Hello,
Here is the output of hg log|head -n 5 for two different directories
(multiproto and multiproto_7200)
for multiproto:
changeset: 7205:9bdb997e38b5
tag: tip
user:Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date:Sun Feb 24 02:10:56 2008 +0400
summary: We can now reduce the
Hello,
I have tested again changesets 7201 and 7205 with verbose 5, 2 and 1
scanning 101 transponders on Hotbird (I attach my transponders file --
it is taken and adopted from ProgDvb).
Here are my statistics:
Changeset Verbose channels
7201 1
Vangelis Nonas wrote:
Hello,
I have tested again changesets 7201 and 7205 with verbose 5, 2 and 1
scanning 101 transponders on Hotbird (I attach my transponders file --
it is taken and adopted from ProgDvb).
Here are my statistics:
Changeset Verbose channels
Hello,
I attach the timing logs for changsets 7205 and 7201. The funny thing is
that when I use 7201 it does NOT have the problem with locking when
tuning, as it had before. I tried it 3 times, the third after a full
shutdown of the pc and having removed the power for a couple on minutes.
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset
7205 and 7200 ?
Do you mean changeset 7200 or 7204
[...]
Regards, Artem
--
Artem Makhutov
Unterort Str. 36
D-65760 Eschborn
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset
7205 and 7200 ?
Do you mean changeset 7200 or 7204
yep. 7205 is head, but just a minor change.
Regards,
Manu
Hello,
I tried scanning with the 7201 changeset and I believe the results are
better than the 7205 changeset. In the former case I get 2082 services
on hotbird, in the latter 1722.
I'll shortly send kernel logs for a failing transponder during scan.
And something else:
When I give to scan the
Vangelis Nonas wrote:
Hello,
I tried scanning with the 7201 changeset and I believe the results are
better than the 7205 changeset. In the former case I get 2082 services
on hotbird, in the latter 1722.
Hmm.. Ok.
Can you please get 7205 and load the stb0899 and stb6100 modules with
On 02/24/2008 06:56 PM, Vangelis Nonas wrote:
Hello,
I tried scanning with the 7201 changeset and I believe the results are
better than the 7205 changeset. In the former case I get 2082 services
on hotbird, in the latter 1722.
I'll shortly send kernel logs for a failing transponder
Hello,
I scanned using 7205 changeset. With verbose=5, I get 1801 services.
With verbose=2 I get 1725 services.
Using the 7201 changeset with verbose=5 I get 2082 services. I can check
for verbose=2 and changeset 7201 if you think it is useful.
I have the feeling that 7201 behaves better. It
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset
7205 and 7200 ?
Do you mean changeset
Vangelis Nonas wrote:
Hello,
I scanned using 7205 changeset. With verbose=5, I get 1801 services.
With verbose=2 I get 1725 services.
Using the 7201 changeset with verbose=5 I get 2082 services. I can check
for verbose=2 and changeset 7201 if you think it is useful.
It would be nice to
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset
7205 and 7200 ?
Do you mean changeset
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:23:02PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:27:27AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock
Just replying to myself.
Nobody has the same problems that I have with Skystar HD? Can someone
please explain the current status of the driver? Is this the expected
behavior, or I am doing something wrong?
Thank you,
Vagelis
NONAS EUAGGELOS wrote:
Hello,
I have a Skystar HD. I use
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:35:49PM +, Vangelis Nonas wrote:
My problems are:
- When I scan the same transponder more than once, sometimes I get some
services, sometimes I get no services.
I have never tried to scan with the SkyStar HD.
- When I zap (with szap2) to a station
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:31:01PM +0300, Igor wrote:
- When I zap (with szap2) to a station more than once, sometimes I get
a lock, sometimes I get no lock.
I have the same problem. I was trying to tune to ProSieben 100 times today.
And I got only 11 successful locks.
The
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:35:49PM +, Vangelis Nonas wrote:
My problems are:
- When I scan the same transponder more than once, sometimes I get some
services, sometimes I get no services.
I have never tried to scan with the SkyStar HD.
- When I zap (with
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:21:17AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
[...]
Can you guys please update from the multiproto tree and test again at
the earliest and give me your feedback ?
No, still the same:
Try: 50
Failes: 37
Tunes: 13
Maybe the problem is in the szap.c and not in the driver,
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:21:17AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
[...]
Can you guys please update from the multiproto tree and test again at
the earliest and give me your feedback ?
No, still the same:
Try: 50
Failes: 37
Tunes: 13
Maybe the problem is in
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:29:31AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:21:17AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
[...]
Can you guys please update from the multiproto tree and test again at
the earliest and give me your feedback ?
No, still the
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Artem Makhutov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:29:31AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Are you sure that you got the top level 2 changes changeset 7204 and 7203
respectively ?
Oh, I only got 7203. Will try with 7204 in a few minutes.
Awesome! It
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Artem Makhutov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:29:31AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Are you sure that you got the top level 2 changes changeset 7204 and 7203
respectively ?
Oh, I only got 7203. Will try with 7204 in a few
Manu Abraham wrote:
Artem Makhutov wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Artem Makhutov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:29:31AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
Are you sure that you got the top level 2 changes changeset 7204 and 7203
respectively ?
Oh, I only got 7203. Will try
Thank you all for your help,
With the latest changeset I can tune channels correctly. I tried vdr and
szap (from Manu).
I dont know how to undo the last changesets and go back to 7200. Please
tell me how to do it and I'll get the timings.
I also tried to scan Hotbird and it seems that
Vangelis Nonas wrote:
Thank you all for your help,
With the latest changeset I can tune channels correctly. I tried vdr and
szap (from Manu).
I dont know how to undo the last changesets and go back to 7200. Please
tell me how to do it and I'll get the timings.
clone the multiproto
Hello,
I have a Skystar HD. I use multiproto from here (checked it out yesterday):
http://jusst.de/hg/multiproto
It compiles fine, all needed modules are loaded automatically upon boot.
This is my dmesg:
saa7146: found saa7146 @ mem f88f2000 (revision 1, irq 21) (0x13c2,0x1019).
saa7146 (0): dma
28 matches
Mail list logo
