Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread mf390
I do not know if there's a version of Flex-ES that's had its 64-bit emulation recoded from x86 to x86-64. I would not be surprised if Hercules compiled for x86-64 would outperform Flex-ES built for x86 for the same 64-bit workload, but I am not in a position to do more than guess at that. For a

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
Post, Mark K wrote: Yes, it was intended to be a part of the GCC suite at some point in the future. At the time I compiled and tested it, the compiler was not yet to the point of generating any code. All it was doing was syntax checking. I doubt very much it would ever generate code that

Re: RHEL vs SUSE question again

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
Evans, Kevin R wrote: Currently we're using RHEL4 on z and Fedora Core for desktops. We keep running into a wall with Java and different products using different versions of Java. Between the GNU Java compiler, IBM's Java for Eclipse with MQ Series to Sun Java for AJAX. We're swimming in too

Re: RHEL vs SUSE question again

2006-09-20 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 9/20/06, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATI and nVidia video drivers have a certain reputation: I don't use them, but it seems not all users of either are entirely happy. I trust you did notice he was asking about Linux on z/VM... And even on Intel platform I would hope the

Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Massimiliano Belardi
Hy guys, how is possible to get the service pack level from my zLinux system? Usually I get a kernel level issuing uname -a but I cannot see witch service pack is related to it. Is there another command or another file to see this information? Thanks Max

Re: How to signal a Linux guest from z/VM?

2006-09-20 Thread Romanowski, John (OFT)
If anyone else needs it, C code for Malcolm Beattie's ext-int kernel module to process external interrupts is in IBM's Redbook Large Scale Linux Deployment at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246824.html Using the ext_int module, you can send a signal to a specified process upon receiving

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Pinion
The Rascal Pascal! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/19/2006 8:25 PM Post, Mark K wrote: Yes, it was intended to be a part of the GCC suite at some point in the future. At the time I compiled and tested it, the compiler was not yet to the point of generating any code. All it was doing was syntax

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Dominic Coulombe
Hi, Try the SPident command. Regards. On 9/20/06, Massimiliano Belardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy guys, how is possible to get the service pack level from my zLinux system? Usually I get a kernel level issuing uname -a but I cannot see witch service pack is related to it. Is there

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Stahr, Lea
I do not have an spident command (command not found) on SLES 8. Lea Stahr Sr. System Administrator Linux/Unix Team 630-753-5445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dominic Coulombe Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:06

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Mark D Pace
Try the SPident command. This may or may not give you the results you want. If you haven't applied the SP3 directly, but rather just maintained your system using YOU, SPident will tell you that your system is not up-to-date. :~ sudo SPident CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date! found

Re: RHEL vs SUSE question again

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
Rob van der Heij wrote: On 9/20/06, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ATI and nVidia video drivers have a certain reputation: I don't use them, but it seems not all users of either are entirely happy. I trust you did notice he was asking about Linux on z/VM... And even on Intel

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
David Boyes Sine Nomine Associates and if you'd like to know more http://www.bbc.co.uk/learnwelsh/.. OTOH I suspect Spanish is probably more useful in most of the world. Remember, you're talking to a crowd that probably had to learn COBOL to survive... 8-) Spanish may be more useful,

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Dominic Coulombe
The package was introduced with SP3 or SP4 under SLES8 if my memory is correct. You can download the package from the Novell patch repository and then you will be able to evaluate which SP is installed. And it is SPident, located in /usr/bin/SPident . Regards. On 9/20/06, Stahr, Lea [EMAIL

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Dominic Coulombe
In that case, run SPident - (yes, 4 v) and try to understand which packages were not updated correctly. You need only to have one conflicting package to receive a not up-to-date status. On 9/20/06, Mark D Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try the SPident command. This may or may not give

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
Jay Maynard wrote: A nice fast 8-way Opteron would probably outrun the average PartnerWorld Flex-ES box, but that's hardly an apples-to-apples comparison. :-) I'd be content to judge their finest against the finest alternative to be a fair comparison. If _I_ wanted the best possible box to

