On Wednesday, 05/28/2008 at 12:37 EDT, Jae-hwa Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thank you for your consideration, Tim.
>
> I need the way for collecting performance data of Linux at z/VM side.
> And it'll be better if I could save the data from z/VM to mysql or
> files on the other Linux server.
>
Thank you for your consideration, Tim.
I need the way for collecting performance data of Linux at z/VM side.
And it'll be better if I could save the data from z/VM to mysql or
files on the other Linux server.
Is it possible to read and get the files from CMS using cmsfs driver
at Linux? I think t
You need to address 3 problems using "native tools" (or any tools for that
matter).
1) Prior to SLES10, the CPU data is VERY WRONG. Easy to prove, and I keep
naively thinking
i don't need to keep reproving this. So you would be using PERL to get bad
data?
2) The overhead is an issue. You
I just read this CMG paper: 'Monitoring Linux with Native Tools' by
Robert Anderson.
If your not a member I believe that the proceedings are publicly
available but you must register.
If not let me know...
Also if your a PERL programmer check out http://www.perfdynamics.com/main.html
Hope this hel
Hi,
Some of our customer have an issue for accumulating their performance
data of Linux servers and z/VM. They wants to get the historical
performance data for Linux and z/VM itself. However the customers
don't have any budgets at the time, and they have only Performance
Toolkit, no other monitori
Yes, RHEL 5 has built in support for PTP. RHEL 4.6 does not support PTP.
Thanks, Terry
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Spann, Elizebeth (Betsie)
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:33 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: FCP Setup
We ra
Hi
Yes, it has been confirmed that RedHat z/Linux 4.6 does not support FCP
PTP Topology at any level of the Kernel.
Thanks for all the responses.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edmund R. MacKenty
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:09 AM
On 5/27/08, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a friend with EMC who is very excited about the new SSD
> subsystems which are beginning to appear. They sound very nice. Being
> "green" and all.
The challenge is lifetime. You can't rewrite flash that often and the
various vendors
On Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 11:38 AM Wayne Driscoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The requirement that a version upgrade requires a full re-install and
then
> copying of the data is one of the big issues I see with bringing Linux
into
> a System z shop and having experienced z folks work on it. Fo
Not yet (bigger fishies to fry).
Little wary of doing so. A "fix" would probably break our /etc/fstab
which is coded without the p's :).
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addr
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcy
Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely agree with that!
>
> There is also what I consider a bug in SLES 9 - if the address ends in a
> A-F as opposed to a 0-9, the "p" is left off. We've coded around it
> where n
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:38 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wayne Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The requirement that a version upgrade requires a full re-install and then
> copying of the data is one of the big issues I see with bringing Linux into
> a System z shop and having ex
Absolutely agree with that!
There is also what I consider a bug in SLES 9 - if the address ends in a
A-F as opposed to a 0-9, the "p" is left off. We've coded around it
where needed. (See 900A-900F below).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/disk/by-path> uname -a
Linux zlinivs1 2.6.5-7.311-s390x #1 SMP Mon
I've noticed that the naming of the devices is very inconsistent. Just
within SuSE SLES 9, I see /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.07ffp1 and
/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.07ff1. And as noted, this is different from SLES
10 which had /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.07ff-part1.
Isn't the point of this to have predic
Good point, thanks.
DJ
- Original Message Follows -
From: Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Searching this archive
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:40:44 -0600
> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:55 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sfargo.com>, Marcy Corte
It can't find the root file system on the 1st boot and you don't get
very far.
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action b
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:14 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcy
Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use /dev/disk/by-path
>
> names to label all of our disks on sles9 rather than the /dev/dasda.. In
> zipl.conf for the root= as well as in /etc/fstab.
>
> Now.. Sles10 has decided
Noproxy would be the .wellsfargo.com stuff - where my installation
server is sitting.
I don't want it to attempt to go through proxy for that. It won't
work.
I do have to go through the proxy to get to nu.novell.com or anything
else on the net for that matter.
Unless I turn off all proxy (PROXY_E
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:55 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcy
Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan,
> Try searching here http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-390@vm.marist.edu/
> instead.
> Seems to work better for me (and faster).
