Hi,
I can't give you a specific answer to your question. But because btrfs
is still under heavy development you shouldn't use it with those old
kernels at all in my oppinion. You should never be more than one
version away from the current stable kernel.
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at
Hi Matthew,
I'm not sure what you are trying to achive. Couldn't you simply do
another snapshot of the subvolume? I don't understand why you want to
use send/receive on the same subvolume to be honest.
Regards,
Felix
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Matthew Lai m...@matthewlai.ca wrote:
Hi,
please take a look into this thread:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30573.html
I had a similiar problem and got the answer + a fix from the list.
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Miguel Negrão
miguel.negrao-li...@friendlyvirus.org wrote:
Em 23-01-2014 14:19,
...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hello Felix,
On 01/10/2014 03:26 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi Wang,
here are the versioninformation:
server log # btrfs version
Btrfs v3.12-dirty
server log # uname -a
Linux server.home 3.12.6-hardened-r3 #1 SMP Thu Jan 2 13:16:48 CET
2014 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU
more friendly.
Thanks,
Wang
On 01/09/2014 06:04 AM, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi List,
My backup stopped working and I can't figure out why. I'm using
send/receive with the -p switch for incremental backups using the
last snapshot as a parent snapshot for sending only the changed data
?
Regards,
Felix
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wang,
thank you for your answer.
I am using the latest btrfs-progs with the 3.12 kernel. I don't have
access to the machine right now (it looks like it crashed :/) but I
can send the exact
Hi List,
My backup stopped working and I can't figure out why. I'm using
send/receive with the -p switch for incremental backups using the
last snapshot as a parent snapshot for sending only the changed data.
The problem occurs using my own backup script. After I discovered the
problem I did a
Hi,
fyi: Raid5/6 hit mainline in 3.9, with 3.8 you will not be able to use
those raid levels.
Regards,
Felix
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:07:53PM -0700, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
Hi List,
I have a filesystem that is spanning
Hi everyone,
I was trying the new send/receive feature today but can't make it work.
These are the commands I was using:
btrfs subvol snap -r /mnt/data1/@downloads/ /mnt/data1/snapshots/testsnap
btrfs send /mnt/data1/snapshots/testsnap | btrfs receive
/mnt/data1/snapshots/testreceive/
This
sbehr...@giantdisaster.de wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:51:59 +0200, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was trying the new send/receive feature today but can't make it work.
These are the commands I was using:
btrfs subvol snap -r /mnt/data1/@downloads/ /mnt/data1/snapshots/testsnap
btrfs send
On 5/30/12 12:14 AM, Maxim Mikheev wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently decided to use btrfs. It works perfectly for a week even
under heavy load. Yesterday I destroyed backups as cannot afford to have
~10TB in backups. I decided to switch on Btrfs because it was announced
that it stable already
I
On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Clemens,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for
repairing an ext2/3/4 system.
Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as
doomed.
Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of
On 5/8/12 6:53 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the
directory tree does the job.
Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is telling
you: The problem you have right now would
On 5/8/12 8:29 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 08.05.12:
As I've written many times: I want a system for my video collection
which allows
adding a bigger disk
deleting/removing a smaller disk
with simple commands.
btrfs seems to be able to do that
On 5/7/12 6:36 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 07.05.12:
It's dead - R.I.P.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I don't think we can point the
finger at btrfs here.
a) you know what to do with the bearer?
b) I like such errors - completely independent, but
Hi Helmut,
are you sure that 'mkfs.ext2/3/4 -L label /dev/xxx' doesn't create a
new fs?
Afaik to change a label of a given (ext2/3/4) filesystem you should use
tune2fs.
I don't have a linux system available right now but this is what I would
expect and what would make a lot more sense
backup mode and then create a snapshot. I'm not sure
if there is a way to integrate RMAN backups with btrfs snapshots. Maybe
an oracle expert could help out.
Kind regards,
Felix Blanke
On 2/20/12 4:29 PM, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
On 02/20/2012 07:49 PM, Andrew Henry wrote:
Will there be support
.
There are new bugs in 3.2, but on the other hand there are hundreds of
fixed bugs, new features etc.
