Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-H5UzH8/linux-4.10.0/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2318

2017-08-11 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2017-08-11 05:57, Piotr Pawłow wrote: Hello, So 4.10 isn't /too/ far out of range yet, but I'd strongly consider upgrading (or downgrading to 4.9 LTS) as soon as it's reasonably convenient, before 4.13 in any case. Unless you prefer to go the distro support route, of course. I used to

Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-H5UzH8/linux-4.10.0/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2318

2017-08-11 Thread Piotr Pawłow
Hello, > So 4.10 isn't /too/ far out of range yet, but I'd strongly consider > upgrading (or downgrading to 4.9 LTS) as soon as it's reasonably > convenient, before 4.13 in any case. Unless you prefer to go the > distro support route, of course. I used to stick to latest kernels back when

Re: kernel BUG at /build/linux-H5UzH8/linux-4.10.0/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2318

2017-08-07 Thread Duncan
Piotr Pawłow posted on Mon, 07 Aug 2017 15:26:16 +0200 as excerpted: > # uname -a > Linux pps 4.10.0-30-generic #34-Ubuntu SMP > Mon Jul 31 19:38:17 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This is a general principles reply and chances are wouldn't help with your issue since the spread isn't

kernel BUG at /build/linux-H5UzH8/linux-4.10.0/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2318

2017-08-07 Thread Piotr Pawłow
): stripe index math went horribly wrong, got stripe_index=2176876031, num_stripes=2 sie 07 04:45:06 pps kernel: BTRFS info (device dm-1): csum failed ino 1340360 extent 5370531217408 csum 716315696 wanted 722897355 mirror -2118091264 sie 07 04:45:06 pps kernel: kernel BUG at /build/linux-H5UzH8/linux