x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600S CPU @ 2.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
--
Sandy McArthur, Jr.
No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.
- Letters and Other Writings of James Madison (1865), Vol. IV, p. 491
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
].corruption_errs 2
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot be honest.
- Thomas Paine
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
corrected errors: 512, uncorrectable errors: 1, unverified errors: 0
Still, the output when wrapping up is still not intuitive to me:
scrub started at Tue Jan 13 01:18:22 2015, interrupted after 136982
seconds, not running
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Sandy McArthur Jr sandy...@gmail.com wrote
errors
error details: verify=19 csum=494
corrected errors: 512, uncorrectable errors: 1, unverified errors: 0
# uname -a
Linux mcplex 3.18.2-gentoo #1 SMP Mon Jan 12 10:24:25 EST 2015 x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600S CPU @ 2.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
# btrfs --version
Btrfs v3.18.1
--
Sandy
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Sandy McArthur Jr sandy...@gmail.com wrote:
Would the `btrfs check` output below indicate only small error and
that a --repair is likely to succeed?
It did. Thanks Qu and Duncan.
dmesg suggests I have some scrubbing to do:
[220283.369150] BTRFS: bdev /dev/sdh1
...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Original Message
Subject: If btrfs-find-root doesn't find tree roots is the filesystem lost?
From: Sandy McArthur Jr sandy...@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2014年12月04日 09:20
I have a many-disk btrfs filesystem that I
lines]
--
Sandy McArthur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
have either the time or the
skills with kernel programming that would be needed).
Maybe this happens already: Might a similar effect be automatically
achieved by tracking per-device I/O load averages and distributing
reads based on the I/O loads of possible read devices?
--
Sandy McArthur
temporarily.
That said my biggest btrfs problem happened while I had some drives on
SATA and others on USB.
--
Sandy McArthur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
balance has been run successfully and completely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot
improve these files?
I do have a number rolling readonly snapshots on the subvolume these
files are on. I can imagine how that might be related but I'm not
sure. When the pre-defrag snapshots are purged will the filefrag
extents count drop.
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Sandy McArthur posted on Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:18:50 -0400 as excerpted:
While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I
ran the following commands:
# filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file
/path
where all I can think to do is wipe disk 4 and then
add it back in. Is there anything else I should try first. I have
booted btrfs-next with the latest btrfs-progs.
Thanks.
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot be honest.
- Thomas Paine
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
to
read from the slowest drive that would likely be your bottleneck for
that read.
Another drive arrived today, I'll see what happens when I mix/match
USB3 and SATA connected drives.
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot be honest.
- Thomas Paine
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
I specified for no changes to be attempted. This would have saved me
time and the emotional grief of my perceiving that my problems were
persisting a btrfsck.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Sandy McArthur posted on Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:06:05 -0400 as excerpted
System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=132.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1: total=2.00GB, used=1.13GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Sandy McArthur sandy...@gmail.com wrote:
I was able to recover the filesystem using the btrfsck from git (Btrfs
by a `rm
/path/to/busted/tmp-file` from different kernel versions as they look
different enough to me to possibly be helpful.
I'm happy to provide whatever other info is needed. An image of the
filesystem isn't so practical as it's large.
--
Sandy McArthur
He who dares not offend cannot be honest
17 matches
Mail list logo