On 11/25/11 20:31, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On 11/25/11 13:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
From the log snippet it's
not entirely clear whether that's a recurring monitor (interval ==
whatever you configured, or 20 if default)
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 11/25/11 13:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> >> From the log snippet it's
> >> not entirely clear whether that's a recurring monitor (interval ==
> >> whatever you configured, or 20 if default), or a probe (interval == 0).
> >>
> >> A re
On 11/25/11 13:18, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11 in
>> Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
>>
>> [...]
>>> This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome!
>>
>> OK, I tried a l
On 11/25/11 13:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> From the log snippet it's
>> not entirely clear whether that's a recurring monitor (interval ==
>> whatever you configured, or 20 if default), or a probe (interval == 0).
>>
>> A recurring monitor clearly should not happen at all when unmanaged.
>
> That
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:34:33AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 11/25/11 10:47, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > The resource is unmanaged:
> > Nov 24 12:59:05 h03 pengine: [15876]: notice: LogActions: Leave
> > prm_c11_db_15k_raid1 (Started unmanaged)
> > [...]
> > LUN shrink begins:
> > Nov 24 1
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.11.2011 um 16:11 in
> Nachricht <2021151134.GB3600@squib>:
>
> [...]
> > This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome!
>
> OK, I tried a little, removing a lot. IMHO the new version is
On 11/25/11 10:47, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> The resource is unmanaged:
> Nov 24 12:59:05 h03 pengine: [15876]: notice: LogActions: Leave
> prm_c11_db_15k_raid1 (Started unmanaged)
> [...]
> LUN shrink begins:
> Nov 24 12:59:39 h03 kernel: [1220873.890571] sd 2:0:3:13: [sdai] Result:
> hostbyte
>>> Florian Haas schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 10:26 in
>>> Nachricht
<4ecf5f37.1090...@hastexo.com>:
> On 11/25/11 10:20, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I thought that an "unmanaged" resource would not mess wit hthe resources,
> but as it seems, the RAID1 monitor does auto-recovery even in unm
On 11/25/11 10:20, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I thought that an "unmanaged" resource would not mess wit hthe resources, but
> as it seems, the RAID1 monitor does auto-recovery even in unmanaged mode.
That's highly unlikely. Do you have any logs to back up that claim? If
so, please pastebin th
Hi!
I thought that an "unmanaged" resource would not mess wit hthe resources, but
as it seems, the RAID1 monitor does auto-recovery even in unmanaged mode. In
effect it re-added a LUN that was manually failed and removed using mdadm while
it was in a bad state (it had been shrunk) without resyn
10 matches
Mail list logo
