lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi list... How's everyone today? Regarding Dirapi.dll, Iml32.dl, msvcrt.dll and Tbrsrc.dll, is it better to have them sitting next to the projector or within the xtras folder? And regarding my DLLs for my onStage xtra, Proj.dll and OnStage.dll, I believe those go next to the projector, right?

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Julian Weaver
with the onstage dlls, yes they go next to the projector. I recall including Tbrsrc.dll as well julian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: 15 July 2004 13:44

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Cole Tierney
How's everyone today? Good. You? Regarding Dirapi.dll, Iml32.dl, msvcrt.dll and Tbrsrc.dll, is it better to have them sitting next to the projector or within the xtras folder? I think it's cross platform consistent to put them beside the projector. Either macos or windows will also look in the

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread John Mathis
May I suggest you try with everything in the xtras folder...don't know about onstage or Tbrsrc, but I keep all the others in xtras. John Mathis Regarding Dirapi.dll, Iml32.dl, msvcrt.dll and Tbrsrc.dll, is it better to have them sitting next to the projector or within the xtras folder? And

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Johan Verhoeven
yep, me too.. all in the Xtra folder, 'till now no problems whatsoever. J. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] John Mathis Verzonden: donderdag 15 juli 2004 16:17 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: lingo-l All those DLLs May I suggest you try

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Onstage.dll and tbrscr.dll are OnStage xtras and go next to the projector. The other four I just put in the xtras folder, and no playback difference. Thanks, all. How's everyone today? Good. You? Fine, thanks! - MM [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Stephen Ingrum
ummm what dll files? I've never included those dll's with any project before- is this a MX 2004 thing? Thank you, Stephen Ingrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.LeagueofDesign.com http://www.leagueofdesign.com http://www.leagueofdesign.com Johan Verhoeven

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Troy Rollins
On Jul 15, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Stephen Ingrum wrote: ummm what dll files? I've never included those dll's with any project before- is this a MX 2004 thing? For fast start projectors, the DLLs are external. -- Troy RPSystems, Ltd. http://www.rpsystems.net [To remove yourself from this list, or

lingo-l Do MX 9 and MX 2004 co-exist?

2004-07-15 Thread Slava Paperno
The Upgrade Guide on the MM site doesn't mention this. Can someoone please tell me if the MX 9 continues to function normally on a Windows XP machine where the new MX 2004 is installed? Thanks! Slava [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to

Re: lingo-l system disk

2004-07-15 Thread nik crosina
thanks guys, best nik ___ Reduce your company's IT costs today with Officemaster. Sign up for a free trial! http://www.officemaster.net [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi

Re: lingo-l Do MX 9 and MX 2004 co-exist?

2004-07-15 Thread Mathew Ray
Yup, I have both installed on WinXP without an issue... Only irritating thing is that both icons look identical, so I had to change the one for the mx2004 exe just to make life easier :0) ~Mathew Slava Paperno wrote: The Upgrade Guide on the MM site doesn't mention this. Can someoone please

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Jeremy Aker
The DLL files mentioned are for creating a Fast Start Projector (see http://www.macromedia.com/support/director/ts/documents/d8_fast- start_stub_proj.htm or search TechNote #14431) in which the DLL's are included as external files instead of being packaged into the projector. As I recall,

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
For fast start projectors, the DLLs are external. There's more to it than that. It's a matter of insuring that your projector plays at all. The scenario: a projector is an executable, and it loads the .dll (dynamic link library) files at runtime. Anybody who has programmed in C/C++ knows all

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Troy Rollins
On Jul 15, 2004, at 12:18 PM, Kerry Thompson wrote: For fast start projectors, the DLLs are external. There's more to it than that. It's a matter of insuring that your projector plays at all. But if the projector is not Fast Start, aren't the DLLs simply included within the executable? -- Troy

lingo-l multilanguage project

2004-07-15 Thread Mathew Ray
Perhaps this is the wrong forum but I know there are quite a few international folks on this list and others who have done quite a few international projects... Anyway, I am about to embark upon a multilanguage project with multilanguage installers and had a few questions about double-byte

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
But if the projector is not Fast Start, aren't the DLLs simply included within the executable? No, I don't think so. It's been 4-5 years since I've programmed in C++, so I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure things are still the same. First, look at the name--dynamic link library. That

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Troy Rollins
On Jul 15, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Kerry Thompson wrote: That typically does not include the .dll in the executable. In fact, if you don't specifically load the .dll in your code, at the right time, you will get errors, either at run time or during the build (I don't remember exactly--it's been too

RE: lingo-l multilanguage project

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
Perhaps this is the wrong forum but I know there are quite a few international folks on this list and others who have done quite a few international projects... Anyway, I am about to embark upon a multilanguage project with multilanguage installers and had a few questions about

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
All, Now, here's the rub. Sometimes installers will put Dirapi.dll, Iml32.dl, and/or msvcrt.dll into the Windows system directory. ... While this is correct, somebody has installers somewhere that do this, it doesn't _appear_ to be ours (MACR's) that do this. We recently faced some nasty bugs

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Mathew Ray
Troy's interpretation, I believe, is the same as mine. From what I know on OS9 and PC systems standalone projectors could be just that...standalone. Anything needed was contained within the exe. Now with OSX, I believe the preferred method of creating projectors is with fast start projectors in

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
All, But if the projector is not Fast Start, aren't the DLLs simply included within the executable? Standard projectors contain copies of all the needed DLL's. Compressed projectors (not found in MX'04 anymore) contained compressed copies of the needed DLL's. Shockwave projectors don't

RE: lingo-l get and set pixel.

