On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Mia Lueng wrote:
> And since hbtest02 is fenced , why does hbtest01 not take over the resource?
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch05s03.html#id637389
>
>
> 2010/12/1 Dimitri Maziuk
>
>> Mia Lueng wrote:
>>
>> > Are t
On 30 November 2010 19:22, Mia Lueng wrote:
> I've setup a two-node cluster in sles11 sp1. I use sbd as the stonith
> device. Here is my configuration:
> #crm configure show
> node hbtest01 \
> attributes standby="off"
> node hbtest02 \
> attributes standby="off"
> primitive g_app
Mia Lueng wrote:
> I saw in some ha solutions, a network tiebreaker is set to determinate which
> node should be fence or suicide in this suitation.
Yes, a 3rd vote.
> This is very useful in two-node cluster solution.
Only 2 things are useful in a 2-node apache cluster: 1) if both nodes
are on
I saw in some ha solutions, a network tiebreaker is set to determinate which
node should be fence or suicide in this suitation.
This is very useful in two-node cluster solution.
2010/12/1 Dimitri Maziuk
> Mia Lueng wrote:
>
> > Are there any network tiebreaker configuration to determinate which
And since hbtest02 is fenced , why does hbtest01 not take over the resource?
2010/12/1 Dimitri Maziuk
> Mia Lueng wrote:
>
> > Are there any network tiebreaker configuration to determinate which node
> > should be fenced in this two-node cluster split-brain suitaion? In my
> case,
> > since all
Mia Lueng wrote:
> Are there any network tiebreaker configuration to determinate which node
> should be fenced in this two-node cluster split-brain suitaion? In my case,
> since all nic links of hbtest02 is unpluged, the resource should be taken
> over by the one with healthy net link.
You do rea
I've setup a two-node cluster in sles11 sp1. I use sbd as the stonith
device. Here is my configuration:
#crm configure show
node hbtest01 \
attributes standby="off"
node hbtest02 \
attributes standby="off"
primitive g_app ocf:heartbeat:apache \
operations $id="g_app-operat
