On 2021-04-05 11:56:30 (+), rosea.grammostola wrote:
> This leads to the next problematic situation, that the JACK maintainer
> is also the initiator and maintainer of the NSM fork.
Filipe is **not** the maintainer of new-session-manager, yet you
continue spreading lies about this and are
Hi all,
On 2021-04-04 21:31:25 (+0100), Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> I'm not willing to open and engage into yet another discussion about
> the so called "NSM fork",
and yet this is exactly what happened.
@Rui given that **you know** how this topic derails, the correct thing
to do would have been to
On 4/5/21 2:34 PM, hgn wrote:
Just a certain individual doesn't want to stop. The list went into
moderation for him not that long ago, that was a good move to get all
that nonsense quiet.
I beg your pardon?
that person is not certainly me, or is he/she?
are you asking that I should be
On 05/04/21 20:31, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
besides all the non-technical issues that I won't repeat here, i
should say that was a disgraceful move to begin with, that
(double-handledly) resulted in what you all know (and/or chose to
ignore).
Sorry but what exactly the move to jackaudio.org
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, April 5, 2021 11:25 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 10:37:25PM +, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> > Somehow they need backup to get some authority apparently.
>
> Gotohttps://jackaudio.org and look around. Do you see NewSM there
Will Godfrey:
Can this argument be taken private? It's going round and round and
getting
absolutely nowhere.
If I want noise I can go to facebook or twitter :(
Yes please, The whole matter has already been resolved for a long time,
or actually there never was a "matter".
Just a certain
Can this argument be taken private? It's going round and round and getting
absolutely nowhere.
If I want noise I can go to facebook or twitter :(
--
Will J Godfrey
https://willgodfrey.bandcamp.com/
http://yoshimi.github.io
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 10:37:25PM +, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> Somehow they need backup to get some authority apparently.
Goto https://jackaudio.org and look around. Do you see NewSM there ?
It's not even in the applications list (it probably should be).
Also please try to understand the
On 04/04/21 23:26, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 4/4/21 11:06 PM, Nils Hilbricht wrote:
please read the subject line!
it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session
managers in general nor NSM in particular.
>
> NSM's strict rules for client behaviour are what ensures that it will
> be able to perform as promised. Something similar was missing in all
> other Linux session manager systems I know of. So I'm very happy to
> see Jack-session deprecated.
>
> Just my 2e-2 Euro of course.
I think this is
On 4/4/21 11:06 PM, Nils Hilbricht wrote:
please read the subject line!
it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in
general nor NSM in particular.
Then let me rephrase:
Why should NSM not be
On 4/4/21 10:29 PM, Nils Hilbricht wrote:
Then somebody interjected with
"Note that Non-Session-Manager (NSM) is explicitly designed without any dependency
to JACK."
To which I responded:
And it still is. You can use it with ALSA only, no sound programs at all or
PipeWire. And so it will
Hi all,
Please refer to this thread on linuxmusicians.com forum, starting here:
re. Non-Session-Manager fork descalation
https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?p=130477#p130477
I'm not willing to open and engage into yet another discussion about the
so called "NSM fork", though I still don't
>please read the subject line!
>it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
>it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in
>general nor NSM in particular.
Then let me rephrase:
Why should NSM not be hosted under jackaudio, since it is the
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 10:01:53PM +0100, Filipe Coelho wrote:
> I remember Nils writing there very clearly with an explanation for the why.
I see absolutely no problem with having NewSM hosted on jackaudio.org.
> In my opinion jack-session API is too simple and lacks rules for client
>
On 04/04/21 21:31, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>Although I still don't understand what jackaudio.org has to do with the
>new(er)-session-management (aka "NSM fork") and why it is now moved from
>linuxaudio.org to jackaudio.org.
I am paraphrasing my answer from the LinuxMusiciansForum. I copied that
On 04/04/21 21:31, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Hi all,
Please refer to this thread on linuxmusicians.com forum, starting here:
re. Non-Session-Manager fork descalation
https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?p=130477#p130477
I'm not willing to open and engage into yet another discussion about
the
17 matches
Mail list logo
