you conveniently left out what i was responding to. He said there are many
people in the _US_ that don't give a rats ass.
i couldn't care less what 1.2 billion in china think. and i'm sure they feel
the same way.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Can we take this stuff off the list and into personal messages? This is
really getting stale.
What do we have here?? - a little microcosm of what's going on in the world.. methinks.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:19:59 -0600
Little, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you conveniently left out what i was responding to. He said there are many
people in the _US_ that don't give a rats ass.
i
There is a native z/VM implementation of the NTP available off of the IBM VM
download page (http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages). Look for the
TIMESERV package there; it allows all of your Linux machines to sync up to
the VM TOD clock.
Dave Jones
Sine Nomine Associates
Houston
- Original
To have Linux Sync with the TOD of VM is there a setting in the Linux
environment or is this done automagically or do we use NTP and given VM as
a server?
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
(804)697-3925
FRIT - Infrastructure Engineering
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL
One of the Sydney radio stations does periodic calls to Australian ex-pats
around the world, and broadcasts the interviews over the air and on their
web site. If you've never met Neale in person, it's a nice chat. If you're
coming to the zExpo in Vegas next week, this will also allow you to
you conveniently left out what i was responding to. He said there are many
people in the _US_ that don't give a rats ass.
i couldn't care less what 1.2 billion in china think. and i'm sure they feel
the same way.
And the 1.5 billion Muslims the USA is currently pissing off something rotten.
Has anyone come across a good document or HOWTO for LDAP and zLinux?
I would like to create an authentication scheme for my Linux guests where
they would authenticate to an LDAP. While I have experience doing this, I
would like to see something like a best practices or suggestions for
We're running Suse Sles8 SP 2 on vm 4.3.0
cd to a mount point and do a ll , the session freezes, just never comes
back.
We have been doing some snapshot testing and tsm was recovering the mount
point
but that process is no longer running.
/proc/dasd/devices show the address active.
vgdisplay and
This is for a z/OS-based RACF/LDAP system that is used to validate Linux
logins:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp0221.pdf
-Original Message-
Has anyone come across a good document or HOWTO for LDAP and zLinux?
I would like to create an authentication scheme for my Linux
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 16:42, David Boyes wrote:
web site. If you've never met Neale in person, it's a nice chat. If you're
coming to the zExpo in Vegas next week, this will also allow you to practice
your listening skills for Australian accents.
Neat! It looks like not all Aussies speak as
To have Linux Sync with the TOD of VM is there a setting in the Linux
environment or is this done automagically or do we use NTP
and given VM as
a server?
You get the correct time from VM at Linux IPL. If you want constant
correction, you need NTP in the Linuxen, pointed at either the VM SNTP
I probably need to add one other item, I would like to integrate this into
my existing distributed environment where I could also authenticate
Solaris systems to the LDAP as well. I would also like to maintain a
level of portability, pick it up and go. You never know, zLinux is very
new and
Frank,
Does this happen in directories other than the one you mention? If so, it
might indicate a mis-match between your network interface MTU size and that
of your connecting network.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Hubble, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November
Does this happen in directories other than the one you mention? If so, it
might indicate a mis-match between your network interface MTU size and that
of your connecting network.
it only happens with this one directory. all the others are fine.
a restore is being ran on a different mount point
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 10:37, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Neat! It looks like not all Aussies speak as fast as Neale does :-)
He's been overclocked. All that beer you see him drinking? Coolant.
Adam
The basic implementation is the same as you would do it elsewhere, but some
things we've found:
1) It's a good idea to replicate the commonly used portions of the tree on
local (inside the VM box) LDAP server(s). Cuts down a lot on network
traffic, improves availability, and lets you selectively
Stop this aspect of it...
And f*rt as you leave the room
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] US constitution (was RE: SCO Attacks Open Source
License )
you conveniently
Is this because the patches that are put out for 2.4.21 weren't being
integrated into 2.4.22 by Marcello? Or is something else not happening
that
should? Without understanding what's happening, I would think that more
of
the patches to 2.4.21 would have been in 2.4.22.
We have quite a lot
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] US constitution (was RE: SCO Attacks Open Source
License )
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:54:47 +0100
This thing is off and running. Genies and bottles. And any action
taken in US courts by
anyone is just
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:20:49 -0500 Ferguson, Neale said:
Can we take this stuff off the list and into personal messages? This is
really getting stale.
I agree. I'm sorry (really!) that I didn't jump in yesterday. This is
getting a little far afield from Linux on zSeries.
Dave Jones's original
The problem with using ntpdate in this way is that the time can go backwards.
THis may not be a problem for some applications, but I can think of quite a
few where this would not be helpful :-)
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:41, Vic Cross wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Eric Sammons wrote:
I wonder whether
The ones we see most commonly are:
1) NIS/NIS+-based (primarily in sites with a Sun background). Works OK, and
is familiar territory for most Unix heads.
2) Combination of LDAP and Kerberos 5. Increasingly popular, as Microsoft's
AD can be forced to play nice with it.
3) Pure Kerberos 5.
voice-of-narrator
We interrupt our regularly scheduled nation bashing
to bring you a real question.
/voice-of-narrator
to the good folks in Boeblingen ...
Okay ... the CDL mode of the current DASD driver rams the
key and data content together. Yuck! That is, if I read from
offset 0x2000, I
See Dave Boyes' answer for enumeration and details.
Here, we're a heavily NIS based shop w/r/t Unix.
Almost all of our mainframe Linux use NIS for user authentication
as well as for the automounter maps.
-- R;
Martin,
Thanks for the information. That's a serious problem, from my perspective.
Now if there were only a way to fix it. :(
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Martin Schwidefsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Anyone have any site links/information about integrating LDAP with AD?
Well, I think we're all pretty much agreed that it's the *perception* of
poor CPU performance, rather than the reality, that's the big
Linux/zSeries problem.
Therefore, may I present the following humble suggestion, aimed at
correcting this misperception among the, well, young and impressionable?
Adam:
I like where you're going with this idea... People's perception of a
computer are completely out of line with reality. I know this is a bit off
track, but it does remind me of the movie War Games. I distinctly
remember a chubby guy (computer geek) sticking his head in a 3420 tape drive
Hi all, we are in the process of migration of our mail server, we are
using qmail with ldap and horde for the web mail, actually we have our
mail server with qmail only, but we use an antivirus, did somebody is
using an Antivirus for a mail server and linux390? if so, what antivirus?
i think that
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 18:34, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
Hi all, we are in the process of migration of our mail server, we are
using qmail with ldap and horde for the web mail, actually we have our
mail server with qmail only, but we use an antivirus, did somebody is
using an Antivirus
31 matches
Mail list logo
