Any chance VMRM was active and too storage away?
Mark Perry wrote:
Hi Ron,
thats a support question if ever I heard one. Contact SAP/IBM. (Which of
course will lead to a question on maintenace levels of linux and sap.)
If kill -9 doesn't work then the process is in a system routine that can be
Hi Ron,
thats a support question if ever I heard one. Contact SAP/IBM. (Which of
course will lead to a question on maintenace levels of linux and sap.)
If kill -9 doesn't work then the process is in a system routine that can be
cancelled.
Are you saying that shutdown didn't work either and that yo
Hello,
I just had to #CP logoff on of our production SAP systems. It had a SAP
process on it with a process state of "D" interruptible sleep.
The sap cancel options would not work.
kill would not work.
kill -9 would not work on it.
Any ideas on how to avoid having to log off next time.
Ron
>>> On 4/5/2010 at 09:50 AM, Christian Paro wrote:
-snip-
> Does anyone on this list know:
>
> 1) Why this changed between SLES 10 and SLES 11?
It seems as though it's a feature of the new kernel and new udev. The kernel
is generating the uevents to add the dm-? device(s), udev is acting on
I use the carrot ^ (above the number 6) followed by a capital C: ^C for
Ctrl-c on the 3270 console.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Clovis
Pereira
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 4:27 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
I've noticed that, when a disk (or set of disks) containing the physical
extents underlying an LVM volume group is set online with `chccwdev -e`
under SLES 11, that volume group is also automatically activated - setting
the "open count" for those disks to "2" and preventing such operations as a
non
