Nick Laflamme said,
Coincidentally, I asked about this at yesterday's Hillgang meeting here
near Washington, DC, in conjunction with IBM's Performance Toolkit on
VM. The responses I got was that the data from this agent wasn't
accurate and that the agent itself was expensive to run.
Hi Nick,
Can
Post, Mark K wrote:
He could always use 104 and 105 for the read/write channels, and 103 as the
data channel.
But that was the point Bruce and I were fighting about. If you were
attaching the 3 devices of a tripod to a virtual machine you could, but
if you define a VSWITCH you specify the first o
He could always use 104 and 105 for the read/write channels, and 103 as the
data channel.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob
van der Heij
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 4:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
B
Joe Poole wrote:
There is another monitor available - RMFPM. If you have RMF running on
the z/OS side of the wall, check out
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/rmf/rmfhtmls/pmweb/pmweb.htm
Coincidentally, I asked about this at yesterday's Hillgang meeting here
near Washington, DC,
Dave MYERS wrote:
hmmm...I don't see the -1 kernel in /lib/modules...
the SP3 install must have removed it??
Would an uninstall of the SP3 kernel,
followed by an install of the kernel on the SP2 CD...work??
Maybe the YaST process takes care of that. I believe the pure rpm
upgrade does not.
Yes, p
I am running Quagga 96.4 with OSPF. I am running SuSE Linux SLES8 SP03 in
a native LPAR. I am using 2 OSA/e 100-megabit Ethernet interfaces as shown
below:
eth0 has an IP address of 10.28.93.50
eth1 has an IP address of 10.28.91.50
Since these are two equal cost routes, I would expect OSPF to p
I've got two Linux systems (A & B) and I've got some RxSock
programs that run between them. I'm slightly confused.
Could someone with a better understanding of this
stuff confirm or deny the things below please? Thanks.
(Ignore the coding style, it's the concepts that're important.)
A
do forever
Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We exceeded the threshold for daily number of posts. I've freed up 23
pending missives, and
we're back live and on-air now.
This can happen to any LISTSERV-based list. It happens from time to time
with the mainframe HLASM list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list
We exceeded the threshold for daily number of posts. I've freed up 23
pending missives, and we're back live and on-air now.
This is becoming a quarterly ritual; lots of new subscribers, lots more
volume, lots of healthy conversation on a topic near and dear to our
hearts. It's a good thing. ;)
-
It appears that VMESA-L has been "on hold" since
at least 0200 CDT Thursday.
Anybody have any idea what the problem is?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Dave Jones has the same problem.
Rod
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Alan, we're not getting anything either, and the VMESA-L archive site at
U of Ark. only has posts up until about two days ago.
Alan Altmark wrote:
"Where, oh where has the listserver gone, oh where, oh where can he be?"
(Sung to the tune of My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean.)
Is VMESA-L running or is
I'm not getting anything from the VMESA-L list, either.
Alan Altmark wrote:
"Where, oh where has the listserver gone, oh where, oh where can he be?"
(Sung to the tune of My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean.)
Is VMESA-L running or is it just rejecting posts from IBM (and not
honoring our subscriptions)?
There is some discussion going on in the pipelines group about this also. I know that
yesterday there was some
discussion on the VM list about viruses that were apparently coming from the list
(even though I did see any). That
may have something to do with the problems.
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:
"Where, oh where has the listserver gone, oh where, oh where can he be?"
(Sung to the tune of My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean.)
Is VMESA-L running or is it just rejecting posts from IBM (and not
honoring our subscriptions)?
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM Development
--
hmmm...I don't see the -1 kernel in /lib/modules...
the SP3 install must have removed it??
Would an uninstall of the SP3 kernel,
followed by an install of the kernel on the SP2 CD...work??
Subject: Re: How to revert back to SP2 kernel level ??
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dave MYERS
Ref: Your note of Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:20:35 +0200 (attached)
Apparently it can - I had my doubts, but that's what they gave me:
q vswitch
VSWITCH SYSTEM VSWITCH1 Type: VSWITCH Active: 0 MAXCONN: INFINITE
PERSISTENT RESTRICTEDNONROUTER MFS: 8192 ACCOUNTING: OFF
State: Ready
CO
Bruce Hayden wrote:
Yes, generate more OSA I/O devices and then specify one of them (such as
103) for the vswitch. I have exactly this configuration working on a
couple of systems. This is not unlike sharing an OSA between LPARS, but
in this case the sharing is all within the same LPAR.
Well no
Dave MYERS wrote:
Can I revert to the SP2 kernel by simple uninstalling SP3 the kernel RPM?
I very much doubt it... but afaik the k_deflt package leaves the old
kernel and modules there, so what you could do is change the symlink
/boot/kernel point to the old directory there, and run zipl again.
19 matches
Mail list logo
