Hello,
I was just wondering what the status of the patch that would fix my
problem is. I have not heard from anyone in over a month, and I just
wanted to check in and see how it is progressing, or if you have put
it on hold for more important work like kernel 3.4. Thank you again
for helping me.
When you finish the patch, where should I get it from? Is it a general
btrfs patch, and I would grab it in the next kernel release, or is it
a specific patch for me, and I would grab it from a btrfs repository?
Thanks again for all of your help.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:36:35PM -0600, Travis Shivers wrote:
I upgraded my kernel so my version is now:
Linux server 3.3.0-030300rc5-generic #201202251535 SMP Sat Feb 25
20:36:29 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The problem has not been solved and I still get the previous errors.
Here is the output from the commands:
# ./btrfs-debug-tree -R /dev/sdh
failed to read /dev/sr0: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sde: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sdd: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sdc: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sdb: No medium found
failed to read
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:57:19PM -0600, Travis Shivers wrote:
Here is the output from the commands:
# ./btrfs-debug-tree -R /dev/sdh
failed to read /dev/sr0: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sde: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sdd: No medium found
failed to read /dev/sdc: No
Thank you all for helping. My btrfs array consists of 4 disks: 2 (2
TB) disks and 2(500 GB) disks. Since I have disks of different sizes,
I have the array being mirrored so that there are two copies of a file
on two separate disks. The data and metadata are mirrored.
I originally made the array
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:11:24PM -0600, Travis Shivers wrote:
Thank you all for helping. My btrfs array consists of 4 disks: 2 (2
TB) disks and 2(500 GB) disks. Since I have disks of different sizes,
I have the array being mirrored so that there are two copies of a file
on two separate
I was running a fairly old version of the kernel:
Linux server 3.0.0-16-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 27 17:44:39 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:11:24PM -0600, Travis Shivers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Travis Shivers ttshiv...@gmail.com wrote:
# ./btrfs-zero-log /dev/sdh
parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168 wanted 43477 found 43151
parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168 wanted 43477 found 43151
parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168
# btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdh
couldn't open because of unsupported option features (8).
btrfs-debug-tree: disk-io.c:679: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed
See if following patch helps.
Author: Chris Masonchris.ma...@oracle.com
Date: Wed Feb 22 12:36:24 2012 -0500
Btrfs: clear
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:41:45PM -0800, Gurudas Pai wrote:
# btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdh
couldn't open because of unsupported option features (8).
btrfs-debug-tree: disk-io.c:679: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed
See if following patch helps.
This patch may just fix things
Where should I grab the source from? The main repo that you have
listed on your main wiki page
(https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/articles/b/t/r/Btrfs_source_repositories.html)
is down:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
Has this patch been pushed to a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Travis Shivers ttshiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Where should I grab the source from? The main repo that you have
listed on your main wiki page
(https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/articles/b/t/r/Btrfs_source_repositories.html)
is down:
I upgraded my kernel so my version is now:
Linux server 3.3.0-030300rc5-generic #201202251535 SMP Sat Feb 25
20:36:29 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The problem has not been solved and I still get the previous errors.
# mount /dev/sdh /mnt/main
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad
14 matches
Mail list logo
