_base or implement your own fb_read/write. In theory you could even have

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
As you have DRM now and as I'm not interested in wayland I won't discuss this, but I guess it might be a good start for Geert's question what would be needed to use it on dumb framebuffers. GMA500 is basically a 2D or dumb frame buffer setup but with a lot of rather complicated output and

Export kernel defconfig through android-build

2011-09-15 Thread Zach Pfeffer
I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I realized that's it a bit of a chore to extract the kernel config that got used. I thought, it may make sense to provide an way in android-build to control what gets

Re: Export kernel defconfig through android-build

2011-09-15 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I realized that's it a bit of a chore to extract the kernel config that got used.

Re: Export kernel defconfig through android-build

2011-09-15 Thread Zach Pfeffer
On 15 September 2011 15:58, James Westby james.wes...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote: I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
Okay, I see your problem. It's a bit strange you don't have acceleration. I The hardware has 3D acceleration but not open so we can't support it. There is no 2D acceleration - which seems to be increasingly common. At some point I'll add hardware scrolling however by using the GTT to implemnent

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
On 09/15/2011 03:50 PM, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which everything else is built,

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
Hi Alan, On 09/15/2011 05:18 PM, Alan Cox wrote: is and we could use it. Such attitude is not helpful and as I don't see any serious intention of the DRM guys to cooperate I think those subsystems are more likely to diverge. At least I'll never accept any change to the fb infrastructure

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the plan is to make DRM the core Linux display framework, upon which everything else is built, and fb and v4l2 are changed to use DRM. I'd

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Florian Tobias Schandinat florianschandi...@gmx.de wrote: On 09/15/2011 03:50 PM, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it doesn't help fb or v4l2 drivers. Except if the

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: While the DRM has historically targeted 3D acceleration, that is not a requirement to use the DRM KMS modesetting API.  The current fb API has no concept of display controllers or connectors or overlays, etc. To match it

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
On 09/15/2011 05:52 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Florian Tobias Schandinat florianschandi...@gmx.de wrote: On 09/15/2011 03:50 PM, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:29:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote: 1) It's part of DRM, so it

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
On 09/15/2011 06:58 PM, Alan Cox wrote: Well, I rather think that the fb API is more user centric to allow every program to use it directly in contrast to the KMS/DRM API which aims to support every feature the hardware has. For this the fb API should not change much, but I understand some

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:12:43 +, Florian Tobias Schandinat florianschandi...@gmx.de wrote: Interesting that this comes from the people that pushed the latest mode setting code into the kernel. But I don't think that this will happen, the exposed user interfaces will be around for

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Corbin Simpson
Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. On Sep 15, 2011 1:05 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: While the DRM has

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Corbin Simpson
Wasn't there a driver for qemu cirrus hardware? Sending from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. On Sep 15, 2011 1:05 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Florian Tobias Schandinat
On 09/15/2011 07:05 PM, Alan Cox wrote: What is your problem with discontigous framebuffers? (I assume discontigous refers to the pages the framebuffer is composed of) Sounds to me like you should implement your own fb_mmap and either map it contigous to screen_base or implement your own

Re: Proposal for a low-level Linux display framework

2011-09-15 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Florian Tobias Schandinat florianschandi...@gmx.de wrote: On 09/15/2011 06:58 PM, Alan Cox wrote: Well, I rather think that the fb API is more user centric to allow every program to use it directly in contrast to the KMS/DRM API which aims to support every

Building Linaro Android from source and replacing the kernel in an Linaro Android build

2011-09-15 Thread Zach Pfeffer
I get these questions a lot so I wrote some blog posts with the exact steps I used. http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/09/15/switching-out-a-pre-built-android-images-kernel/ http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/09/15/%EF%BB%BFbuilding-a-linaro-android-build-from-source/ Enjoy! -- Zach