Especially using alpha releases of software without upgrading whenever
there is a chance to seems very strange to me :)
Kind regards,
Felix Blanke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi,
I tried my SSD with luks and it is damn slow. I don't have any numbers for i/o
per
second but the read/write speed was 50% of the speed without luks. If you want
encryption and speed you have to use loopaes. Unfortunetly you have to patch
your
util-linux for that.
The advantage of
I'm using btrfs since one year now and it's quite fast. I don't feel any
differences to other filesystems. Never tried a benchmark but for my
daily work it's nice. I also never had any issues with the memory. Imho
nowadays memory isn't a problem at all in desktop computers. I bought
8gb of
Did you ever say something positive about btrfs? :D All I read from in
the last months is complaining about btrfs.
In this case it was his fault because he forget to update the fstab. Im
pretty sure it was also your fault when you screwed up your 2.6.38.5
kernel...
I'm sorry but it seems that
You don't understood me. Ofc the developer need bug reports and all that
stuff. But it's the way youre doing it. Imho a lot of your mails sounds
like the only goal of them are to punish btrfs.
Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, then I'm sorry. I'll be quite
about this topic now. I've
Well, the mail still says the truth :)
On 7/10/11 11:57 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Felix,
Du meintest am 10.07.11:
I'll be quiet about this topic now. I've to admit that I was a little
bit drunk yesterday. Sorry again!
Don't drink and write!
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe
Hi,
nope. All patches to the btrfs-progs aren't yet in the git. I think
it's up to chris to push all the patches.
Regards,
Felix
Am 08 Apr 2011 14:00:00 +0200
schrieb Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de:
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
when I run balance or delete and /dev/btrfs-control doesn't
exist
Hi,
are you sure that patch is in the kernel?
I'm using 2.6.37 and don't have those attribues in my /sys.
Felix
On 10. February 2011 - 13:29, Petr Uzel wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:29:27 +0100
From: Petr Uzel petr.u...@suse.cz
To: Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org
Cc: Felix Blanke
Yeah, for me its loop-aes.
Ah ok, didn't knew that it replaces that whole loop thing :)
Felix
On Feb 11, 2011 8:32 PM, Milan Broz mb...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/11/2011 08:23 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
What do you mean with configured?
I'm using loop devices with loop aes, and I've looked
I can't help you with your problem, but:
It is a really really really bad idea to store data without a backup on a
filesystem
that is still in some kind of alpha stadium (don't understand me wrong, I like
btrfs
and you guys do a really good job. But the lack of a working fsck keeps btrfs
in
Hi,
balancing 1TB of data can take 1 day. So I don't think there is something
wrong
just because the third device got no io. Just wait some more hours.
I don't know how the balancing does his work, but it is possible that it first
balance throught the old devices and then add the new one or
@users.sourceforge.net
address, or linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org
Felix Blanke wrote:
If I'm using the unpatched losetup (from util-linux-ng) and looping a
device like
/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD6400AAKS-22A7B2_WD-WCASY7780706-part3
it is using readlink to track down the link to e.g. /dev/sda3. But if
I'm
On 24. January 2011 - 13:13, Hugo Mills wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:13:41 +
From: Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk
To: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
Cc: kreij...@inwind.it, Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Mail
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:53:05PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
On 24. January 2011 - 13:13, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:01:04PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi,
you were talking about the LOOP_GET_STATUS function. I'm not quite sure
where does it
came from
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:29:36PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
If, instead, the initial losetup call tracked the symlinks back to
the original device node (i.e. something like /dev/sdb3, or
/dev/mapper/ruthven-btest in my example), then the name that's
stored in the kernel would be
util-linux-2.18-r1 and still no symlink following.
I'll ask for that at the kernel mailing list in the next days. If your (Hugo)
util-linux doesn't include any kind of patches that behaviour is really strange.
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 15:44, Felix Blanke wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:44
if there are any gentoo-patches applied during the build.
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 17:00, Hugo Mills wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:00:24 +
From: Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk
To: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Mail
posting about this in the
btrfs-list.
Thanks for your help!
