Or use jdbc (but i'm not sure about it)
WBR, Sergey
Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23.11.2003 06:33
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Accessing DB2 connect from
Okay one more question has arisen from this... and I'll preface the
situation thus:
WebSphere on z/Linux is kicking the pants off WebSphere on os/390. I got
the DB2 runtime client to work on linux2 to talk to db2 connect on linux1,
but now I'm being asked is there a DB2 connect runtime client
On Saturday, 11/22/2003 at 08:27 EST, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just checked the latest version of this document, lx24jun03dd02.pdf,
and
it still gives examples like this:
Or for two network devices (CTC + ESCON):
ctc0,0x601,0x600
escon3,0x605,0x608
Who do I need to contact
I guess you could say we're looking to see if the DB2 engine is part of the
problem, or if the issue is entirely within WebSphere on OS/390. We were
surprised with the absolute orders of magnitude difference in performance
on z/Linux vs OS/390. The z/Linux instance running WebSphere is getting
I guess the question becomes, how fully loaded are the three engines
that z/OS is running on? I'm no z/OS person, so I can't really speak to
it's performance.
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 08:43, James Melin wrote:
I guess you could say we're looking to see if the DB2 engine is part of the
problem, or
The 3 engine box is running maybe 40-60% and the 1 engie machien maybe 65%.
So I'm really not seeing a resource issue. Just a platform one.
|-+
| | Rich Smrcina |
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | om
Hi Jim,
It uses a Log Structured Array to map virtual tracks
to the back end raid array hardware. This is analogous
to a paging in MVS. As in MVS, a track is not
allocated on the hardware until it is written to.
This is kinda how evms builds a sparse LV. The logical volume is divided
up into
Alan,
I understand that they are synonyms _now_. The problem is, they didn't
start out that way, and the lack of appropriate documentation to that effect
has caused problems in the field. (Perhaps only to me, but still)
I'm not saying that code changes need to be made (at this point), just
I just finished installing and configuring SLES8 running under z/VM. I was
in the process of setting up samba to start automatically when the instance
is booted. I added a symbolic link to rc3.d . After that I did a shutdown
-r now. Now all I get is the following error:
HCPGIR453W CP entered;
That's exactly what MVS does. But the problem being referenced was the need
to have sufficient free space on the volume to allow those secondary
extents to be allocated. If you have datasets that get extended frequently
in this way, you need to keep your volumes at a fairly low utilization so
I would IPL from your reader, mount your file systems, chroot to them, and
re-run zipl. I just ran into this recently when my IPL information seemed
to evaporate for no discernable reason on a SLES8 system.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Marist EDU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Monday 24 November 2003 19:21, Marist EDU wrote:
After that I did a shutdown
-r now. Now all I get is the following error:
HCPGIR453W CP entered; program interrupt loop
I have logged the user off and on again but this is the only message I get.
Anyone have any ideas ??
Sounds like the
What benefits should we expect to see using the 2.6 Linux kernel on the
390/zSeries platform?
Thanks
Take a look at Ulrich Weigand's presentation on this at:
http://linuxvm.org/present/SHARE100/S9361uwa.pdf
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Kent Pirkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Benefits to expect using the 2.6
I have forwared this discussion to the developers and
they do know about the problem. In SP3, they have set
the DBL1STAR field of the fmt1 DSCB to zero to show
100% full in SP3.
However, the bottom line is the same - beware of IXFP
DDSR from MVS against a Linux CDL volume, especially
prior to SP3
Jim,
Since you have their ear, it would be really nice if the Format 1 DSCB
which describe the partitions were to be marked
RECFM=FB,LRECL=4096,BLKSIZE=4096,DSORG=PS and RACF Indicated and Write
Password Required. Why? It would make it a bit easier to access the DSN
from the MVS side for backup.
On Monday, 11/24/2003 at 01:19 EST, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand that they are synonyms _now_. The problem is, they didn't
start out that way, and the lack of appropriate documentation to that
effect
has caused problems in the field. (Perhaps only to me, but still)
I think I read someplace that they wrote gcc on a SUN box, so I guess they used the
SUN C compiler to get started. The SUN C compiler was based on the MIT C compiler,
which was based on PCC from V7 Unix I think. PCC was written on the PDP-11 using DMRs
C compiler. I think DMR wrote the first
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:28:45 -0500
From: Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Benefits to expect using the 2.6 kernel on 390/zSeries?
Take a look at Ulrich Weigand's
I'm trying to build a 2.4.19 kernel with as many modules as possible for
installation purposes. I'm also trying to load those modules with a kernel
that has a number of things compiled into it for testing reasons. After I
load the qdio and qeth modules, the ifconfig command starts generating
Which is why I was asking for a name/place to contact in the first place. I
don't mind dropping hate mail into the appropriate mailbox. I just need to
know which one, first. :)
I was hoping someone from Boeblingen would provide me with a contact
name/address, since that does seem the most
21 matches
Mail list logo
