Hello list,
I just got myself a new SSD and decided to install yet another time
btrfs with ubuntu 13.04. I would like to ask if you suggest anything
for recommended options for mount on Crucial S4 SSD.
At the moment I am using:
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,ssd,subvol=@home
Anything else someone
On 24 May 2013 21:07, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
No need to specify ssd, it's automatically detected.
I'm not so sure it did detected. When I manually set it I saw
significant improvement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Without going back to check the wiki, IIRC it was there that the /sys
paths it checks for that detection are listed. Those paths are then
based on what the drive itself claims. If it claims to be rotating
storage...
I
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Mai 2013, 03:58:12 schrieb Duncan:
[...]
And can be verified by:
martin@merkaba:~ grep ssd /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/merkaba-debian / btrfs rw,noatime,compress=lzo,ssd,space_cache 0 0
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Harald Glatt m...@hachre.de wrote:
Data that already exists will only be compressed on re-write. You can
do it with btrfs fi defrag and a script that traverses the fs to call
defrag on every file. Another good way is the find command that has
been outlined
2011/1/12 Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com:
(2011/01/12 9:25), Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hey all,
I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
Information for the partitions follow:
# btrfs filesystem show
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid: 1882b025-58e4-4287-98a3
On 12 January 2011 00:58, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/12 Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com:
(2011/01/12 9:25), Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hey all,
I have a weird error with my RAID 0 btrfs partition.
Information for the partitions follow:
# btrfs filesystem
On 12 January 2011 18:45, Mikael Andersson mik...@develog.se wrote:
E.g. btrfsctl -r -4000m /dev/sda5
Hey Mikael,
btrfsctl is deprecated, you should use btrfs
In the previous example:
btrfs filesystem resize -4000m /dev/sda5
Check the help of btrfs
And also good to download latest btrfs-progs
Hello,
I just installed an archlinux with btrfs root partition and would like
to set the correct mount properties
Following this:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Solid_State_Drives
it says there that I should use the discard mount parameter to enable TRIM.
I would like to ask by using ssd
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:08 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I just installed an archlinux with btrfs root partition
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote:
On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca
wrote
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Hubert Kario ka...@wit.edu.pl wrote:
On Sunday 03 of July 2011 14:56:40 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote:
On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Juli 2011 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:08 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hello,
I just installed an archlinux with btrfs root partition and would
like to set the correct mount
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:45:17 AM Calvin Walton wrote:
The discard option is not currently automatically enabled; I think
there may have been some performance issues in certain cases with
drives that have slow trim
So any clues for the intel 320 series? I think it doesn't use compression.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
So any clues for the intel 320 series? I think it doesn't use compression.
At this point your best bet is to try it yourself and see
Hello,
Why the official repository is not updated with the latest patched for gcc 4.6?
I noticed that http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/
includes more patches than the
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
So I was wondering is it
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Why the official repository is not updated with the latest patched for gcc
4.6?
I noticed that http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Leonidas,
Du meintest am 04.08.11:
Another thing is that there are commands for creating the build
enviroment for fedora and debian but I found nowhere in the wiki the
dependencies of the btrfs-progs to compile
Updated the wiki accordingly
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Hallo, Leonidas,
Du meintest am 04.08.11:
Another thing is that there are commands for creating the build
Hello, I got a kernel bug error, my guess from BTRFS.
Here is the report,
Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.947970] BUG: unable to handle
kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0030
Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.948002] IP:
[a01ab027] btrfs_print_leaf+0x37/0x880
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I got a kernel bug error, my guess from BTRFS.
Here is the report,
Oct 22 20:44:43 localhost kernel: [25554.947970] BUG
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:22 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 07:24:42PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
A patch was submitted by Sergei Trofimovich to address the issue
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:51 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:33:05PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Here is it, it's big and contains usless information..
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/497299/
not all that useless ... I saw another BUG earlier than
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:51 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:33:05PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Here is it, it's big and contains usless information..
http
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Does not load. Wondering if this should work or has been moved ?
It's a victim of the kernel.org hack. Nobody seems to have a spare
copy, but the database on
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:00:19AM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Does not load
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git
However, when I come to make it fails like so:
gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o
Sorry for the HTML replies.. I just read the mail delivery failure and
turned it to plain text.
You can check the quoted text for my answers.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the latest btrfs-tools and 2.6.34-020634-generic kernel for lucid
I think a cron job checking the output of df could do that.
The shell script will check if there is enough space to create a snapshot
otherwise remove a snapshot.
How about that?
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:11 PM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:
I have an application where I want to
Hi all,
I want to make a btrfs raid0 on 2 partitions of my pc.
Until now I am using the mdadm tools to make a software raid of the 2
partitions /dev/sde2, /dev/sdd2
and then mkfs.etx4 the newly created /dev/md0 device.
From performance point of view is it better to keep the configuration of mdadm
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
g...@overclocked.net wrote:
On 7 August 2010 00:24, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
g...@overclocked.net wrote:
On 6 August 2010 20:23, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
g...@overclocked.net wrote:
On 7 August 2010 00:24, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen
Have you tried umounting and mounting before the second test to
eliminate any caching?
