Hi,
I can't give you a specific answer to your question. But because btrfs
is still under heavy development you shouldn't use it with those old
kernels at all in my oppinion. You should never be more than one
version away from the current stable kernel.
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:3
Hi Matthew,
I'm not sure what you are trying to achive. Couldn't you simply do
another snapshot of the subvolume? I don't understand why you want to
use send/receive on the same subvolume to be honest.
Regards,
Felix
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Matthew Lai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is this supp
Hi,
please take a look into this thread:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30573.html
I had a similiar problem and got the answer + a fix from the list.
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Miguel Negrão
wrote:
> Em 23-01-2014 14:19, Josef Bacik escreveu:
>>
>> On 01/23/2
wrote:
> Hello Felix,
>
>
> On 01/10/2014 03:26 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wang,
>>
>> here are the versioninformation:
>>
>> server log # btrfs version
>> Btrfs v3.12-dirty
>> server log # uname -a
>> Linux server.home 3.12.6
?
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
> Hi Wang,
>
> thank you for your answer.
>
> I am using the latest btrfs-progs with the 3.12 kernel. I don't have
> access to the machine right now (it looks like it crashed :/) but I
> can send t
h
> to
> make things more friendly.
>
> Thanks,
> Wang
>
> On 01/09/2014 06:04 AM, Felix Blanke wrote:
>>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> My backup stopped working and I can't figure out why. I'm using
>> send/receive with the "-p" switch
Hi List,
My backup stopped working and I can't figure out why. I'm using
send/receive with the "-p" switch for incremental backups using the
last snapshot as a parent snapshot for sending only the changed data.
The problem occurs using my own backup script. After I discovered the
problem I did a
Hi,
fyi: Raid5/6 hit mainline in 3.9, with 3.8 you will not be able to use
those raid levels.
Regards,
Felix
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:07:53PM -0700, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I have a filesystem that is spanning about 10 devi
Stefan Behrens
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:51:59 +0200, Felix Blanke wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was trying the new send/receive feature today but can't make it work.
>>
>> These are the commands I was using:
>>
>> btrfs subvol snap -r /mnt/d
Hi everyone,
I was trying the new send/receive feature today but can't make it work.
These are the commands I was using:
btrfs subvol snap -r /mnt/data1/@downloads/ /mnt/data1/snapshots/testsnap
btrfs send /mnt/data1/snapshots/testsnap | btrfs receive
/mnt/data1/snapshots/testreceive/
This comm
On 5/30/12 12:14 AM, Maxim Mikheev wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently decided to use btrfs. It works perfectly for a week even
under heavy load. Yesterday I destroyed backups as cannot afford to have
~10TB in backups. I decided to switch on Btrfs because it was announced
that it stable already
I n
On 5/8/12 8:29 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
As I've written many times: I want a system for my video collection
which allows
adding a bigger disk
deleting/removing a smaller disk
with simple commands.
btrfs seems to be able to do that (
On 5/8/12 6:53 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Felix,
>
> Du meintest am 08.05.12:
>
>>> Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the
>>> directory tree does the job.
>
>> Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is telling
>> you: The problem you have r
On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Clemens,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for
repairing an ext2/3/4 system.
Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as
doomed.
Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of
On 5/7/12 6:36 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 07.05.12:
It's dead - R.I.P.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I don't think we can point the
finger at btrfs here.
a) you know what to do with the bearer?
b) I like such errors - completely independent, but simulta
On 3/26/12 10:30 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Hi,
I have a local btrfs file system with various sub-volumes that have
had snapshots done on them.
Is there some tool like rsync that I could copy all the data and
snapshots to a backup system, but still only use the same amount of
space as the
Hi Helmut,
are you sure that 'mkfs.ext2/3/4 -L "label" /dev/xxx' doesn't create a
new fs?
Afaik to change a label of a given (ext2/3/4) filesystem you should use
tune2fs.
