Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-30 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: ZFS doesn't need a fsck because you have throw away the file system and restore from backup for certain types of corruption: | What can I do if ZFS file system panics on every boot? [...] | This will remove all

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Daniel Kozlowski
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: Sean Bartell wingedtachikoma at gmail.com writes: Is there a more aggressive filesystem restorer than btrfsck?  It simply

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Hubert Kario
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:37:45 Daniel Kozlowski wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: Sean Bartell wingedtachikoma at gmail.com writes: Is there

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: Sean Bartell wingedtachikoma at gmail.com

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Sean Bartell
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:36:14PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Anthony Roberts
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:34:13 +0200, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote: On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:37:45 Daniel Kozlowski wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-29 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:22:43PM -0400, Sean Bartell wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:36:14PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet rdele...@gmail.com

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-28 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Kozlowski dan.kozlow...@gmail.com wrote: Sean Bartell wingedtachikoma at gmail.com writes: Is there a more aggressive filesystem restorer than btrfsck?  It simply gives up immediately with the following error: btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd:

Re: Is there a more aggressive fixer than btrfsck?

2010-06-02 Thread Sean Bartell
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:29:56PM -0700, u...@sonic.net wrote: Is there a more aggressive filesystem restorer than btrfsck? It simply gives up immediately with the following error: btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed. btrfsck currently only checks