Re: Hipersockets and Linux...

Yes, that did the trick. Thanks for the solution with such details! Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Vic Cross Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 9:43 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets

Re: Hipersockets and Linux...

Frank wrote: >Okay, following along in "IBM HiperSockets Implementation Guide" >Chapter 3 "Software configurations for HiperSockets. The command >"ifconfig enccw0.0.0800 192.168.250.88 netmask 255.255.255.0 up" >seems to work, only temporarily. > >#

Hipersockets and Linux...

...specifically Clef (CentOS) 7.8. Adding hipersockets to a zLinux instance. Okay, following along in "IBM HiperSockets Implementation Guide" Chapter 3 "Software configurations for HiperSockets. The command "ifconfig enccw0.0.0800 192.168.250.88 netmask 255.255.255.0 up&

Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4 >>> On 2/5/2019 at 05:00 PM, Marco Banuelos wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made > a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the > customer w

Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

>>> On 2/6/2019 at 05:10 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: > On Wednesday, 02/06/2019 at 09:56 GMT, Mark Post wrote: > >> How did you connect the HiperSocket to the guest? Did you ATTACH the > devices >> to the guest? Did you DEDICATE them in the CP directory? If the > latter, >> you'll need to

Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

>>> On 2/5/2019 at 05:00 PM, Marco Banuelos wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made > a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the > customer want's to switch from OSA to Hipersocket and the HiperSocket network

Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

Marco, It sounds like the hipersockets connection has not been made visible to the Linux guest in the z/VM directory. Please verify with your z/VM administrator that the hipersockets connection has been defined (and that there is some other guest on that same hipersocket connection so you can

Re: Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

Marco I have Hipersockets with Suse 15 and Ubuntu 18 running in lpar no z/VM on a zBC12 Sent from MI A2 On Feb. 5, 2019 10:54 p.m., Marco Banuelos wrote: Hi all, I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA

Problem with Hipersockets z13 SUSE 12 Sp4

Hi all, I'm experiencing some problems with SLES 12 SP4 running on z/vm 7.1, I made a SLES 12 SP4 installation and I configured with OSA network, now the customer want's to switch from OSA to Hipersocket and the HiperSocket network it's not showed on the SLES 12 SP4 vm, I rebooted the vm, I

Re: ClefOS setting up guest LAN for HiperSockets

Cornelia - thank you for your reply. I am working from the Redbook: Virtualization Cookbook ... Volume 1 and am finding typos in it. In this case the cio_ignore command was botched up and included in the description before a set of steps to configure hipersockets on RH. it should have been step

Re: ClefOS setting up guest LAN for HiperSockets

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:38:44 -0500 Phillip Gramly wrote: I'm seconding the suggestion of using chzdev, but some additional notes from me: > # vmcp q v 204-206 > OSA  0204 ON NIC  0204  UNIT 000 SUBCHANNEL = 0001 >  0204 DEVTYPE HIPER   VIRTUAL CHPID 01 IQD >  0204 MAC

Re: ClefOS setting up guest LAN for HiperSockets

The chzdev command also simplifies things. It's part of s390utils-base. On 7/14/18, 06:38, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of R P Herrold" wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Phillip Gramly wrote: > # echo 0.0.204,0.0.205,0.0.206 > /sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/qeth/group > -bash: echo:

ClefOS setting up guest LAN for HiperSockets

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Phillip Gramly wrote: > # echo 0.0.204,0.0.205,0.0.206 > /sys/bus/ccwgroup/drivers/qeth/group > -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument > > I'm missing something somewhere. can anybody help me? Hi, Phillip, Thanks for using ClefOS 1. This is just my OCD talking, but I

ClefOS setting up guest LAN for HiperSockets

I have my ClefOS system up which i initially brought up connected to our VSWITCH (this is under zVM 6.3)              i want to set up Hipersockets using a guest LAN. i used : CP DEFINE LAN ZVTSMLAN OWNERID SYSTEM TYPE HIPER IP MFS 64K and was able to connect to it from a VSE system. Now i am

Re: hipersockets

On Friday, 11/20/2015 at 02:28 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk <gpowiedz...@gmail.com> wrote: > ohhh I see what you are saying (I think so). > > I was thinking about standard usage of vswitch bridge so a scenario where > all guests have real dedicated hipersockets a