I don't have a linux system available right now but this is what I would
expect and what would make a lot more sense th
t;Put DB in hot backup mode and then create a snapshot". I'm not sure
if there is a way to integrate RMAN backups with btrfs snapshots. Maybe
an oracle expert could help out.
Kind regards,
Felix Blanke
On 2/20/12 4:29 PM, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
On 02/20/2012 07:49 PM, Andrew Henry wrote:
that isn't an argument for not upgrading.
There are new bugs in 3.2, but on the other hand there are hundreds of
fixed bugs, new features etc.
Especially using alpha releases of software without upgrading whenever
there is a chance to seems very strange to me :)
Kind regards,
Felix Blanke
--
Hi,
I tried my SSD with luks and it is damn slow. I don't have any numbers for i/o
per
second but the read/write speed was <50% of the speed without luks. If you want
encryption and speed you have to use loopaes. Unfortunetly you have to patch
your
util-linux for that.
The advantage of loo
I'm using btrfs since one year now and it's quite fast. I don't feel any
differences to other filesystems. Never tried a benchmark but for my
daily work it's nice. I also never had any issues with the memory. Imho
nowadays memory isn't a problem at all in desktop computers. I bought
8gb of memo
Well, the mail still says the truth :)
On 7/10/11 11:57 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 10.07.11:
I'll be quiet about this topic now. I've to admit that I was a little
bit drunk yesterday. Sorry again!
Don't drink and write!
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe fro
You don't understood me. Ofc the developer need bug reports and all that
stuff. But it's the way youre doing it. Imho a lot of your mails sounds
like the only goal of them are to punish btrfs.
Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, then I'm sorry. I'll be quite
about this topic now. I've t
Did you ever say something positive about btrfs? :D All I read from in
the last months is complaining about btrfs.
In this case it was his fault because he forget to update the fstab. Im
pretty sure it was also your fault when you screwed up your 2.6.38.5
kernel...
I'm sorry but it seems that 90
Hi,
nope. All patches to the btrfs-progs aren't yet in the git. I think
it's up to chris to push all the patches.
Regards,
Felix
Am 08 Apr 2011 14:00:00 +0200
schrieb "Helmut Hullen" :
> Hallo, linux-btrfs,
>
> when I run "balance" or "delete" and "/dev/btrfs-control" doesn't
> exist or is no
Yeah, for me its loop-aes.
Ah ok, didn't knew that it replaces that whole loop thing :)
Felix
On Feb 11, 2011 8:32 PM, "Milan Broz" wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 08:23 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
>> What do you mean with "configured"?
>>
>> I'm using lo
Hi,
are you sure that patch is in the kernel?
I'm using 2.6.37 and don't have those attribues in my /sys.
Felix
On 10. February 2011 - 13:29, Petr Uzel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:29:27 +0100
> From: Petr Uzel
> To: Chris Samuel
> Cc: Felix Blanke , kreij...
I can't help you with your problem, but:
It is a really really really bad idea to store data without a backup on a
filesystem
that is still in some kind of alpha stadium (don't understand me wrong, I like
btrfs
and you guys do a really good job. But the lack of a working fsck keeps btrfs
in tha
Hi,
I don't think that the fs is a good place to store default mountoptions.
If you want to auto mount usb devices with compression, just write a
udev rule or whatever ubuntu uses to mount usb devices.
Regards,
Felix
Am Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:44:03 -0600
schrieb Kirk Wolff :
> As I've been using
Hi,
balancing 1TB of data can take > 1 day. So I don't think there is something
wrong
just because the third device got no io. Just wait some more hours.
I don't know how the balancing does his work, but it is possible that it first
balance throught the old devices and then add the new one or so
Hi,
you should search the mailinglist before you write patches :)
That problem is known and a patch is available:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/449001/
But it isn't in the btrfs-progs git yet.
