>>> On 11/17/2015 at 10:12 AM, Ray Mansell wrote:
> Speaking of disk address changes... how does one cope with that? We have
> a new DS8700 to replace our ancient DS8000s, and I'm wondering what is
> the best way to migrate our LPAR Linux servers to the new box? I'm sure
> this
Speaking of disk address changes... how does one cope with that? We have
a new DS8700 to replace our ancient DS8000s, and I'm wondering what is
the best way to migrate our LPAR Linux servers to the new box? I'm sure
this must have been done before, so I'd be very interested to learn how
others
On Tuesday, 11/17/2015 at 10:14 EST, Ray Mansell wrote:
> Speaking of disk address changes... how does one cope with that? We have
> a new DS8700 to replace our ancient DS8000s, and I'm wondering what is
> the best way to migrate our LPAR Linux servers to the new box? I'm sure
>
If you can't do what Alan said, you can do ddr from z/vm or dd in linux
which have access to both - old and new storage (the old linux should be
down during the clone process)
There are good chances that it will ipl fine from new storage.
As Mark mentioned, it might depend how did you set it in
It worked for us :)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ray
Mansell
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:35 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
Thanks, Marcy - Perhaps I
Thank you Mark, and Alan, and Gregory...
I think our problem is going to be more one of boredom rather than
encountering insurmountable problems, as DDR plods its way through
several hundred volumes. Originally I thought we were going to have to
cope with changing device numbers on the new
down your VM & Linux first though.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ray
Mansell
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:38 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
Thank
I see two kinds of ECKD DASD in what you're describing: disk with one
partition used as a filesystem, and disk with one partition used as a
"PV" to LVM.
Assuming CDL ("compatible" disk layout) you probably have the device
number prefixed with "0X" as the volser. If you simply DDR from virtual
to
Thanks, Marcy - Perhaps I can offload all this effort onto our z/OS
admin. I rather like the sound of that...
Ray
On 11/17/2015 15:55, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Changing devices numbers is generally not a problem unless you have lots of
dedicated devices.
SSI needs a bit of work as well if you have
-DAY) kevin.mor...@reedelsevier.com
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 01/07/2015 13:56
Subject:Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
We currently have 22 zLinux guests (all running RHEL 6.4) on 7 zVM (v6.2)
LPARs
-fiet-fbcs-ceng-citp/4/4b1/748
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 01/07/2015 03:18:45:
From: Morris, Kevin J. (RET-DAY) kevin.mor...@reedelsevier.com
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 01/07/2015 12:56
Subject: Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
Sent by: Linux on 390
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 02:18:45 +
Morris, Kevin J. (RET-DAY) kevin.mor...@reedelsevier.com wrote:
Given our static environment, can anyone provide any glaringly
obvious caveats/downfalls to migrating from zVM to standalone zLinux
LPARs that we might be missing?
This is not that easy to
On Wednesday, 07/01/2015 at 07:56 EDT, Morris, Kevin J. (RET-DAY)
kevin.mor...@reedelsevier.com wrote:
I know that we will lose the capability to overcommit/share memory
between
zLinux systems, but the application running in this environment is very
response-time critical/sensitive so we
Hello, Kevin.
That's an interesting direction for your company to take. Can you
elaborate a bit on what drove the decision to not exploit virtualization?
As far as the move from z/VM to bare metal LPARs, I don't see any
potential problems, as long as the LPARs are defined with enough
physical
] On Behalf Of Morris,
Kevin J. (RET-DAY)
Sent: 01 July 2015 03:19
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
We currently have 22 zLinux guests (all running RHEL 6.4) on 7 zVM (v6.2) LPARs
spread across 6 CECs (29 IFLs in total) all to support numerous
We currently have 22 zLinux guests (all running RHEL 6.4) on 7 zVM (v6.2) LPARs
spread across 6 CECs (29 IFLs in total) all to support numerous environments
for a single application.
Here is our current zVM LPAR / zLinux guest configuration:
1. Sandbox zVM LPAR - 3 zLinux systems only for
As usually LPARs have a lot of devices connected to them you might want to
start using cio_ignore if you are not already using it.
Not using cio_ignore can really slow down linux startup when the LPAR has a
lot of devices connected to it.
On Jul 1, 2015 5:32 PM, Alan Altmark
[mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Morris,
Kevin J. (RET-DAY)
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 8:19 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Migrate zLinux off zVM into standalone LPARs?
We currently have 22 zLinux guests (all running RHEL 6.4) on 7 zVM (v6.2) LPARs
spread across 6 CECs (29 IFLs
Has anyone ever known a static environment that has remained static?
We have had zVM for 10 years, and in the last 8 years we have only retired
zLinux systems.
Also, our largest zVM LPAR only has 6 zLinux guests with two zVM LPARs only
having 1 zLinux guest -- almost no point in running zVM in
19 matches
Mail list logo