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Mark D Pace
I do not have an spident command (command not found) on SLES 8 Also watch your case it's SPident not spident Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems 1700 Summit Lake Drive Tallahassee, FL. 32317 Office: 850.219.5184 Fax: 888.221.9862 http://www.mainline.com This

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Stahr, Lea
I tried both. Lea Stahr Sr. System Administrator Linux/Unix Team 630-753-5445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D Pace Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:34 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Service

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
I don't really understand what Flex-ES is - I have some idea it's some hardware-plus-software imitation mainframe. FlexES is a software mainframe processor and I/O system emulation product that has historically been the only emulated mainframe solution blessed by IBM, ie that you could legally

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Jay Maynard
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:28:13PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: A nice fast 8-way Opteron would probably outrun the average PartnerWorld Flex-ES box, but that's hardly an apples-to-apples comparison. :-) I'd be content to judge their finest against the finest alternative to be a fair

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Jay Maynard
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:38:14AM -0400, David Boyes wrote: About the same, realistically (albeit throwing more hardware at a Hercules solution is a LOT cheaper). The key issue is that you can legally license IBM software on FlexES; you can't do that on Hercules. I'd say it's not known

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
Post, Mark K wrote: Yes, it was intended to be a part of the GCC suite at some point in the future. At the time I compiled and tested it, the compiler was not yet to the point of generating any code. All it was doing was syntax checking. I doubt very much it would ever generate code

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
Well, if you're just doing z/Linux, you can throw one hell of a fast box at the problem with Hercules for what you would spend on Flex-ES. This is *very* true. A 8 core name-brand Opteron system with 16G of RAM prices out at a little under $7K list. Whitebox Opteron systems are about $1K

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
I'd say it's not known whether you can do that on Hercules. AFAIK, nobody has ever gotten a refusal to license on Hercules at any price from IBM in writing. If such a document exists, I'd appreciate seeing it; until I do, there's been enough FUD thrown around from one particular party that

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread LJ Mace
I tried the command and got: foundSLES-9-s390-SP1 + online updates expected SLES-9-s390-SP3 l21:/opt/scripts # uname -a Linux l2x1 2.6.5-7.276-s390 #1 SMP Mon Jul 24 10:45:31 UTC 2006 s390 s390 s390 GNU/Linux What does it mean expected? I thought we were at sp3?? thanks Mace ---

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Dominic Coulombe
As I mentionned earlier, you might want to run SPident - to check which packages were not correctly updated, then run the update manually (rpm -Fvh myfile.rpm). You should be able to work your way around with this. On 9/20/06, LJ Mace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the command and

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Marcy Cortes
I have found that it's not updating package sles-release if you've just use the online-update (or equiv ) method. Haven't had time to pursue that minor annoyance. Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to

Re: FCP over ECKD performance advantage - why?

2006-09-20 Thread Yu Safin
On 9/12/06, Bill Bitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It depends. From a response time perspective, the bulk of the difference is dependent on the hardware. FICON/FCP to DS8000 both will likely give similar response time. Processor time, particularly in a virtualized environment will vary

Re: Betr.: Re: FCP over ECKD performance advantage - why?

2006-09-20 Thread Yu Safin
On 9/13/06, Pieter Harder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have one problem with the info provided by this reference. Nowhere I can find does it talk about the dedicated FCP being single-path or multi-path. If the measurements were done with a multi-path setup -- great. If the measurements were done

Re: Open systems and FCP

2006-09-20 Thread Yu Safin
On 9/13/06, Tom Duerbusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have been looking at an IBM VTS setup for quite a while. Well, now the network people (open systems group) is interested. Apparently, with the B18, we can also share it with Win/2000, Win/XP and the like. Just need another card for the

FCP over ECKD performance advantage - why?

2006-09-20 Thread Barton Robinson
When you DO have performance problems, with ECKD you can identify the problem, as there is lots of instrumentation. WIth FCP support, the instrumentation is very limited. Thus performance advantages are dependent on everything working perfectly which doesn't happen in my world. Performance

Re: FCP over ECKD performance advantage - why?

