Colleagues,
Does anybody know is it possible to create vswitch which will be
unaware to access permissions, so every guest can connect to it and I
don't need to run modify vswitch grant access every time?
Thank You in advance.
--
With best regards,
Andrew
Hi Marcy,
If you are using the lin_tape driver and udev you can use static naming by
using /dev/lin_tape/by-id/wwpn-IBMtape. I am not quite sure about the old
IBMtape driver, but if you are using that one it is about time to move to
lin_tape anyway.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
2009/4/15 Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com:
You can define a Guest LAN as UNRESTRICTED but not a VSWITCH. But when
you use an external security manager, you could create resource
profiles that do not restrict you. Whether that is a wise approach
depends very much on your configuration and
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:52:18 +0200
Ivan Warren i...@vmfacility.fr wrote:
Daniel Jarboe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
SLES11 was checking the CPU Model, not liking 9672, and aborting. I changed
CPUMODEL to something more current (2096) and the SLES11
Good day,
We are trying to print using CUPS on z/LINUX SLES10-SP2, however noticed
that it does not recognise the ANSI Defined Printer Control Characters
(ie a 1 in column 1 will Skip to line 1 on new page or a - in column 1
will space 3 lines, etc.)
I have used Redbook paper on Printing
Does anybody know is it possible to create vswitch which will be
unaware to access permissions, so every guest can connect to it and I
don't need to run modify vswitch grant access every time?
I don't think so. Anyway I don't think you want a vswitch that is access
permission unaware. More
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Avramenko l...@volgograd.ru wrote:
Does anybody know is it possible to create vswitch which will be
unaware to access permissions, so every guest can connect to it and I
don't need to run modify vswitch grant access every time?
You can define a Guest
(Cross posted to MVMRUG, IBMVM and Linux-390 lists)
Please make plans to attend the next Midwest VM Regional User Group
(MVMRUG) meeting on April 24th in the IBM offices on Rings Road in
Dublin (Columbus), OH. A complete agenda will be posted soon, but we
currently have Tracy Dean of IBM and
Heiko Carstens wrote:
How about the patch below?
Since I would expect that this is going to happen a lot of times as
soon as some distro starts to compile the kernel with e.g. only z9-109
and higher support we indeed need a magic number here.
Otherwise we can't tell immediately what's going
There is also the method described in this post on the IBMVM mailing
list: http://www.mail-archive.com/ib...@listserv.uark.edu/msg16259.html
It describes one way if you don't have an ESM (which is really the best way.)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Avramenko l...@volgograd.ru wrote:
Hi John,
UNIT=CTC should be correct, see pages 41 42 in
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245669.pdf
With kind regards
Thorsten Diehl
System Test Linux on System z
IBM Deutschland Research Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Erich
Thank you!
We are using lin_tape and udev so these /dev/lin_tape do exist.
Thanks!
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action
On 4/15/09 5:49 AM, Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
How about the patch below?
Since I would expect that this is going to happen a lot of times as
soon as some distro starts to compile the kernel with e.g. only z9-109
and higher support we indeed need a magic number here.
You need to specify a filter that processes ANSI formatting. Try -f on the lpr
command.
You can define sets of CUPS options and use them similar to a form code, but
AFAIK, there isn't a autodetect for rotation. You could easily write one as a
filter; the CUPS code provides sufficient exits to
Not STSI but STFL (to see if STFLE is available) and then STFLE to find what
facilities the processor has.
On 4/15/09 9:55 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote:
If I remember, the response from STSI should give you whether a specific set
of capabilities is present, and then you don't
On 4/15/09 10:01 AM, Neale Ferguson ne...@sinenomine.net wrote:
Not STSI but STFL (to see if STFLE is available) and then STFLE to find what
facilities the processor has.
Good catch. I have a older copy of the POP on my desk; time to upgrade...8-)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:55:08 -0400
David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote:
On 4/15/09 5:49 AM, Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
How about the patch below?
Since I would expect that this is going to happen a lot of times as
soon as some distro starts to compile the kernel
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:55:08 -0400
David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote:
On 4/15/09 5:49 AM, Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
How about the patch below?
Since I would expect that this is going to happen a lot of times as
soon as some distro starts to compile the kernel
On Wednesday, 04/15/2009 at 11:00 EDT, Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I agree that it would be better to emit a message to the console. But
the code that emits the message must be written completely in assembler
to prevent the compiler from generating instructions that
Alan Altmark wrote:
There is no need for heroic measures to write a nice message to the
console. Just make sure that the addresses in the PSW are unique for each
condition. If you can be clever in your use of letters A-F and numbers
(and l33t5peak), you can give informative wait state codes.
java -version
java version 1.6.0_0
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.4.1) (build 1.6.0_0-b14)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Core VM (build 14.0-b08, interpreted mode)
-- System
Properties---
java.runtime.name : OpenJDK
David,
Is Java without a JIT compiler really of much practical use?
IBM has made a huge investment in JIT technology for z architecture
(z/OS and Linux) in their SDK. It would be much better IMO if IBM
offered a Solaris z port of their SDK. After all, if IBM isn't
interested in Solaris z
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:44:21 -0500
Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
David,
Is Java without a JIT compiler really of much practical use?
In a memory constrained environment a JIT is frequently a lose. There are
in fact lots of cases where straight interpreting is better. It is also
of course
SUSE LINUX ENTERPRISE SERVER DEPLOYMENT APPROACH GUIDE
This document is intended for IT professionals and managers who are
considering deploying SUSE Linux Enterprise Server. Novell has had a number
of requests from customers looking for help specifically in moving from Red
Hat Enterprise Linux
24 matches
Mail list logo
