Re: deterse

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Leyva
code looks like you had some sort of problem. Why it's not being more verbose about it, I don't know. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: deterse Hi all, im asking

Re: OT: deterse

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Leyva
] / www.novipro.com Alex Leyva [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-20 12:16 Please respond to Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject OT: deterse Hi all, im asking this here because i cant find info anywhere, so excuse me, im

Re: OT: deterse

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Leyva
i've redefine from 64m to 512m and still the same On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Adam Thornton wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 13:57, Alex Leyva wrote: Thanks, that solved the problem, but now i receive: deterse VLST5465 bin e VLST5465 servlink e No traceback - not enough CTL storage At a guess

Re: OT: deterse

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Leyva
im ussing a dedicated 3390-3, its ussing 338 blocks (1%), and terse cmsut1 seems to be like a portion of the untersed file. thanks On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Mark D Pace wrote: Typically when you have a CMSUT1 it means you ran out of space while writing a file. Possibly you don't have enough

Re: OT: deterse

2003-08-20 Thread Alex Leyva
i think that i've found the problem, im downloading from ibm ftp to a linux, and then to the vm, but when i download it to linux i dont set f 1024, please excuse me :-( thanks for all On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Adam Thornton wrote: On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 13:57, Alex Leyva wrote: Thanks, that solved

OT: jdbc with db2 v4.1

2003-08-14 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, i know this is completly off topic, but i think that maybe here could help me, we want to know if db2 v4.1 have support for jdbc, and where to find info about it. Thanks. -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico (Administracisn de Mainframe).

Virtual machinnes freeze

2003-08-14 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, today we experienced some strange behavior with our vm, we have 12 linux virtual machinnes running, tcpip, and monwrite, the problem is that suddendly one linux vm freeze without reasson, with low cpu utilization (0-10%), no pagging, no load, it just freeze, when we acces trough vm console

Re: esql/c

2003-08-01 Thread Alex Leyva
Jim, where could i download it free? thanks On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: im looking for the Informix ESQL/C, its part of the Informix Client SDK but i cant find it for linux390, i found it for intel linux, aix, sco, etc, but not for linux zseries. Alex: I think what you are

Re: Where are your databases?

2003-07-31 Thread Alex Leyva
we have a similar project, actually we have two lpars with os/390 and db2, and we plan to migrate the db's to linux390 maybe with postresql. On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Rich Smrcina wrote: I have a customer doing just that (Linux for S/390 as the database server). So much so that moving off of DB2 on

cyls vs bytes

2003-07-30 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, i have some questions about disk space and i think that this is the right place to ask: -how much bytes are 1 cyl? -how could i calculate the cyls needed to have x mb for swap and for disk space formmated with ext2 and 3? thanks -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad

large volume support

2003-07-23 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, did somebody is using large volume support with linux 390? is it recommended to use it with z/vm with volumes of 32760 cyl? how do i enable it on z/vm 4.3? thanks -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico (Administracisn de Mainframe). Direccisn

Re: esql/c

2003-07-14 Thread Alex Leyva
Jim, thats right, is there any way to get it free? thanks for all Jim On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: im looking for the Informix ESQL/C, its part of the Informix Client SDK but i cant find it for linux390, i found it for intel linux, aix, sco, etc, but not for linux zseries.

Re: esql/c

2003-07-01 Thread Alex Leyva
Jim, thats right, is there any way to get it free? thanks for all Jim On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: im looking for the Informix ESQL/C, its part of the Informix Client SDK but i cant find it for linux390, i found it for intel linux, aix, sco, etc, but not for linux zseries.

esql/c

2003-06-24 Thread Alex Leyva
hi all, we are planning to migrate some systems that actually are running on linux (intel) to linux390, the problem is that the db is informix, and the programs need the driver, the info about it: ESQL/C versions from 7.2x on should be OK. ESQL/C is now part of the Informix Client SDK. somebody

Re: esql/c

2003-06-24 Thread Alex Leyva
Jim: im looking for the Informix ESQL/C, its part of the Informix Client SDK, but i cant find it for linux390, i found it for intel linux, aix, sco, etc, but not for linux zseries. thanks. On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: hi all, we are planning to migrate some systems that actually

Re: Problem IPLing new 2.4.19 kernel

2003-03-19 Thread Alex Leyva
I has the same problem, in my case its because the 2.4.19 kernel doesnt use the devices at /dev/dasdxxx, instead i have /dev/dasd//, where is the address of the device, into the directory i have: # ls /dev/dasd/0200/ device disc part1 Device Drivers and Installation Commands have more

OSA mode and lost packets

2003-03-13 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, im again here with problems... i've configured a linux with the OSA-Express dedicated to it, using the qdio mode, and its running ok, i've defined a virtual nic to the same linux, and created a guest lan, then, i brought up another linux, defined a virtual nic in the same guest lan, both

Re: OSA mode and lost packets (solved)