Re: hipersockets

On Friday, 11/20/2015 at 02:02 GMT, David Kreuter wrote: > Another advantage is that it uses only one hipersocket triplet whereas > dedicated hipersocket will end up using one triplet per Linux virtual. > You can even use the same hiper triplet on each LPAR. > There is

Re: hipersockets

LPAR. There is a limit to how many LPARs can connect to the hiper. I've been scalded by this a few times. David Original Message Subject: Re: hipersockets From: Grzegorz Powiedziuk <gpowiedz...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, November 20, 2015 8:47 am To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU

Re: hipersockets

ohhh I see what you are saying (I think so). I was thinking about standard usage of vswitch bridge so a scenario where all guests have real dedicated hipersockets and vswitch has one of these hipersockets as well. This gives hipersocket virtual machines a way to talk to each other (via

Re: hipersockets

ught about doing vswitch but then AFIK I would end up with with > > virtual hipersockets on linux guest. > > Linux guests can use real HiperSockets with the HiperSocket VSWITCH bridge > on z/VM. Their traffic will automatically be bridged to a physical LAN > that can be accessed by z/

hipersockets

I am planning to use hipersockets for internal communication between oracle nodes in each RAC cluster (oracle nodes run in different lpars). I've never used real hipersockets before so I am no sure if I understand this correctly. >From what I've learned so far, In order to achieve this, we n

Re: hipersockets

be as fast as hipersocket but it doesn't go far out of the box either. David Kreuter Original Message Subject: Re: hipersockets From: Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, November 19, 2015 3:05 pm To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 07:

Re: hipersockets

a > > shared chpid between LPARS. Hipersockets on the same chpid can > communicate > > with each other. > > Hosts using the same VLAN on the same HiperSocket chpid can talk to each > other. There are no controls on the VLAN ID that a host is permitted to > use, so from

Re: hipersockets

On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 07:38 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk <gpowiedz...@gmail.com> wrote: > From what I've learned so far, In order to achieve this, we need to have a > shared chpid between LPARS. Hipersockets on the same chpid can communicate > with each other. Hosts usin

Re: hipersockets

Thanks David. I thought about doing vswitch but then AFIK I would end up with with virtual hipersockets on linux guest. And I've read in IBMs redbook for oracle 12: IBM HiperSockets™ are certified and supported for the private network. Only a network that is configured with *real* HiperSockets

Re: hipersockets

On Thursday, 11/19/2015 at 08:35 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk <gpowiedz...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about doing vswitch but then AFIK I would end up with with > virtual hipersockets on linux guest. Linux guests can use real HiperSockets with the HiperSocket VSWITCH bri

Re: Hipersockets Early Completion Queue Support

On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 17:26 +, Gerard Howells wrote: Hello All, As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM 6.2 with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES 10 SP4 and 11 SP3 guests. I

Hipersockets Early Completion Queue Support

Hello All, As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM 6.2 with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES 10 SP4 and 11 SP3 guests. I know that it's supported in SLES 11 my question is whether it's

Re: Hipersockets Early Completion Queue Support

On 5/29/2014 at 01:26 PM, Gerard Howells ghowe...@americafirst.com wrote: As a result of some issues we've been seeing we're looking to implement the z/VM Hipersockets Early Completion queue feature in our systems. We run VM 6.2 with z/VSE 5.1 and a mixture of SLES 10 SP4 and 11 SP3 guests

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Hi Offer, All IPtables are off, both for v4 and v6. Pinging from z/OS to zLinux does not work, nor does traceroute yield anything. With all this said, I think it has something to do with the way I have routing set up on the z/OS side. For all OSA traffic, I use OSPF while for Hipersockets, I

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

. Pinging from z/OS to zLinux does not work, nor does traceroute yield anything. With all this said, I think it has something to do with the way I have routing set up on the z/OS side. For all OSA traffic, I use OSPF while for Hipersockets, I use static routing. - The reason I think this is because

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS Hi You might be correct and this is a sourcevipa issue but i cant tell as i am lacking some data... Not many know this but the order of the home statment matters... you must place your hiper sockets interface before your

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

://www.dclibrary.ideascale.com -Original Message- From: Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor) Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:01 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: RE: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS Offer, I have a test system... let me give it a shot. Right now, I know for a fact that my HS Home IP address

