Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, McKown, John wrote: > No money. "Linux is FREE!" I don't know how our marketting rep talked our > management to getting an IFL and z/VM when we upgraded to our z/800. We have > NO consolidation plans or any other "plan" for how to use Linux/390. Lots of > talk, but no real act

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Ann Smith
We're no experts but we basically use the same minidisk addresses for the various linux guests. We also tend to put application products in their own filesystem on a separate VM minidisk. So our linux guests have basically the same minidisks for the SuSE linux filesystems. We didn't have a problem

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Tom Duerbusch
When we bought our MP3000, not only Linux was free, but by committing to have the business partner install Linux, we got a heafty discount on the hardware. I think IBM knows, that once Linux gets into the mainframe, and system programmers start looking at it, it will be used. And will be used to

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread McKown, John
, 2003 10:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM > > > And if you're going to create multiple images, do yourself a favor up > front, go ahead and install DIRMAINT. Create a CMS DASD group and a > Linux DASD group for

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Chet Norris
And if you're going to create multiple images, do yourself a favor up front, go ahead and install DIRMAINT. Create a CMS DASD group and a Linux DASD group for seamless minidisk allocations. Then talk to your IBM rep about a class overviewing z/VM basic's, Linux and cloning. --- Adam Thornton <[EMA

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Stephen Frazier
Many years ago I stared using addresses in the range 700-7FF for virtual DASD on all may guests. I have never had real DASD in this range. That way when someone says something about a DASD at some address I know if they are talking about a real address or a virtual address. I also use the same addr

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I always keep the virtual address different from the real address. (unless I'm running in a perferred guest system) RE: That allows me to easily move minidisks to other units without making any other changes then the "user direct" file. Also, if you have multiple minidisks defined on a real volu

Re: Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread Adam Thornton
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 09:13, McKown, John wrote: > I have a general administration / setup question for people who are running > multiple Linux/390 systems under z/VM. Do all your Linux instances use the > same virtual addresses for things like DASD, regardless of the actual device > address? Yes.

Question about multiple Linux/390 instances under z/VM

2003-06-10 Thread McKown, John
I have a general administration / setup question for people who are running multiple Linux/390 systems under z/VM. Do all your Linux instances use the same virtual addresses for things like DASD, regardless of the actual device address? Or do you find it "better" to make the virtual DASD address ma