Felix
On 24. January 2011 - 22:04, Felix Blanke wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:04:54 +0100
From: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
To: Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug
Hi,
no :)
All those patches need to be applied to the current git. I'm sure there will be
an
e-mail if all those patches are applied.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 15:26, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Date: 23 Jan 2011 15:26:00 +0100
From: Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de
To:
that bug is?
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 23:02, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:02:16 +0100
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it
To: Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk, Felix Blanke
felixbla...@gmail.com
CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re
a '*' :) Do you think that will solve the
problem?
I'll try it tomorrow.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 23:27, Hugo Mills wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:27:20 +
From: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
To: kreij...@inwind.it
Cc: Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk, Felix Blanke
Hi,
btrfsctl is deprecated, why you're adding new options to it? :)
Regards,
Felix
On 22. January 2011 - 12:59, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:59:22 +0100
From: Maximilian Mehnert maximilian.mehn...@gmx.de
To: linux-btrfs linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH]
, 22 Jan 2011 13:26:51 +0100
From: Maximilian Mehnert maximilian.mehn...@gmx.de
To: linux-btrfs linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -v option to btrfsctl to control verbosity: Be
quiet unless requested.
On 22/01/11 13:11, Felix Blanke wrote:
Hi,
btrfsctl is deprecated
Hi,
I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups.
When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I'm getting
error checking /dev/loop2 mount status
With strace I see where the problem is:
lstat(/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par,
0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No
I was able to create the fs with the --force options. But that bug should be
fixed,
too :)
Is that link maybe too long? It is created by udev, and there was never a
problem
using that link.
Regards,
Felix
On 22. January 2011 - 15:45, Felix Blanke wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:45:13 +0100
Am Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:37:38 +0900
schrieb Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com:
Hi.
(2010/11/11 16:48), Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 10.11.10:
findfs LABEL=MM2
shows /dev/sdd2 (the first partition)
file -s /dev/sdd2
file -s
Hi,
I saw some reports of ppl in this list who did a btrfs fi df /path and saw the
raidlevel of the data, metadata etc.
How? :)
I'm using the git version of the btrfs progs and 2.6.36, but I don't see those
informations.
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
What am I doing wrong? :(
Regards,
: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 04:33:30 -0600
From: cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com
To: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to see raid level?!
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I saw some reports of ppl in this list
Hi,
that was a good hint, thanks a lot!
The best at that solution is that it works for all filesystems: Just test if the
output of $type (type=`blkid -s TYPE -o value $loopdev`) is empty (''), then it
is no
filesystem and the loopaes password was wrong or the device/fs is broken.
Felix
On
Hi,
I've some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes.
I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the
decrypted fs
is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in
my
script.
Thanks for any help!
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this
Which is a really good thing!
HTML e-mails are useless and nobody should use them! I'm sure they came
directly from hell.
David Nicol schrieb:
Wow, vger categorically refuses HTML e-mail!
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, David Nicol davidni...@gmail.com wrote:
the inode number is an
Hi,
that issue is allready reported to this mailinglist and there is a longer
conversation about it.
Cheers,
Felix
On 04. October 2010 - 15:19, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:19:41 +0200
From: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject:
Worked like it should for me :)
Thanks a lot for your work.
I hope this patch will be merged soon.
Like G.Baroncelli says: It's such an essential feature.
Regards,
Felix
Goffredo Baroncelli schrieb:
Hi all,
this patch adds the command btrfs filesystem label to change (or show) the
label
back etc.?
Regards,
Felix
On 07. September 2010 - 20:46, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:46:19 -0400
From: Jérôme Poulin jeromepou...@gmail.com
To: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs and raid1 (restore
Hi,
I don't know what the problem is but I'm also using gentoo and the live ebuild
(amd64) and it compiles fine with
scooter ~ # gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo 4.4.3-r2 p1.2) 4.4.3
Regards,
Felix
On 28. August 2010 - 21:56, Zhu Yanhai wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:56:48 +0800
From: Zhu
Hi,
is there any way to set/change the label after the filesystem has been created?
Best regards,
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
such an elementary thing.
Thanks again for your help!
Regards,
Felix
On 24. August 2010 - 23:35, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:35:23 +0200
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@gmail.com
To: Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Set
54 matches
Mail list logo