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Offer, It does work... why on earth? I see from a packet trace that anything going to a Hipersockets address (5.5.5.0) has a source IP address of 5.5.5.x, while anything going out normal OSAD, leaves with the VIPA address. What is with the HOME statement? I recall from OS390 TCPIP

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

to a Hipersockets address (5.5.5.0) has a source IP address of 5.5.5.x, while anything going out normal OSAD, leaves with the VIPA address. What is with the HOME statement? I recall from OS390 TCPIP that the order made a difference, but I don't recall why? David Diep What would you like to see

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

12:54 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS First of all i am glad to here it works... The home statment order only matters with vipa addresses... The way it works is all addresses after the vipa are sourced by it if the sourcevipa parameter is specified

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

On Nov 1, 2013 7:06 PM, Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor) david.d...@dc.gov wrote: Hi Everyone, I got a good one (I think)... did I imagine this working at one point? I am not able to connect from my z/OS Hipersockets to my RHEL6.2 Hipersockets. I am able to successfully initiate a connection

Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Hi Everyone, I got a good one (I think)... did I imagine this working at one point? I am not able to connect from my z/OS Hipersockets to my RHEL6.2 Hipersockets. I am able to successfully initiate a connection from my RHEL6.2 Hipersockets to my z/OS Hipersockets. I am able

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

What is the message that is telling you that you can not connect to your z/OS hipersocket? Regards, J.B. Mills III Solutions Architect 1515 Poydras Street Suite 1925 New Orleans, LA. 70112 Cell 614-226-0284 jmil...@us.ibm.com The only difference between a good day and a bad day, is your

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Mills III Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:43 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS What is the message that is telling you that you can not connect to your z/OS hipersocket? Regards, J.B. Mills III Solutions Architect 1515 Poydras Street Suite 1925

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Is the request going out your default route as opposed to the hipersocket? -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor) Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 2:02 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

Emmit, That could very well be the case... I did not define a specific route for Hipersockets in RHEL (always wondered about that). As for my z/OS, I use OSPF for routing, but static routes for Hipersockets traffic. ; DEVICE IUTIQDED MPCIPA

Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS

, November 01, 2013 2:19 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets between RHEL and z/OS Emmit, That could very well be the case... I did not define a specific route for Hipersockets in RHEL (always wondered about that). As for my z/OS, I use OSPF for routing, but static routes

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

[mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:34 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet? -Original Message- From: Chase, John [ snip ] Now, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

, February 27, 2013 1:34 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet? -Original Message- From: Chase, John [ snip ] Now, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file on our golden image is the statement: OPTIONS=layer2=0 portno=0 I

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

the penguin that doesn't talk while he was trying to figure out Hipersockets. I also notice the golden copy has BOOTPROTO=static instead of none. I'll set both back to golden and see what happens. And that fixed that problem. We now have both interfaces working, but the hipersockets network appears

Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

Hi, All, We're just getting started with Linux (RHEL6.3) on z/VM (6.2, non-SSI). We generally followed the Virtualization Cookbook published by Mike MacIsaac and others at IBM, and got our first RHEL web server up and running. Then we tried to define a Hipersockets network (this server

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

On 2/26/2013 at 04:48 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote: How do we configure Linux so that both interfaces (eth0 and hsi0) are configured at startup time? Look at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 to see what is in there for ONBOOT. For the interface to be started

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

of the hipersockets virtual devices (but after the guest is started, ifconfig shows only the hipersockets interface as active). Here's the VM logon of the guest: LOGON AT 15:40:29 CST TUESDAY 02/26/13 Command complete

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

On 2/26/2013 at 06:08 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote: -snip- Tried an interactive IPL and startup of the Linux vm, and saw some error messages that indicate we've got some misteaks [sic] in the definitions of the hipersockets virtual devices (but after the guest is started

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

How are 7000-7002 defined? Seeing the directory entry would be useful too. An error is happening before the ipl moment.  David Kreuter Original message From: Mark Post mp...@suse.com Date: To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet? On 2/26

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

: OPTIONS=layer2=0 portno=0 I don't know why that statement is missing, unless our network guy deleted it from the penguin that doesn't talk while he was trying to figure out Hipersockets. I also notice the golden copy has BOOTPROTO=static instead of none. I'll set both back to golden and see

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

, what's missing from this file that is present in the same file on our golden image is the statement: OPTIONS=layer2=0 portno=0 I don't know why that statement is missing, unless our network guy deleted it from the penguin that doesn't talk while he was trying to figure out Hipersockets. I

Re: Hipersockets broke Ethernet?