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
I am not sure what you mean by ink modes in copypixels. Any examples? Here ya go: destImg.copyPixels(srcImage,destRect,srcRect,[#ink: 36]) The above applies ink 36 (bgtrans) to the copyPixels operation, there are many options you can use here (blend levels, masking options, and more). This

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
So, then, you are suggesting that there is no such thing as a single icon self-contained executable Director movie on Windows? I don't think that is the case. You may be right--I'm not sure. I don't think the .dll's are included in a normal projector, but I'm too far away from the C/C++

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Slava Paperno
Tom, Shouldn't your Point 4 include and any subfolders within it? I've always used subfolders within the Xtras folder but never knew how many levels down the projector looks. It might be useful to know. Thanks for an excellent writeup, I'll save it. Slava At 10:36 AM 7/15/04 -0700, you

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
1. Look inside the projector, are the DLL's there? If yes, unpack them to a temp directory and link against those temporary copies. Aha! Now it makes sense. The .dll's are packaged with the .exe, just like the xtras, but are not really part of the core executable. They're still loaded at

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
Slava, Shouldn't your Point 4 include and any subfolders within it? For the DLL files I think the answer is no, they might have to be top-level in the Xtras folder (someone want to test that?). For any Xtras then the answer is yes, up to five levels of sub-folders IIRC. Cheers, Tom Higgins

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
Aha! Now it makes sense. The .dll's are packaged with the .exe, just like the xtras, but are not really part of the core executable. They're still loaded at runtime, after unpacking. It appears they aren't statically linked. Bingo, it's that unpack then linkload bit you weren't clear on.

Re: lingo-l Do MX 9 and MX 2004 co-exist?

2004-07-15 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
Hi Slava I'm currently running Director 8, 8.5, MX and MX 2004 on my WinXP Pro machine with no problems at all. The only thing you'll find is the the file extensions will map themselves to the last version you installed so you'll get a couple of niggling problems when double-clicking files or

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Tom: Thanks for the great answer. Slava: I develop on Windows, and everything that goes in my xtras folder goes inside a subfolder called pc, so that means an extra level into the xtras folder for my dlls, and it worked fine. Regards all, - Michael M. [To remove yourself from this list, or to

Re: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread John Mathis
Bingo, it's that unpack then linkload bit you weren't clear on. Glad to read it's sorted and that my info helped. Let me add this: If your standard projector starts, and then crashes (or perhaps is rudely quit) you will leave the dlls in the temp folder that was created, wasting space.

Re: lingo-l get and set pixel.

2004-07-15 Thread Alex da Franca
At 20:36 Uhr +0300 15.07.2004, thor wrote: I am not sure what you mean by ink modes in copypixels. Any examples? it depends on what you're after with the: At 13:47 Uhr +0100 14.07.2004, thor wrote: rgbval = member(firstImg).image.getPixel(xx, yy) -- some calculations here and then

RE: lingo-l All those DLLs

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Higgins
Slava: I develop on Windows, and everything that goes in my xtras folder goes inside a subfolder called pc, so that means an extra level into the xtras folder for my dlls, and it worked fine. Thanks for that confirmation Michael. Cheers, Tom Higgins Product Manager - Director Team

Re: lingo-l multilanguage project

2004-07-15 Thread Mathew Ray
Just took a look at the most recent version, but the latest digital version accessible via their site is June's issue (the one with tooltips in director by irv). I guess the digital versions lag behind the print versions... Fortunately the unicode will be self contained within flash, so that

RE: lingo-l multilanguage project

2004-07-15 Thread Kerry Thompson
Thanks for the info about the hiragana and katakana info... Would it be safe to say that most translation agencies worth their salt should provide material in all 4 scripts? Probably, but it's more accurate to say they would provide it as a Japanese speaker would expect to see it.

Re: lingo-l Director error code -1101: ANSWER

2004-07-15 Thread Sean Wilson
The only solution we were able to find is to use MX 2004. AND to be sure to use axConvertToFile(soundName, filename, MPEG3/SWA) on a sound file that is _already_ mono OR to use axSetEnvironmentInfo(convertNumChannels, 1) prior to conversion. And that these problems seem, to date, to be