Regards,
Felix
Am Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:38:25 +0100
schrieb "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" :
> Hi,
>
s, please CC my @users.sourceforge.net
address, or linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org
Felix Blanke wrote:
> If I'm using the unpatched losetup (from util-linux-ng) and looping a
> device like
>
> /dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD6400AAKS-22A7B2_WD-WCASY7780706-part3
>
> it is using readlink to trac
et me now, otherwise I'll stop posting about this in the
btrfs-list.
Thanks for your help!
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 22:04, Felix Blanke wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:04:54 +0100
> From: Felix Blanke
> To: Hugo Mills
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: R
l of gentoo and compile it by my own there are readlinks.
I'll
take a look if there are any gentoo-patches applied during the build.
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 17:00, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:00:24 +
> From: Hugo Mills
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: linux-
util-linux-2.18-r1 and still no symlink following.
I'll ask for that at the kernel mailing list in the next days. If your (Hugo)
util-linux doesn't include any kind of patches that behaviour is really strange.
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 15:44, Felix Blanke wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:29:36PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >If, instead, the initial losetup call tracked the symlinks back to
> > the original device node (i.e. something like "/dev/sdb3", or
> > "/dev/mapper/ruthven-btest" in my example), then the name that's
> > stored in the kernel wou
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:53:05PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
> > On 24. January 2011 - 13:13, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:01:04PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > you were talking about the LOOP_
On 24. January 2011 - 13:13, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:13:41 +
> From: Hugo Mills
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: kreij...@inwind.it, Hugo Mills ,
> linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
> Mail-Followup-To: Hugo Mills , Fe
The strace still contains the
truncated
path, and no '*'. Therefore I think that ioctl is from the kernel.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 23:02, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:02:16 +0100
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli
> To: Hugo Mills , Felix
Lol :)
You can't use labels for the decryption, because an encrypted device has no
label, it
doesn't even have a filesystem and you can't say if there are any kind of data
on it
(in my case) :)
You can use labels after you have decrypted the device. Then I'm using labels,
too.
But that doesn't
loop-aes.
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 08:53, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:53:41 +0700
> From: "Fajar A. Nugraha"
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:58 AM,
If the path is to long they add a '*' :) Do you think that will solve the
problem?
I'll try it tomorrow.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 23:27, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:27:20 +
> From: Hugo Mills
> To: kreij...@inwind.it
> Cc: H
place to report that bug is?
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 23:02, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:02:16 +0100
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli
> To: Hugo Mills , Felix Blanke
>
> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Hi,
no :)
All those patches need to be applied to the current git. I'm sure there will be
an
e-mail if all those patches are applied.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 15:26, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Date: 23 Jan 2011 15:26:00 +0100
> From: Helmut Hullen
> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> S
rfs?!
>
>
> On Sun, January 23, 2011 2:56 am, Felix Blanke wrote:
>
>
> > It was a simple:
> >
> > mkfs.btrfs -L backup -d single /dev/loop2
> >
> > But it also happens without the options, like:
> >
> > mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop2
> >
>
, 22 Jan 2011 15:11:24 +0000
> From: Hugo Mills
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
> Mail-Followup-To: Hugo Mills , Felix Blanke
> , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:52:22PM +0100, Felix Bl
I was able to create the fs with the --force options. But that bug should be
fixed,
too :)
Is that link maybe too long? It is created by udev, and there was never a
problem
using that link.
Regards,
Felix
On 22. January 2011 - 15:45, Felix Blanke wrote:
> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:45
Hi,
I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups.
When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I'm getting
"error checking /dev/loop2 mount status"
With strace I see where the problem is:
lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par",
0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (N
ate: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:26:51 +0100
> From: Maximilian Mehnert
> To: linux-btrfs
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -v option to btrfsctl to control verbosity: Be
> quiet unless requested.
>
> On 22/01/11 13:11, Felix Blanke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > btrfsctl is dep
Hi,
btrfsctl is deprecated, why you're adding new options to it? :)
Regards,
Felix
On 22. January 2011 - 12:59, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:59:22 +0100
> From: Maximilian Mehnert
> To: linux-btrfs
> Subject: [PATCH] Add -v option to btrfsctl to control verbosity: Be
Hi,
just slap me if the question is stupid, but when will all those new features be
added
to the btrfs-progs?