-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Lee Stewart RHEL has an error where if you use system-config-network on a layer 2 interface it forgets that it was layer 2. Reported a year ago as Bug 809534 - system-config-network ignores option field. No fix. Did you

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

of those *real* hipersockets. (haven't we been here before ... ;-) The ephemeral energy-to-matter converter modules are already included at no additional charge. ;-) Alan Altmark Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant IBM System Lab Services and Training ibm.com/systems/services/labservices

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

I guess my main drive to use a common guest LAN was to avoid having to assign a unique device set for each zLinux guest by specifying a SPECIAL definition in each. The main use for the Hipersocket connections would be to run zLinux backup/restore processing based on the MVS platform, and I

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

there is a misunderstanding. I have no objection to real HiperSockets for backups (or any other reason) as long as you realize that HiperSockets consume z CPU cycles since it is the CPU that moves the data, not the IOPs. If I make it simple and define unique devices to each user, how do I fail over

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote: Perhaps there is a misunderstanding. I have no objection to real HiperSockets for backups (or any other reason) as long as you realize that HiperSockets consume z CPU cycles since it is the CPU that moves the data

Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

I'm not able to get any response back to my zlinux guest over a guest LAN I've set up for Hipersocket connections. I've defined IP/ADDR 5.1.1.1 as a VM home address, 5.1.1.3 as the MVS home and set up the Linux guest as 5.1.2.10. A static route for 5.1.2.0/24 has been defined under MVS to point

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 04:59:49PM +, Norris, Chet wrote: I've defined IP/ADDR 5.1.1.1 as a VM home address, 5.1.1.3 as the MVS home and set up the Linux guest as 5.1.2.10. It would be preferable if you could use RFC 1918 allocations for your legacy IP interconnections. Just using random IP

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

, and visa versa. Any ideas? Yes, your network diagram is messed up. Your picture is Linux [Guest LAN] TCPIP [HiperSockets] MVS TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one virtual (to Linux). So TCPIP will need two HiperSocket interfaces, each with it's own IP

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

On 7/16/2012 at 04:37 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote: TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one virtual (to Linux). So TCPIP will need two HiperSocket interfaces, each with it's own IP address in each of the two networks. You have the real

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

On Monday, 07/16/2012 at 09:44 EDT, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote: Alternatively, he could just attach a real HiperSocket device to the Linux system and cut out the middle man (z/VM TCPIP) entirely. Unless there's some value to be had by having z/VM manage the traffic, it's just unnecessary

Re: Hipersockets over Guest LAN to MVS

On Tue, Jul 17th, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Alan Altmark wrote: ... TCPIP is connected to two HiperSocket networks: one real (to MVS) and one virtual (to Linux). Now, hold it right there fella. I want the order number for one of those *real* hipersockets. (haven't we been here before ... ;-) Shane

Re: Hipersockets

@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets If the OP wants to look on the z/OS side, I can think of three methods. z/OS console command: D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,DEVLINKS D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,ROUTE D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,HOME z/OS TSO command: NETSTAT DEVLINKS NETSTAT ROUTE NETSTAT HOME z/OS UNIX command: netstat -d

Re: Hipersockets

Correct the address of z/os is 192.168.1.11 -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:13 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets On 6/26/2012 at 02:29 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor

Re: Hipersockets

- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schwartz, Rodney (R.) Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:49 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets The ping times out from both the z/os and zlinux. We have multiple z/os systems and they can ping each other

Re: Hipersockets

, 2012 8:26 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets Another silly question from me. Is the z/Linux system using iptables to do firewalling? I don't know what z/Linux installs as a default. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151

Hipersockets

I am trying to get Hipersockets working between z/os and zlinux system (sles 10 SP2 running under z/vm 6.2). I have a dedicated IOD address attached: OSA FB00 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7000 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD OSA FB01 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7001 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD OSA