Also, you can use the compressed monthly files at
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:21 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcy
Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * sorry about the digital signature thing on the previous one
>
> If I update /etc/syscongfig/proxy with our proxy server and include
> NO_PROXY = "localhost, wellsfargo.com" , yast2
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:57 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Ext3 (Journaling Filesystems) and BARRIERS =
> Filesystem Integrity
>
[snip]
> The DASD subsystems have o
Patrick Spinler wrote:
How much good would a write barrier do on a linux on z/VM anyway? Would
a barrier message from a linux kernel, through a minidisk and minidisk
cache, through a cp device, to a disk controller, through the
controller's cache preserve a barrier operation? (Please correct th
We ran point-to-point with FCP-attached devices for awhile on RHEL 5
(kernel 2.6.18) on EMC DMX3 hardware. No problem. Never got that
error.
Betsie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edmund R. MacKenty
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 8:09 AM
T
LJ Mace wrote:
What is the patch number??
thanks
Mace
The only reference in Patrick's email to a patch was my quoted email
mention of a SUSE patch within his email.
If this is what you are refering to the it is not a fix, it is in the
base SLES code. Uf you run SLES you have barriers enabled
On Monday 26 May 2008 10:24, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
>Has anyone run into the following error while trying to get FCP to work
>between z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6. We are connecting to a IBM
>DS8100. We present the FCP device to the Linux guest and it sees it. But
>they receive th
Yes it does
Thank you
Mace
--- Patrick Spinler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Carsten Otte wrote:
> | Mark Perry wrote:
> |> I am not sure how many of the people on this list
> subscribe to LWN, but
> |> there was, for me, an eye-opening article o
What is the patch number??
thanks
Mace
--- Patrick Spinler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mark Perry wrote:
> |
> | The Linux Kernel defaults to not using "barriers",
> but SLES has a patch
> | to enable it by default.
>
> Just a couple of though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One last thing occurs to me, and then I'll shut up. Really. :-)
How much good would a write barrier do on a linux on z/VM anyway? Would
a barrier message from a linux kernel, through a minidisk and minidisk
cache, through a cp device, to a disk co
Patrick Spinler wrote:
One other bit of news, for what it's worth, are these:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/126
~ and
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/166
So, for device mapper (e.g. lvm) devices, a solution is in the works.
Well in the works for 2.6.25.
Now the real question is what is in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One other bit of news, for what it's worth, are these:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/126
~ and
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/166
So, for device mapper (e.g. lvm) devices, a solution is in the works.
- -- Pat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Perry wrote:
|
| The Linux Kernel defaults to not using "barriers", but SLES has a patch
| to enable it by default.
Just a couple of thoughts, and information from the article.
Note the default above is a filesystem flag. You can turn this on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Otte wrote:
| Mark Perry wrote:
|> I am not sure how many of the people on this list subscribe to LWN, but
|> there was, for me, an eye-opening article on "Barriers and journaling
|> filesystems": http://lwn.net/Articles/283161/
|
| Thank you
Mary Anne,
You'd think dump space would be related to storage in use but we have a
minor problem in VM5.2 where not using our central storage frequently
enough causes CP to allocate larger dump areas. Maybe it'll improve in
VM 5.3.
Back in 2006 IBM support told us-
"Another thought is that this s
Ah, thanks John. One has 73485, the other 468941. I guess it allocates dump
space based on, usage or something? Setting dump off shows a spool usage of
1%.
Mary Anne
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Romanowski, John (OFT) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do CP Q DUMP
> and see if the pages set asid
do CP Q DUMP
and see if the pages set aside for a dump file account for the spool
discrepancy.
q dump
DASD 2213 dump unit CP IPL pages 182601
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, pr
Hello all. I have two VM LPARs, each with a mod9 spool. One is at 4%
utilization and one is at 26%. I have run SFPURGER and
perfkit option 7 shows nothing major on either. Both have several NSS's that
are the largest according to perfkit. Q RDR OPERATNS shows
no records for dumps. There are a few o
Mark Perry wrote:
I am not sure how many of the people on this list subscribe to LWN, but
there was, for me, an eye-opening article on "Barriers and journaling
filesystems": http://lwn.net/Articles/283161/
Thank you Mark, great article. It'll be available public in one week
for those who don't s
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 09:16:02PM -0400, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone run into the following error while trying to get FCP to work
> between z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6. We are connecting to a IBM
> DS8100. We present the FCP device to the Linux guest and it
38 matches
Mail list logo