2003-03-13 Thread Alex Leyva
] Behalf Of Alex Leyva Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSA mode and lost packets Hi all, im again here with problems... i've configured a linux with the OSA-Express dedicated to it, using the qdio mode, and its running ok, i've defined

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-12 Thread Alex Leyva
/s390/qeth.o -insmod qeth and got it putting alias eth0 qeth in /etc/modules.conf doesnt helped me, i dont know why, but insmod works :) thanks for all the help On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Vic Cross wrote: On 12.03.2003 at 10:54:26, Alex Leyva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used the qeth.o

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-12 Thread Alex Leyva
/kernel/net/ipv6/ipv6.o \ /lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/drivers/s390/qdio.o thanks On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Vic Cross wrote: On 12.03.2003 at 10:54:26, Alex Leyva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used the qeth.o module that Adam send to me, and activated the ipv6, and now its working, but i have

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-12 Thread Alex Leyva
: Alejandro, Try doing a depmod -a command. That should fix things for you. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: QDIO for virtual NIC i know where

QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, im configuring some guest lans, but im having problems with the linux side, im using RedHat 7.2, with kernel 2.4.19, i've compiled the kernel to have QDIO as a module, but i have only the qdio.o module, i dont have qeth.o, i have the definitions in modules.conf and chandev.conf correct,

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
the stock qeth? from suse? or where i get it? when i builded the kernel it only made the qdio.o module, i dont have any qeth.o, thats the problem. On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Adam Thornton wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:45:50PM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote: Alejandro, You need to download the

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
version 2.4.9-37 (OCOs dated 2002-08-16) kernel version 2.4.9-17 (OCOs dated 2002-01-15) so what can i do? On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Adam Thornton wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:32:02PM -0600, Alex Leyva wrote: Hi all, im configuring some guest lans, but im having problems with the linux side

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Adam Thornton wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:01:20PM -0600, Alex Leyva wrote: the stock qeth? from suse? or where i get it? when i builded the kernel it only made the qdio.o module, i dont have any qeth.o, thats the problem. Oh dear. Has Red Hat gone and done

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
reference errors. Post those errors, and someone should be able to help you figure out what to turn on or off in your kernel config. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: QDIO

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
, and someone should be able to help you figure out what to turn on or off in your kernel config. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: QDIO for virtual NIC i've tried with almost

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
im going to rebuild the kernel. On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote: Try turning on IPV6 support in your kernel. I believe you can make it a module as well, so you should just be able to modprobe it in. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
module that matches. http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/special_oco _rh_2.4.shtml Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 5:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QDIO for virtual NIC Hi

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
could you please post me the full process? i buided too gcc, glibc, modutils, binutils, but it seems that i did something wrong, because i dont get the recent versions, did you upgraded it too? i would really appreciate it. On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Vic Cross wrote: Alex, the kernel modules marked

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 00:05, Adam Thornton wrote: On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 05:01:20PM -0600, Alex Leyva wrote: the stock qeth? from suse? or where i get it? when i builded the kernel it only made the qdio.o module, i dont have any qeth.o, thats the problem

Re: QDIO for virtual NIC

2003-03-11 Thread Alex Leyva
dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi ) (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda ) -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Leyva Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LINUX-390

Network topology for linux farm

2003-03-10 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, we are in the planning stage for consolidate some of our linux servers into our z800, specifically we will start with our dns and mail server, but we still cant find what topology we will use, the basic idea we have is to use a linux guest with the osa DEDICATEd to it, and on the other

Re: Network topology for linux farm

2003-03-10 Thread Alex Leyva
- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network topology for linux farm Hi all, we are in the planning stage for consolidate some of our linux servers into our z800, specifically we will start with our dns

Upgrade to 2.4.19

2003-03-10 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, i have installed Redhat 7.2 as a vm guest, it comes with kernel 2.4.9, so i've downloaded the following: binutils-2.12.90.0.15 gcc-3.2 glibc-2.2.5 modutils-2.4.7 linux-2.4.19 and the following patches: binutils-2.12.90.0.15-s390-may2002.tar.gz glibc-2.2.5-s390-1-may2002.tar.gz

OT: files in reader spool

2003-02-18 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, i have a simple question, again. All the files that i have on the reader spool are the history of the sessions? can i purge all the files without watching the contents? is there a quicker form than receive next x dat, filel * dat and so? thanks a lot (im really new to zvm) -- Alejandro

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
, MN 55905 Codito, Ergo Sum In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different. -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: and the time went from 1m3.6s to 1m2.039s in the better case, the people from ibm (they are here yet) can give me an answer about the poor performance (i consider that its a poor performance, because a intel piii 128Mb RAM make the tar in about

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Boyes wrote: The memory we've alocated is really 256Mb, the reason for the 1gb is because the guys from ibm told that maybe that was the problem. That's bad advice. For Linux in virtual machines, smaller is better. It's better to have Linux page to VDISK -- CP

