ah, sorry, i hadn't seen this patch when i replied earlier.
i'll apply something like this tomorrow (i might standardize the on --
force though as its used in other tools too).
On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Xinwei Hu wrote:
2007/12/5, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2007-12-04T21:2
i'll implement the --force|-f approach tomorrow.
On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Joachim Banzhaf wrote:
Hi Hu,
Am Dienstag 04 Dezember 2007 14:29:35 schrieb Xinwei Hu:
2007/12/4, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2007-12-04T00:20:15, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
We h
Hi Hu,
Am Dienstag 04 Dezember 2007 14:29:35 schrieb Xinwei Hu:
> 2007/12/4, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 2007-12-04T00:20:15, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >We have a instance about cibadmin recently. A typo of 'cibadmin -r
> > > blahblah' forc
2007/12/5, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2007-12-04T21:29:35, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The more dangerous commands usually require a --force option on other
> > > tools. (fsck, mkfs, rpm, drbdadm, ...)
> > The reason that I don't go this way is concerning the port
On 2007-12-04T21:29:35, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The more dangerous commands usually require a --force option on other
> > tools. (fsck, mkfs, rpm, drbdadm, ...)
> The reason that I don't go this way is concerning the portability.
> getopt_long is not a POSIX standard AFAIK.
Then
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
this commit is wrong - only the children indicated in the process
definition are allowed to die
please revert this change asap
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/e4a4c6fd5649
Well... That's not what happens in reality, and as far as I can tell
it's expected.
When one of y
2007/12/4, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2007-12-04T00:20:15, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >We have a instance about cibadmin recently. A typo of 'cibadmin -r
> > blahblah' forces the HA into RO mode without any warning, and the
> > field engineer almo
On 2007-12-04T00:20:15, Xinwei Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>We have a instance about cibadmin recently. A typo of 'cibadmin -r
> blahblah' forces the HA into RO mode without any warning, and the
> field engineer almost panic. ;)
I like the direction.
The more dangerous command
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:20:15AM +0800, Xinwei Hu wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >> We have a instance about cibadmin recently. A typo of 'cibadmin -r
> >>blahbla
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:56:50AM +0800, Xinwei Hu wrote:
> 2007/12/4, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:20:15AM +0800, Xinwei Hu wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> We have a
10 matches
Mail list logo