Re: Hipersockets

Subject: [LINUX-390] Hipersockets I am trying to get Hipersockets working between z/os and zlinux system (sles 10 SP2 running under z/vm 6.2). I have a dedicated IOD address attached: OSA FB00 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7000 DEVTYPE HIPER CHPID FB IQD OSA FB01 ATTACHED TO LINUX02 7001 DEVTYPE

Re: Hipersockets

On 6/26/2012 at 02:29 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: ip address is 192.169.1.11 I hope that was a typo and you meant the address of z/OS is 192.168.1.11? One way to figure that out would be to start tcpdump on the hsi0 interface and see what kind of IP addresses

Re: Hipersockets

If the OP wants to look on the z/OS side, I can think of three methods. z/OS console command: D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,DEVLINKS D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,ROUTE D TCPIP,,NETSTAT,HOME z/OS TSO command: NETSTAT DEVLINKS NETSTAT ROUTE NETSTAT HOME z/OS UNIX command: netstat -d netstat -r netstat -h The

Hipersockets performance?

Well I finally was able to schedule a power on reset changing chparm=00 to chparm=C0 on the hipersockets iocp definition. I then added mtu=57344 to ifcfg-hsi0, did an ifdown and ifup for hsi0. I then changed vse's tcpip definition to mtu=57344. I conducted another test and the time

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

of this file? By the way, you have chosen layer2=1 for your hsi0-device. This is ok, but it allows communication to other layer2 HiperSockets participants only, no layer3 HiperSockets participants. Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 08:39 +0100, Roger Evans wrote: Hi

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

. This is ok, but it allows communication to other layer2 HiperSockets participants only, no layer3 HiperSockets participants. Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 08:39 +0100, Roger Evans wrote: Hi, Ursula uname -a Linux DPRODDB2 2.6.32.46-0.3-default #1 SMP 2011-09

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

the ifup step fails. The configuration file for ifup is /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-hsi0. Can you check the definitions of this file? By the way, you have chosen layer2=1 for your hsi0-device. This is ok, but it allows communication to other layer2 HiperSockets participants only, no layer3

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Roger, get rid of the LLADDR='00:00:00:00:00:00' definition. ifup does no longer work for a zero MAC-address. HiperSockets define a MAC-address; during initialization Linux determines this MAC-address and uses it, if LLADDR is not defined. Ursula On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 10:47 +0100, Roger Evans

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Roger, when configuring a network interface with yast, a udev-rule is created for the device containing qeth attribute definitions, among them attribute layer2. Look into /etc/udev/rules.d and check a rule starting with 51-...7000... . I assume this rule contains a line with layer2=1. Change this

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Thank you, Ursula That solved the problem. I can now ping and ftp between my layer3 hipersockets. I still get the Waiting for mandatory devices. hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000 No interface found msg. when booting but now that it works, I'll just stop watching. You're pretty amazing. Think

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

ping and ftp between my layer3 hipersockets. I still get the Waiting for mandatory devices. hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000 No interface found msg. when booting but now that it works, I'll just stop watching. You're pretty amazing. Think you could fix the Greek deficit crisis, too

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

-bus-ccw-0.0.7000. Those are no longer needed for SLES11 and can be removed. Ursula On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:58 +0100, Roger Evans wrote: Thank you, Ursula That solved the problem. I can now ping and ftp between my layer3 hipersockets. I still get the Waiting for mandatory devices

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

vennlig hilsen Roger Evans Roger, the HiperSockets issue after HW upgrade requires a Linux upgrade: - see Novell bugzilla 659101 for SLES11 SP1 - see Novell bugzilla 662984 for SLES10 SP4 - RHEL 5.7 - RHEL 6.1 Description: qdio: use proper QEBSM operand for SIGA-R and SIGA-S Symptom

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

QIOASSIST is ON or OFF. Regards/ Med vennlig hilsen Roger Evans Roger, the HiperSockets issue after HW upgrade requires a Linux upgrade: - see Novell bugzilla 659101 for SLES11 SP1 - see Novell bugzilla 662984 for SLES10 SP4 - RHEL 5.7 - RHEL 6.1 Description: qdio: use

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Roger, the minimum SLES11 SP1 kernel level should be 2.6.32.29-0.3.1. If you still have problems with a kernel level greater or equal to this one, something else is wrong. Which qeth-related messages show up in dmesg? What does lsqeth return? Regards, Ursula Braun, IBM Germany On Mon,