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Boyes wrote: I've heard about vector facilities, i really dont know much about it, only that they are designed to provide help with arithmetic operations, and things like that, maybe that could help with cpu bound task? Not really. They no longer exist on

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
. And last, I think that I would remove the absolute settings that Linux has and let the VM scheduler/dispatcher do their marvelous work. I would do each of the above as separate steps and evaluate each after completion. :)) -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto

Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Boyes wrote: Another test we ran yesterday where to tar (WITHOUT gzip, only tar) 100 Mb, we ran the test about 30 times, without modifing the enviroment, the 70-80% times we get about 1.4s, but 20-30% times the time vary from 2s to 8s, without any reason,

x3270 again

2003-02-14 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, i still cant resolve the problem with the consoles and x3270, the people from ibm request me the information about the people that are using it, basically they want the version and the command they use to call x3270, please, could them can send me those info? i would really appreciate it.

URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-13 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, i have a problem, we have a z800, the configuration is: 1 cp 80 MIPS 1 IFL 8 Gb storage 3 partitions: -os/390 2.6 -os/390 2.6 -z/vm 4.3 840 gb (shark) the cp is dedicated to both os/390, and the ifl to z/vm, 2gb to both os/390, and 6 gb to z/vm. Redhat 7.2 as a

lvm (another question)

2003-02-11 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, i have a simple question about lvm: if i create one volume, with two 3390-3, for example, i could use the volume with other linux (other image) ? thanks -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico (Administracisn de Mainframe). Direccisn General de

Re: lvm (another question), now RedHat 7.2

2003-02-11 Thread Alex Leyva
? thanks On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Post, Mark K wrote: LVM is not something you would want to share with other systems directly. That was not the design. If you want to share with other systems, use GFS, AFS, NFS, etc. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Free IBM Linux Seminar

2003-02-11 Thread Alex Leyva
In Mexico its worse, they never come :( On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gregg C Levine wrote: Hello again from Gregg C Levine Or in NYC. I mean, its too bad they don t have a show in NYC. --- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lvm (another question), now RedHat 7.2

2003-02-11 Thread Alex Leyva
you'll find that you won't need 80% of what is included in the everything setup. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lvm (another question), now RedHat 7.2 I've asked

Re: tn3270e

2003-02-03 Thread Alex Leyva
-01-03, Alex Leyva wrote: the device number is correct and everything else, so im really confused :( Doesn't x3270 default to some funny model number like 3270-4 ? That may be confusing things if it started with 24 x 80. Rob -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de

Redhat 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, s390, s390x?

2003-01-28 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi all, im downloading Redhat 7.1, but now im not sure about the 64 or 31 bits, im downloading it from: ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.1/en/os/s390x/, in the 7.2 directory i only found s390, and looking at the mirror list (http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html) i see that the directory is

Re: Redhat 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, s390, s390x?

2003-01-28 Thread Alex Leyva
Jim: But what will happen when the applications will need 64 bits? how dificult the migration will be? thanks On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jim Elliott wrote: Hi all, im downloading Redhat 7.1, but now im not sure about the 64 or 31 bits, im downloading it from: ... Alex: I would recommend you

Re: tn3270e

2003-01-23 Thread Alex Leyva
Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 00:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tn3270e On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Alex Leyva wrote: Hi, we have just installed our new z800, we are using one 2074 to get the consoles, but we have one problem, we want to use linux

Re: tn3270e

2003-01-23 Thread Alex Leyva
in fact x3270 start with 3270-4 80x43by default, but when i change it to 80x24 (model 2) i get the same error. On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Rob van der Heij wrote: At 20:48 23-01-03, Alex Leyva wrote: the device number is correct and everything else, so im really confused :( Doesn't x3270 default

tn3270e

2003-01-22 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, we have just installed our new z800, we are using one 2074 to get the consoles, but we have one problem, we want to use linux but we cant find a tn3270e emulator, we try to use x3270 but obviusly it get an unknown error when we try to connect to the 2074, is there any tn3270e for linux or we

postgres

2002-10-09 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, we are working on a goverment developement, to migrate an Multiprise 2003 with OS/390 2.6 (and DB2) to a z800 with z/vm and linux, actually we dont know what DB we will use, we have two options: DB2 and postgres, obviously we want to use postgres, but we need some help to make the

Re: Determining the 'mass' of a file system tree.

2002-09-17 Thread Alex Leyva
There is du, it can tell you how much space is using any directory. man du or info du. On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, James Melin wrote: Is there a good tool to say analyze part of a file system tree and report how much space it is using? Say like /usr/sbin - which is not in it's own file system

linux distributions for s/390

2002-08-15 Thread Alex Leyva
Hi, We are planning a migration from a Multiprise 2003-225 with os/390 2.6 to a z800 with linux, actually we dont know what distribution we will use, i dont want to initiate a long discussion, i only want to hear some opinions, also, i know there is Debian, Red Hat, Suse, Turbo Linux, and