Which kernel you use?
2010/8/18 Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi,
We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance
of btrfs is very poor.
The test is that we create 5 files
The above command is not working on my system.
Information:
btrfs f df /media/data
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd
Linux woofy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 21:50:19 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
mount info:
/dev/sdd2 on /media/data type btrfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
/media/data is a raid 0 filesystem
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
The above command is not working on my system.
Information:
btrfs f df /media/data
btrfs f isn't unique; fi is the minimum to specify filesystem
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45:19PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
Since the 2.6.32 kernel is one of the long-term stable kernels, and
since a few projects (such as OpenVZ) and distros (such as Debian) are
using the 2.6.32 kernel, I've put together an experimental git branch
to
On 15/09/14, Mark Murawski wrote:
I should have plenty of space for this operation, but it fails
[...]
This might be useful:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Balance_Filters
Regards,
Leonidas
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body
Hi
Is there an issue with btrfs ccache and multiple threads during compilation?
I'm experiencing kernel panics while building Linux kernel on a btrfs system
with -j8 and ccache enabled. Google suggest there was some issue on earlier
kernels but my kernel is 3.16+
Anyone can confirm?
Thanks
On 17/10/14, Timofey Titovets wrote:
i use ccache and often compile linux from git,
I don't catch any errors with it.
Interesting, I re-enabled ccache on an ext4 partition (HDD) and worked
fine. So I suspect it's something to do with btrfs and SSD. My mount
options are:
/dev/sda3 on /home type
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:12:17PM -0700, Florian Hofmann wrote:
I ran it as root. The first times there was no output whatsoever. This
time triggering gave the SysRq : Show Blocked State line. Strange
Well that's weird,
Hello,
I've been following this list for years and I see during various situations
this message coming up. Some times it's a genuine problem that there is
actually not enough space. In other cases it's some by-product of something
else. I have seen this error personality on a broken system (
Hey all,
Just did a btrfs balance on a single device. Before the balance
operation here is the df result:
inglor@tiamat ~$ btrfs fi df /home
Data: total=19.19GB, used=9.34GB
System, DUP: total=32.00MB, used=4.00KB
Metadata, DUP: total=896.00MB, used=227.98MB
Then I issues a balance operation
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 08:20:19PM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hey all,
[..]
Anyone can explain me the Data row of the above output ? It used to be
19.19GB and now it's 10.00GB. It's like the partition shrunk
I'm using the same subject as it might be relevant, feel free to change it.#
I'm trying to do some maintenance to the system running over a btrfs file
system on root (/). I started a balance on the '/' partition and it failed with
the below information:
$ sudo btrfs balance start /
[sudo]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:52:44PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
In order to improve the performance of fsync, we use the outstanding
ordered extents to avoid looking up the checksum from the csum tree.
But we didn't filter out the ordered extents whose csum is still being
calculated, when we got
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:05:29AM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:44:43AM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
I'm using the same subject as it might be relevant, feel free to change it.#
I'm trying to do some maintenance to the system running over a btrfs file
system
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:05:29AM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:44:43AM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
I'm using the same subject as it might be relevant, feel free to change
On 12/02/2014 09:51, Jakob Truelsen wrote:
Hello. I am experiencing No space left on device with a btrfs file
system, yet I cannot seem to find any exhausted resource. Could some
resource I do not know about be exhausted, or is this caused by
something else. Below is a trace of information that
Hello,
On 30/09/15, Sjoerd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A RAID5 setup on raw devices doesn't want to automount on boot.
> [..]
Post your /etc/fstab file please.
Thanks
--
Sent using mutt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to
to metadata dublications is
overestimated and since my partition appears to be screwed I will make
sure next time to force it to have another copy there.
My progress from the repairs which both failed are: https://ptpb.pw/CtbC
Next step is initialize the extent tree
btrfs check --init-extent-tree
a
restart. Currently runnign through latest Archlinux liveCD
# uname -a
Linux archiso 4.7.5-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 24 13:04:22 CEST 2016
x86_64 GNU/Linux
# btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.7.3
As this is the root partition I am not able to access it without a
liveCD. Can I perform any kind of step
it-extent-tree --repair
and see if I can get something
Thanks,
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: s
log next days but seems it's ok.
Thanks for suggestions all,
Regards,
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
--
To unsubscribe from
is not really
frequent - just backup mainly.
Thanks for your time.
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
--
To unsubscribe from
ged the mount may take longer, but btrfs
> will complain so you'll see it in dmesg.
>
That was my idea and that's why I asked in ML.
I'll give 'noatime' a go and see if it's changes anything.
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: W
user0m0.430s
sys 0m0.031s
I think maybe the next step is to disable compression if I want to mount
it faster. Is this normal for BTRFS that performance would degrade after
some time?
Regards,
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read tex
58 matches
Mail list logo
