I had said, "Once it's up, Linux is Linux".
Robert noted:
>> Right up until you want to install some piece of software.
>> Unless you have the source, then linux is x86, or linux is arm,
>> or linux is z.
>>
>> This is the main issue we ran into in getting acceptance of
>> Linux on z here, and
On Monday, 03/21/2016 at 08:19 GMT, Mike Hammock
wrote:
> Actually I think Alan means the RD program, not RDz (athough RDz is a
nice
> tool also.) What is now RDT(Rational Develop and Test) used to be made
> vailable under the RDz banner, but it is a separate product now.
ST.EDU
Subject: Re: How many shops... ?
On Friday, 03/18/2016 at 01:18 GMT, "Nix, Robert P." <nix.rob...@mayo.edu>
wrote:
> There needs to be wider acceptance within the software vendor community
> for Linux on z (and / or Linux on ARM, Linux on PPC, ?, Linux on thing
Long
On Mon, 3/21/16, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: How many shops... ?
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: Monday, March 21, 2016, 11:32 AM
On Friday, 03/18/2016 at 01:18 GMT,
"Nix, Robert P." <
On Friday, 03/18/2016 at 01:18 GMT, "Nix, Robert P."
wrote:
> There needs to be wider acceptance within the software vendor community
> for Linux on z (and / or Linux on ARM, Linux on PPC, ?, Linux on things
> beyond x86). The problem is that the vendors can go to HP, or
t; wrote:
On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Ambros, Thomas wrote:
To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a
'one-off', where would one find out for themselves roughly how many
shops in North America are running production implementations of Linux
on system Z and what proportion of al
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: How many shops... ?
³Once it¹s up, linux is linux²Š
Right up until you want to install some piece of software. Unless you have the
source, then linux is x86, or linux is arm, or linux is z.
This is the main issue we ran into in getting acceptance of Linux
Rockhopper and Emperor go the way of zBX and slowly fade into
>obscurity?
>
>Regards,
>James Huckert
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
>Nix, Robert P.
>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:16 AM
>To: LINUX-390@VM.MARI
On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Ambros, Thomas wrote:
> To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a 'one-off',
> where would one find out for themselves roughly how many shops in North
> America are running production implementations of Linux on system Z and what
> propo
:
>> To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a
>>'one-off', where would one find out for themselves roughly how many
>>shops in North America are running production implementations of Linux
>>on system Z and what proportion of all zSeries sites that might be?
On 3/17/16, 6:50 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Troth"
> <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU on behalf of r...@casita.net> wrote:
>
> >On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Ambros, Thomas wrote:
> >> To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a
> >>
Hi,
On 03/18/2016 02:16 PM, Nix, Robert P. wrote:
³Once it¹s up, linux is linux²Š
Right up until you want to install some piece of software. Unless you have
the source, then linux is x86, or linux is arm, or linux is z.
This is the main issue we ran into in getting acceptance of Linux on z
>and aren¹t willing to invest in a Z system at all simply to test their
product.
Hercules.
> * ARM (your smart phone), not necessarily Android
RaspberryPi
> * PPC (IBM RS/6000 or even older Apple servers)
qemu runs 32 bit Debian
Regards,
Paul
z/VM and
roughly 25 Linux on System z servers. We don't have any IFL-only CEC's.
Harley
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:19 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: How many shops
this helps,
Kurt Acker
Cell: 607-348-8197
IBM Smarter Planet, Smarter Data Centers
Virtualization and Enterprise System Management Technologies
From: "Ambros, Thomas" <thomas_amb...@keybank.com>
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 03/14/2016 11:44 AM
Subject: How many
>>> On 3/14/2016 at 12:19 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> I doubt very much that that information is publicly available anywhere.
> Actual, hard numbers of this sort are considered proprietary marketing
> information by IBM, think.
And not only by IBM. SUSE and Red Hat think
ould think it'd be
reasonably close).
To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a 'one-off', where
would one find out for themselves roughly how many shops in North America are
running production implementations of Linux on system Z and what proportion of
all zSeries sites
n system Z is a 'one-off', where
would one find out for themselves roughly how many shops in North America are
running production implementations of Linux on system Z and what proportion of
all zSeries sites that might be?
Thomas Ambros
zEnterprise Operating Systems
zEnterprise Systems Manageme
18 matches
Mail list logo