On 2007-07-19T20:40:12, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in "let's try and do this right mode". You act like that's a bad thing.
I don't. Sigh. I take no issue with your release procedures about
discussing patches before merging them. I'm just pointing out that all
Andrew suggeste
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-07-19T13:08:17, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrew has told me explicitly on the mailing list that he felt he had no
>> restrictions on what he could push to dev. Those may _all_ be good, but
>> does he in his judgment think every single one
On 2007-07-19T13:08:17, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Renegotiating it now would delay the release, probably by another week
> or more - we don't have the greatest track record at the moment for any
> kind of harmonious discussion - even if only facts are concerned, much
> less thing
On 2007-07-19T13:08:17, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew has told me explicitly on the mailing list that he felt he had no
> restrictions on what he could push to dev. Those may _all_ be good, but
> does he in his judgment think every single one is low enough risk to
> meet the
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-07-18T15:56:56, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have gotten enough negative remarks to last the rest of my life about
>> things related to releases, and got agreement on these procedures. I'm
>> not opening up any new can of worms, by failing t
On 2007-07-18T15:56:56, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gotten enough negative remarks to last the rest of my life about
> things related to releases, and got agreement on these procedures. I'm
> not opening up any new can of worms, by failing to follow the documented
> procedu
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> The great thing about mercurial is that its a distributed system where
> all repositories are equal peers of one another.
>
> And rather than sending emails, which have a fair chance of falling
> into a black-hole, one can simply use a news reader to subscribe to
> Mercuria
The great thing about mercurial is that its a distributed system where
all repositories are equal peers of one another.
And rather than sending emails, which have a fair chance of falling
into a black-hole, one can simply use a news reader to subscribe to
Mercurial's automated "changes" feed whic
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On 7/17/07, DAIKI MATSUDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hello, All.
>> >>
>> >> I tested Heartbeat dev tree(fb46aeb2b784) and found a bug on ocf
>> >> scripts files, e.g. drbd.
>> >>
>> >>
On 7/17/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 7/17/07, DAIKI MATSUDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, All.
>>
>> I tested Heartbeat dev tree(fb46aeb2b784) and found a bug on ocf
>> scripts files, e.g. drbd.
>>
>> drbd[9174]: 2007/07/17_14:02:45 DEBUG: dr
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 7/17/07, DAIKI MATSUDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, All.
>>
>> I tested Heartbeat dev tree(fb46aeb2b784) and found a bug on ocf
>> scripts files, e.g. drbd.
>>
>> drbd[9174]: 2007/07/17_14:02:45 DEBUG: drbd0: Command output:
>> /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d//heartbe
On 7/17/07, DAIKI MATSUDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, All.
I tested Heartbeat dev tree(fb46aeb2b784) and found a bug on ocf
scripts files, e.g. drbd.
drbd[9174]: 2007/07/17_14:02:45 DEBUG: drbd0: Command output:
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d//heartbeat/drbd: line 148: /crm_master: No
such f
Hello, All.
I tested Heartbeat dev tree(fb46aeb2b784) and found a bug on ocf
scripts files, e.g. drbd.
drbd[9174]: 2007/07/17_14:02:45 DEBUG: drbd0: Command output:
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d//heartbeat/drbd: line 148: /crm_master: No
such file or directory
lrmd[]: 2007/07/17_14:02:45 info:
13 matches
Mail list logo
