Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-26 Thread Gary R Hook

On 03/26/2018 11:32 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:28:03 -0500
Gary R Hook  wrote:


Submitting a v3 because the example could better illuminate the options
by using loop construct inside of an if, addressing Jani's point but
without opening the door to later criticism.

I also like the verbage in v2/3 better, but I'll let Jonathan make the call.


As I told you, I was applying the first version; I did that last week.


Forgive me; was out of the office. I've seen maintainers comment but not 
necessarily execute immediately, and therefore I try to learn how each 
works, but here I made an assumption. No worries and sorry to bother.





BTW which tree should these be developed against? I used torvalds, but
I'm not entirely sure that was the proper one?


The MAINTAINERS file will (almost) always answer that question for
you:

T:  git git://git.lwn.net/linux.git docs-next


Good point. I should know better by now.

Again, thank you.

Gary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-26 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:28:03 -0500
Gary R Hook  wrote:

> Submitting a v3 because the example could better illuminate the options 
> by using loop construct inside of an if, addressing Jani's point but 
> without opening the door to later criticism.
> 
> I also like the verbage in v2/3 better, but I'll let Jonathan make the call.

As I told you, I was applying the first version; I did that last week.

> BTW which tree should these be developed against? I used torvalds, but 
> I'm not entirely sure that was the proper one?

The MAINTAINERS file will (almost) always answer that question for
you:

T:  git git://git.lwn.net/linux.git docs-next

For a patch like this it doesn't matter, since there's is no other work on
the file to conflict with.

THanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-26 Thread Gary R Hook

On 03/22/2018 04:12 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Jonathan Corbet  wrote:

To head that off, I think I'll apply your first version instead, sorry
Jani.


No worries.



Submitting a v3 because the example could better illuminate the options 
by using loop construct inside of an if, addressing Jani's point but 
without opening the door to later criticism.


I also like the verbage in v2/3 better, but I'll let Jonathan make the call.

BTW which tree should these be developed against? I used torvalds, but 
I'm not entirely sure that was the proper one?


Gary

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-22 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Jonathan Corbet  wrote:
> To head that off, I think I'll apply your first version instead, sorry
> Jani.

No worries.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-21 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:04:02 -0500
Gary R Hook  wrote:

> +Do use braces when a body is more complex than a single simple statement:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> + if (condition) {
> + if (another_condition)
> + do_something();
> + }

Somebody is sure to complain at some point that this should really be:

if (condition && another_condition)
do_something();

To head that off, I think I'll apply your first version instead, sorry
Jani.

In general I'm pretty reluctant to apply coding-style patches for the
simple reason that I sure don't want to be the arbitrator of proper kernel
style.  This one seems to fit well within the accepted norms, though.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH v2] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add an example for braces

2018-03-15 Thread Gary R Hook
Add another example of required braces when using a compound statements.

Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook 
---

Changes since v1:
- Move the new example up, and make it more generic

 Documentation/process/coding-style.rst |9 +
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst 
b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
index a20b44a40ec4..fcef0b4b59d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -188,6 +188,15 @@ and
else
do_that();
 
+Do use braces when a body is more complex than a single simple statement:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   if (condition) {
+   if (another_condition)
+   do_something();
+   }
+
 This does not apply if only one branch of a conditional statement is a single
 statement; in the latter case use braces in both branches:
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html