Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Monitoring Process Death

2010-05-28 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2010-05-21T12:12:12, Bob Schatz bsch...@yahoo.com wrote: I think the basic requirements are: 1.When a process starts it registers itself with a kernel component. This registration also gets passed an action. The easiest way would be for the RA to register pids to be monitored to lrmd,

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Monitoring Process Death

2010-05-28 Thread Bob Schatz
Thanks Lars and Dejan for your feedback. I have started reading the lrmd source. One thing I am worried about is that if I give a PID to lrmd, how will lrmd monitor it? My RA is a shell script that forks off a daemon. If I give this daemon PID to lrmd does lrmd start a thread to monitor PID?

Re: [Linux-HA] stonith: failure using expect+ssh (solved)

2010-05-28 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:48:15PM -0600, Tim Serong wrote: On 5/27/2010 at 10:24 PM, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46:14AM +0200, Matthias Ferdinand wrote: --On Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:00:02 -0600 linux-ha-requ...@lists.linux-ha.org

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem with migration on a nfs/exportfs setup while copying via rsync

2010-05-28 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:23:16AM +0200, RaSca wrote: Hi all, I've got some problems with my setup and I'm trying to understand if I am missing something or is a bug, here is how to reproduce the error: node debian-lenny-nodo1 node debian-lenny-nodo2 primitive drbd0 ocf:linbit:drbd

Re: [Linux-HA] stonith: failure using expect+ssh (solved)

2010-05-28 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:07:53AM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:48:15PM -0600, Tim Serong wrote: On 5/27/2010 at 10:24 PM, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46:14AM +0200, Matthias Ferdinand wrote: --On Wednesday, May

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem with migration on a nfs/exportfs setup while copying via rsync

2010-05-28 Thread RaSca
Il giorno Ven 28 Mag 2010 12:29:24 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: Hi, Hi Dejan, thanks for your answer. [...] the only way to make things work again is to cleanup the nfs_clone resource (or restart the nfs-kernel-server daemon) and then cleanup the store group. It seems that the

Re: [Linux-HA] stonith: failure using expect+ssh (solved)

2010-05-28 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:32:33PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:07:53AM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:48:15PM -0600, Tim Serong wrote: On 5/27/2010 at 10:24 PM, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote: On Thu, May 27,

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem with migration on a nfs/exportfs setup while copying via rsync

2010-05-28 Thread RaSca
Il giorno Ven 28 Mag 2010 12:34:06 CET, RaSca ha scritto: [...] Note that the nfs-kernel-server isn't connected to the exportfs, but is only a cloned resource, so it isn't touched by the migration process. [...] Ok Dejan, I've patched the Filesystem RA, and here are the configuration changes:

Re: [Linux-HA] SLES10 RPM Package

2010-05-28 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/1/26 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ciro Iriarte cyru...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ciro Iriarte cyru...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: Also, in the

Re: [Linux-HA] SLES10 RPM Package

2010-05-28 Thread Werner Flamme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciro Iriarte [28.05.2010 15:30]: 2010/1/26 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ciro Iriarte cyru...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ciro Iriarte

Re: [Linux-HA] SLES10 RPM Package

2010-05-28 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2010/5/28 Werner Flamme werner.fla...@ufz.de: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciro Iriarte [28.05.2010 15:30]: 2010/1/26 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ciro Iriarte cyru...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/25 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net: On

[Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread mike
Anyone ever see an issue where ldirector would not pass requests to 2 backend real servers on a certain port (in my case 8080) but if you change that to port 22, it works flawlessly? Its really strange that it would work on one port but not another. Any hints?

Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread Pushkar Pradhan
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of mike Sent: Fri 5/28/2010 10:01 AM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector Anyone ever see an issue where ldirector would not pass requests to 2 backend

Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread mike
Pushkar Pradhan wrote: From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of mike Sent: Fri 5/28/2010 10:01 AM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector Anyone ever see an issue where ldirector would not

Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread Pushkar Pradhan
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of mike Sent: Fri 5/28/2010 12:08 PM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector Pushkar Pradhan wrote: From:

Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread mike
Pushkar Pradhan wrote: From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of mike Sent: Fri 5/28/2010 12:08 PM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector Pushkar Pradhan wrote:

Re: [Linux-HA] odd issues with LinuxHA/ldirector

2010-05-28 Thread Robinson, Eric
Anyone ever see an issue where ldirector would not pass requests to 2 backend real servers on a certain port I saw that once. I checked the ldirectord perl code and it turned out that certain ports were reserved. The port I was trying to use was one of them. Can't imagine that being the case

[Linux-HA] Colocation, location, auto-failback=off

2010-05-28 Thread Diego Woitasen
Hi, * I have three nodes: ha1, ha2 y ha3. * Three resources: sfex, xfs_fs, ip. * sfex and xfs_fs are members of a group called xfs_grp. * xfs_grp can run on any node but ip resource can run on ha1 or ha2 only. * When xfs_grp is running on ha1 or ha2, ip must run on the same node. * One