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Hi, Ursula uname -a Linux DPRODDB2 2.6.32.46-0.3-default #1 SMP 2011-09-29 17:49:31 +0200 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux lsqeth ... [other devices] Device name : hsi0 - card_type : HiperSockets cdev0

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Can you try turning off QIOASSIST for the guest and see if that makes a difference? Regards, Sue Farrell -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message:

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Hi Sue Didn't seem to help. When booting with SLES10v2 I see the following when watching the boot from VM: - eth: IPv6 not supported on

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Display the kernel storage at 10b03a60.8 - in there is the instruction giving the exception. The b2220030 is the IPM used to retrieve the condition code from the previous instruction so it can be placed in a C variable. On 11/4/11 9:18 AM, Roger Evans ro...@autodata.no wrote: Hi Sue Didn't

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

What version of z/VM is this? z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0, Service Level 1101 (64-bit), Do you have all the Linux related maintenance installed for it? Hard to tell. Is there one place we can go to find out what is needed? We have installed all the APARS that IBM told us were necessary to run

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

SuSE 10.2 uname returns: kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-default I'm also trying to configure hsi0 with YAST on SuSE 11sp1 When I try to bring the interface up with ifup, I get: -- #ifup hsi0 hsi0 name: Hipersocket

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

On 11/1/2011 at 08:12 AM, Roger Evans ro...@autodata.no wrote: SuSE 10.2 uname returns: kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-default That's the SLES10 SP2 GA kernel, which is 2.5 years old. I think it might be time to apply some maintenance. :( I'm also trying to configure hsi0 with YAST on SuSE 11sp1

hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

Good morning, Mailing list We upgraded from a z9 to a z114 during the weekend, Most things seem to be working fine, but none of my linux hipersocket interfaces come up. When I try ifup hsi0, I get the following: # ifup hsi0 hsi0 hsi0 configuration: hsi-bus-ccw-0.0.7000

Re: hipersockets don't come up after HW upgrade

On 10/31/2011 at 06:00 AM, Roger Evans ro...@autodata.no wrote: Good morning, Mailing list We upgraded from a z9 to a z114 during the weekend, Most things seem to be working fine, but none of my linux hipersocket interfaces come up. -snip- None of our VM or linux definitions have

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

Kyle, please try to add line ARP=no to your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-hsi0 configuration file. Regards, Ursula -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

On 1/31/2011 at 01:49 PM, Kyle Stewart kyle.stew...@zionsbancorp.com wrote: Mark, Here is what we have: The hsi0 is a real hipersocket Linux netstat [z034876@UTLZ0002 ~]$ netstat -r Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

On Tuesday, 02/01/2011 at 06:06 EST, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote: What do the US and UH flags mean? What's the reason for the host route to 10.90.3.20? U = Up (if interface is down, flag not set, route won't be used) S = Static (i.e. human-induced config somewhere) H = Host route Alan

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

30, 2011 7:52 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS On 1/30/2011 at 03:19 AM, Naspa stewk...@naspa.net wrote: Greetings All! We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM z/OS systems to talk via hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

On Monday, 01/31/2011 at 05:22 EST, Kyle Stewart kyle.stew...@zionsbancorp.com wrote: We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM z/OS systems to talk via hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We can ping out from Linux to VM or to z/OS, but when we ping into Linux from z

Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

Greetings All! We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM z/OS systems to talk via hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We can ping out from Linux to VM or to z/OS, but when we ping into Linux from z/VM z/OS the 'tcpdump -I hsi0 ip proto \\icmp' on the Linux only shows

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

I forgot to mention that we can ping via hsi0 to /from either of the Linux guests. -Original Message- From: Naspa Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:19 AM To: 'Linux on 390 Port' Subject: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS Greetings All! We have been struggling trying to get

Re: Hipersockets Not working z/Linux to z/VM z/OS

On 1/30/2011 at 03:19 AM, Naspa stewk...@naspa.net wrote: Greetings All! We have been struggling trying to get our z/VM z/OS systems to talk via hipersockets to our RHEL5.3 Linux (under z/VM 6.1). We can ping out from Linux to VM or to z/OS, but when we ping into Linux from z/VM z/OS

  1   2   3   4   5   >