2006-09-20 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 9/20/06, Yu Safin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the results from the IBM benchmark and the comments in this paper, I am a bit confused as to when to use FCP and when to use ECKD. Assuming an EMC Symm. disk subsystem, zVM and SLES, wouldn't I want to keep my multipath simple by using ECKD

Fw: [LINUX-390] Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread John Campbell
I had once commented that IBM should've brought out a Klingonaase version of ViaVoice; I'm sure that would have sold *exceptionally* well at SciFi conventions. John R. Campbell, Speaker to Machines (GNUrd) (813) 356-5322 (t/l 697) Adsumo ergo raptus sum MacOS X: Because

Re: RHEL vs SUSE question again

2006-09-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 09/20/2006 at 02:18 ZE2, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having a single OSA portname in the device that must be presented by the Linux device driver is a pretty dumb idea when you want to virtualize things. Right. So why specify the OSA portname? We got rid of that

Fw: [LINUX-390] Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread John Campbell
Jay Maynard clarified: John Summerfield wrote: In such an environment, lack of VM might not matter so much, the virtualisation could be done natively rather than in the emulated environment. Indeed. Simply run multiple copies of Hercules. This only works, of course, as long as you're not

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Jon Brock
What would interest me more would be getting gcc available in z/OS Unix System Services. But that's another list . . . Jon snip If there is serious interest in funding someone to do it, we have the people and are willing to get it done. /snip

SLES9 non-QDIO Install

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Lauck
Has anyone recently done a successful SLES9 install under z/VM using non-QDIO OSAs? From z/VM we have connectivity to our Linux install workstation, can FTP files across but when we start the SLES9 install dialog and enter all the networking info it cannot detect the network. Here is a

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Would this do? http://www.spftools.com/downloads/gccmvs.htm -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: September 20, 2006 14:31 To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: PL/I and C cross compilers What would interest me more would be

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Post, Mark K
This is one reason why I prefer using the online_update command, as opposed to YaST. I can easily specify all patch types, and when I'm done, SPident displays the results I expect. Of course, with SLES10, that command goes away. Sigh. Time to learn about rug and zmd and Deity knows what else.

Hillgang Presentations from 2006-09-14

2006-09-20 Thread Neale Ferguson
Available at: http://www.sinenomine.net/node/565 Neale -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread J Leslie Turriff
From the gcc for VM/ESA download package: GCC R323 for VM/ESA === This memo describes the initial release of a GCC R323 for VM. The code is mostly take from Paul Edward's native MVS port from (http://www.spftools.com/downloads/gccmvs.htm) which in turn is based on Dave Pitts

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Charlie Crochet
Mace, I had the same results as you several months ago after using YAST to apply online updates up through SP3. YAST did not automatically select all of our packages. Here's how I was able to get clean results from the SPident command. 1. SPident -vvv (like Dominic stated) 2. Note the

Domino on VM

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Forbes
Does anyone successfully run Domino 6.5.x on Linux Vm? As the Domino administrator I do not have a baseline for performance on any of these boxes. Niether can I speak to the way the vm has been setup. I am basing my opinion on my experience with the existing zlinux installs here and the number

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Jon Brock
That's certainly interesting. I hadn't heard of PDPCLIB or the whole SPFTOOLS stuff before. The problem I have had here is lack of a C compiler on z/OS (not to mention lack of time, talent, expertise, marbles, and sundry other things). Who knows? If I get a few things

Way,way OT: Klingon voice recognition.

