Re: SLES9 SP3 64 bit service question

2007-03-16 Thread Mark Perry
Tom, ultimately complaints on how informative SPident is should go to SUSE (Mark Post?) :-) Looking at your output it is informing you that Xfree86-Mesa (64 and 32bit) is backlevel. But interestingly on SP1 and SP2, not SP3. If your installation was followed to the letter of the SUSE docs, then

Re: SLES9 SP3 64 bit service question

2007-03-16 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Well...it may be telling me everything I need to know.but...I don't know if it is meaningful. 1. Why, on a straight vanilla installation, I would get such an error? 2. Apparently, no one else has gotten this error (no one else chimed in saying they had it also). 3. When I can't tie down

Re: SLES9 SP3 64 bit service question

2007-03-15 Thread Vic Cross
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Duerbusch wrote: Thanks...that was interesting, but seemly useless G. Have no idea what it is trying to tell me. Just because you don't understand what it's saying, doesn't mean it's useless... :) Just for kicks, here is the results: linux40:~ #

Re: SLES9 SP3 64 bit service question

2007-03-14 Thread Mark Perry
Tom Duerbusch wrote: I just installed SLES9 with SP3 64 bit. But when I do: linux40:~ # SPident -v Summary(using 549 packages) Product/ServicePack conflictmatch update (shipped) SLES-9-s390x 00%278 50.6% 0 (1555 17.9%) SLES-9-s390x-SP1

Re: SLES9 SP3 64 bit service question

2007-03-14 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Thanks...that was interesting, but seemly useless G. Have no idea what it is trying to tell me. As this was a fresh install of SLES9 with SP3 with the default package selection, I would expect no conflicts. So I expect: CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date! foundSLES-9-s390x