https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/mind-reading-may-help-those-who-cannot-speak/
2019jul31 cosmosmagazine.com 'Mind-reading' may help those who cannot speak
NEWS BIOLOGY 31 JULY 2019
Decoding brain signals can make conversation possible. Mark Bruer reports.
Researchers have decoded brain
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 11:52 +1000, David wrote:
> On Monday, 5 August 2019 11:07:17 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is a vastly different proposition to decoding thoughts.
> > Well - yes and no. And you still need to decode the speech.
> Interesting... I interpreted "decoding
On Monday, 5 August 2019 11:07:17 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
>> This is a vastly different proposition to decoding thoughts.
>
> Well - yes and no. And you still need to decode the speech.
Interesting... I interpreted "decoding thoughts" as identifying a concept, or
an intention, before it's
On Sunday, 4 August 2019 11:40:47 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
> It is now. That doesn't mean it can never be. We should not discard a
> technology because it is rough now. But likewise we shouldn't trust it while
> it is still rough - or rather we should know its limits and use it within
> them.
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 10:45 +1000, David wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 August 2019 11:40:47 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I can't imagine thought commands being better fidelity.
> > You know better than to use the argument from personal incredulity
> > :-)
> [...]the device picked up nerve
On Sunday, 4 August 2019 11:40:47 AEST Karl Auer wrote:
>> I can't imagine thought commands being better fidelity.
>
> You know better than to use the argument from personal incredulity :-)
I think Jan's right!
Recently The Guardian ran a piece "Neuroscientists decode brain speech signals
into
On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 10:47 +1000, JLWhitaker wrote:
> Exactly. I replied to the friend who sent the link to me that relying
> on voice input is nuts.
It is now. That doesn't mean it can never be. We should not discard a
technology because it is rough now. But likewise we shouldn't trust it
while
On 4/08/2019 10:22 AM, Roger Clarke wrote:
On 4/8/19 9:30 am, JLWhitaker wrote:
We gotta have better do overs.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/03/wrongful-arrest-life-saving-romance-typos-that-changed-lives
The disappointing thing about the article is that he finishes
On 4/8/19 9:30 am, JLWhitaker wrote:
We gotta have better do overs.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/03/wrongful-arrest-life-saving-romance-typos-that-changed-lives
The disappointing thing about the article is that he finishes with a
comment that's both a non sequitur and