The last commit is at
"git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git"
is from oct. 2010?!?
Regards,
Felix
On 17. January 2011 - 16:13, Chris Mason wro
Am Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:37:38 +0900
schrieb Tsutomu Itoh :
> Hi.
>
> (2010/11/11 16:48), Helmut Hullen wrote:
> > Hallo, Hugo,
> >
> > Du meintest am 10.11.10:
> >
> >>> findfs LABEL=MM2
> >>>
> >>> shows "/dev/sdd2" (the first partition)
> >>>
> >>> file -s /dev/sdd2
> >>>
gt; Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 04:33:30 -0600
> From: cwillu
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: How to see raid level?!
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Felix Blanke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I saw some reports of ppl in this list wh
Hi,
I saw some reports of ppl in this list who did a "btrfs fi df /path" and saw the
raidlevel of the data, metadata etc.
How? :)
I'm using the git version of the btrfs progs and 2.6.36, but I don't see those
informations.
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
What am I doing wrong? :(
Regards,
Fe
Hi Helmut,
don't use btrfs for important files if you got no backup yet. It's
quite stable and a lot of ppl don't have problem with it, but there are
some cases where it could be very ugly, like a powerloss while writing
etc.
Regards,
Felix
Am 01 Nov 2010 09:02:00 +0100
schrieb "Helmut Hullen"
Hi,
that was a good hint, thanks a lot!
The best at that solution is that it works for all filesystems: Just test if the
output of $type (type=`blkid -s TYPE -o value $loopdev`) is empty (''), then it
is no
filesystem and the loopaes password was wrong or the device/fs is broken.
Felix
On 2
Hi,
I've some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes.
I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the
decrypted fs
is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in
my
script.
Thanks for any help!
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this li
Which is a really good thing!
HTML e-mails are useless and nobody should use them! I'm sure they came
directly from hell.
David Nicol schrieb:
Wow, vger categorically refuses HTML e-mail!
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, David Nicol wrote:
the inode number is an "unsigned long" which on a
Hi,
that issue is allready reported to this mailinglist and there is a longer
conversation about it.
Cheers,
Felix
On 04. October 2010 - 15:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:19:41 +0200
> From: Tomasz Chmielewski
> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: flood of btr
Worked like it should for me :)
Thanks a lot for your work.
I hope this patch will be merged soon.
Like G.Baroncelli says: It's such an essential feature.
Regards,
Felix
Goffredo Baroncelli schrieb:
Hi all,
this patch adds the command "btrfs filesystem label" to change (or show) the
label
e, copying data back etc.?
Regards,
Felix
On 07. September 2010 - 20:46, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:46:19 -0400
> From: Jérôme Poulin
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org"
> Subject: Re: btrfs and raid1 (restore)
>
> Now tha
Hi,
I made a REALLY bad mistake today.
I've two hdds which are running at raid1 via btrfs. Today I mistyped a
device-node
and did a "mkfs.vfat" on one of them.
Then I simply did a "btrfs filesystem balance /path/". "btrfs filesystem show
/path/"
now looks like this:
Label: 'home1' uuid: c3c3
Hi,
I don't know what the problem is but I'm also using gentoo and the live ebuild
(amd64) and it compiles fine with
"scooter ~ # gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo 4.4.3-r2 p1.2) 4.4.3"
Regards,
Felix
On 28. August 2010 - 21:56, Zhu Yanhai wrote:
> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:56:48 +0800
> From: Zhu Ya
x27;s such an elementary thing.
Thanks again for your help!
Regards,
Felix
On 24. August 2010 - 23:35, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:35:23 +0200
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli
> To: Felix Blanke
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Set/change
Hi,
is there any way to set/change the label after the filesystem has been created?
Best regards,
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.ht
65 matches
Mail list logo