2006-09-20 Thread David Boyes
I had once commented that IBM should've brought out a Klingonaase version of ViaVoice; I'm sure that would have sold *exceptionally* well at SciFi conventions. There are patches to Dragon Systems' voice recognition tools (at least for WindowS) to employ the training files from 'Star Trek:

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Thomas David Rivers
Hi Jon, Dave Pitts also has GCC working on MVS (USS, I think) with the Dignus runtime. Or, of course; you could license our tools... http://www.dignus.com - Dave Rivers - That's certainly interesting. I hadn't heard of PDPCLIB or the whole SPFTOOLS stuff before. The

Re: Domino on VM

2006-09-20 Thread Rich Smrcina
I have a customer running Domino on Linux for zSeries under VM. Unfortunately it is only used for outbound email (SMTP) at this time. :( Rich Smrcina VM Assist, Inc. Main: (866)569-7378 Cell: (414)491-6001 Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2007 - Green Bay, WI - Original Message

Install from SuSE Service Pack ISOs

2006-09-20 Thread Scully, William P
This may seem like an odd question, but can you install SuSE Linux from the Service Pack ISOs? I can and do, from the RH Update ISOs. I cannot seem to get a fresh installation (from scratch) when using the ISOs distributed from SuSE as Service Packs. Maybe I'm not supposed to be able to? I'm

Re: PL/I and C cross compilers

2006-09-20 Thread Jon Brock
Sure I could; I'd just have to pay for them out of my own pocket, and it is already shy of everything but lint. Jon snip Or, of course; you could license our tools... http://www.dignus.com /snip -- For LINUX-390 subscribe /

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Ifurung, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One problem I have now is, Yast/YOU does not offer the patch that is supposed to resolve the not uptodate message from Spident -vv command. The patch is available from the patch server, but is not listed when you attempt to do an online update. I have no idea why the patch is not listed so that

Re: Install from SuSE Service Pack ISOs

2006-09-20 Thread Kyle Smith
You need to install base and then service packs on top of them. The SP ISOs are missing a few things that prevent you from doing an install. You can setup a merged install tree using Mike MacIsaac's mksles9root.shscript though which will solve the problem. The script is documented in his

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Adam Thornton
On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:12 AM, David Boyes wrote: About the only thing missing is OSA Express L2 support, AFAIK -- which is really useful to support VSWITCHes. Can Flex do this either, yet? I would assume that since there's now an Open Source QDIO Ethernet driver for Linux, that that gives

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
Jay Maynard wrote: On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:28:13PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: A nice fast 8-way Opteron would probably outrun the average PartnerWorld Flex-ES box, but that's hardly an apples-to-apples comparison. :-) I'd be content to judge their finest against the finest alternative

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread John Summerfield
David Boyes wrote: In such an environment, lack of VM might not matter so much, the virtualisation could be done natively rather than in the emulated environment. Indeed. Simply run multiple copies of Hercules. This only works, of course, as long as you're not doing things that depend on

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Rich Smrcina
Sadly no :( The impression that I get is that even though the driver code is open sourced (for Linux), there is enough of the function still proprietary to prevent Fundamental from making anything useful from it. I keep asking about it and hope is still alive... :) Adam Thornton wrote: On

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Adam Thornton
On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:48 PM, John Summerfield wrote: I don't expect one could run up Adam's 4 virtual Linuxes, but I'd expect one to get more than two or three. Er, those were David's, not mine. Adam -- For LINUX-390

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Troth
Sharing DASD on Hercules should be trivial. Same for Flex-ES. Unless they code against the sharing of the underlying files (eg: with an EXCL open), then simply define multiple disks with the same file. This quickly leads to things like CD-ROM (or just .iso files) as FBA, even IPLable. Linux

Re: Service Pack Display

2006-09-20 Thread Dominic Coulombe
You should log on to the Novell site and download the patch manually. From there, upgrade by using rpm -Fvh yourfile.rpm . On 20-Sep-2006, at 16:11, Ifurung, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One problem I have now is, Yast/YOU does not offer the patch that is supposed to resolve the not uptodate

Re: Getting to 64-bit systems *legitimately*...

2006-09-20 Thread Adam Thornton
On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote: Sadly no :( The impression that I get is that even though the driver code is open sourced (for Linux), there is enough of the function still proprietary to prevent Fundamental from making anything useful from it. I keep asking about it and hope